RESUMEN
Aims: To describe nursing practices for financial toxicity management based on nurses' perceptions. Materials & methods: A survey was conducted with 615 oncology nurses in Japan, focusing on nurses' perspectives on the importance of financial toxicity, nursing practices to manage financial toxicity and factors inhibiting its management. Results: A total of 521 participated, of whom 266 respondents (51.1%) considered nurses' role important, and they engaged in a significantly higher proportion of nursing practices. Participants with greater perceptions of their role included certified or specialized nurses and nurses responsible for outpatient care. Conclusion: Interventions leveraging the expertise of certified or specialized nurses and nurses involved in outpatient care could help to spread proactive nurse practices addressing financial toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Estrés Financiero , Humanos , Certificación , Japón , Seguro de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Financial burden of cancer treatment can negatively affect patients and their families. This study aimed to evaluate the financial toxicity of patients treated with molecular-targeted and immune therapies and explore the relationship between financial toxicity and patient experiences associated with the financial burden of cancer treatment. METHODS: This anonymous, self-administered questionnaire survey conducted across nine hospitals in Japan included patients aged 20-60 years who were receiving molecular-targeted agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors for any type of cancer for ≥ 2 months. Financial toxicity was evaluated using the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). Patient experience was examined using 11 items based on previous studies. Independent factors related to financial toxicity were explored using multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: The mean COST score was 17.0 ± 8.4, and 68 (49.3%) participants reported COST scores at or below the cutoff point. The factors contributing to financial toxicity were "hesitation regarding continuing treatment based on finances" (sß = - 0.410, p < 0.001), "cutting through my deposits and savings" (sß = - 0.253, p = 0.003), and "reducing spending on basics like food or clothing" (sß = - 0.205, p = 0.046) along with comorbidities (sß = - 0.156, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Patients receiving molecular-targeted and immune therapies are at risk of experiencing profound financial toxicity and a reduced quality of life. The independently related factors that we identified have the potential to serve as indicators of profound financial toxicity and the need for specialized intervention.