Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 26(6): 613-20, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27083381

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Video-laryngoscopes provide better glottic visualization, but tracheal intubation times are longer, compared to conventional direct laryngoscopy in adult patients with normal airways. The objective of this randomized crossover study was to compare times to successful tracheal intubation with video-laryngoscope and direct laryngoscopy in manikins simulating infants with normal and abnormal airways. METHODS: Thirty experienced pediatric anesthesia practitioners performed tracheal intubation in three distinct manikins simulating infants with (i) a normal airway (ii), an anterior larynx, and (iii) the Pierre Robin sequence anatomy. These were performed using a standard Miller #1 blade, the GlideScope Cobalt AVL, and the Truview PCD video-laryngoscope, first in a normal neck and then an unstable cervical spine scenario (18 intubations/subject). The specific assigned order of devices and manikins for each participant was based on a three by three Latin square design to minimize carryover effects between the model and the device. Predefined times to intubation were analyzed by Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: Intubation times were shorter and success rates were higher with the Miller blade compared to either the GlideScope or the Truview videoscope in all three manikins in both scenarios, but did not differ between the GlideScope and the Truview devices. Improved intubation times and success rates in the unstable cervical spine scenario compared to the normal neck were attributed to learning effects with sequential intubation. CONCLUSION: Higher success rates and shorter intubation times with the Miller blade compared to either video-laryngoscope may reflect greater experience with direct laryngoscopy, need for more video-laryngoscopy training, or result from the manikin design. Individual practitioners may differ in their preference of device for intubating a child with anticipated difficult airway based on their previous experiences, self-assessment of their skills, and evaluation of the child's airway anatomy.


Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Laringoscopios , Maniquíes , Grabación en Video , Niño , Estudios Cruzados , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos
2.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 39(2): 81-9, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25967128

RESUMEN

Fetal ultrasonography is an important tool used to prenatally diagnose many craniofacial conditions. Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a rare congenital deformation characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction. PRS can present as a perinatal emergency when the retropositioned tongue obstructs the airway leading to respiratory compromise. More predictable and reliable diagnostic studies could help the treating medical team as well as families prepare for these early airway emergencies. The medical literature was reviewed for different techniques used to prenatally diagnose PRS radiologically. We have reviewed these techniques and suggested a possible diagnostic pathway to consistently identify patients with PRS prenatally.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Pierre Robin/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Glosoptosis/complicaciones , Glosoptosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Micrognatismo/complicaciones , Micrognatismo/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Pierre Robin/complicaciones , Polihidramnios/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo
3.
Anesth Analg ; 115(2): 356-63, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22669347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bilateral myringotomy and placement of ventilating tubes (BMT) is one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures in the United States. Many children who undergo BMT develop behavioral changes in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and require rescue pain medication. The incidence of these changes is lower in children receiving intraoperative opioids by the nasal, IM, or IV route compared with placebo. However, there are no data to indicate which route of administration is better. Our study was designed to compare the immediate postoperative analgesic and behavioral effects of 3 frequently used intraoperative techniques of postoperative pain control for patients undergoing BMT under general anesthesia. METHODS: One hundred seventy-one ASA physical status I and II children scheduled for BMT were randomized into 1 of 3 groups: group 1-nasal fentanyl 2 µg/kg with IV and IM saline placebo; group 2-IV morphine 0.1 mg/kg with nasal and IM placebo; or group 3-IM morphine 0.1 mg/kg with nasal and IV placebo. All subjects received a standardized general anesthetic with sevoflurane, N(2)O, and O(2) and similar postoperative care. The primary end point of the study was the pain scores measured by the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale in the PACU. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in peak FLACC pain among the 3 groups (mean [95% CI] 2.0 [1.2-2.8] for intranasal fentanyl, 2.7 [1.7-3.6] for IV morphine, and 2.9 [2.1-3.7] for IM morphine, respectively). There were no differences in the scores on the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, incidence of postoperative emergence delirium (PAED score ≥ 12), emesis, perioperative hypoxemia, or need for airway intervention, and postoperative rescue analgesia. There were also no differences in the duration of PACU stay or parental satisfaction among the groups. CONCLUSION: In this double-blind, double-dummy study, there was no difference in the efficacy of intranasal fentanyl, IM and IV morphine in controlling postoperative pain and emergence delirium in children undergoing BMT placement. The IM route is the simplest and avoids the potential for delays to establish vascular access for IV therapy and the risks of laryngospasm if intranasal drugs pass through the posterior nasopharynx and irritate the vocal cords.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Conducta Infantil/efectos de los fármacos , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otológicos/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Membrana Timpánica/cirugía , Administración Intranasal , Factores de Edad , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Tubos Torácicos , Niño , Preescolar , Delirio/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Fentanilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Lactante , Conducta del Lactante/efectos de los fármacos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Masculino , Morfina/efectos adversos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Texas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA