RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Stroke is a medical emergency requiring timely intervention to optimize patient outcomes. The only treatments currently Food and Drug Administration approved for acute stroke are intravenous (IV) thrombolytics, which require obtaining specific medical history to be administered safely. This medical history may be overlooked in the prehospital setting or lost during patient handoff between emergency medical services (EMS) personnel and hospital staff, delaying treatment. We evaluated whether utilization of a "stroke alert sticker" by EMS to capture key information in the field would decrease door-to-needle (DTN) time. METHODS: Bright-orange "stroke alert stickers" were disseminated to our local EMS agency to be placed on all suspected stroke patients in the field prompting documentation of key elements needed for timely treatment decisions. The "stroke alert sticker" included time last known well, contact information, presenting symptoms, and relevant medications. We evaluated the impact of the "stroke alert sticker" on acute stroke metrics, including DTN time. RESULTS: The project included 220 consecutive stroke alert patients brought to our comprehensive stroke center by a single EMS agency from May 2021 through February 2022. Twenty-one patients were treated with an IV thrombolytic. Overall "stroke alert sticker" use compliance was 40%; for the subgroup of patients who were given an IV thrombolytic, the "stroke alert sticker" was used 60% of the time. In patients who received an IV thrombolytic, prehospital EMS notification was 100% with "stroke alert sticker" use, compared with 75% without (P = .13). In addition, with "stroke alert sticker" utilization, DTN time was reduced by 20 minutes (31 [11] minutes with sticker vs 51 [21] minutes without, P = .04). CONCLUSION: Utilization of the "stroke alert sticker" significantly improved DTN times compared with patients without the sticker. This evidence supports continued use of the "stroke alert sticker" to improve DTN times and patient outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Postdischarge patient calls are an effective intervention to decrease unplanned readmissions. Despite its efficacy, calls are time consuming and compete with other clinical obligations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the viability of intern-led quality improvement (QI) on conducting initial postdischarge calls to filter patients who require clinical or nurse follow-up. Methods: QI interns from an academic medical center's QI program completed postdischarge patient calls within 72 hours of patient discharge from a neurosurgery service between June 2018 and July 2019. QI interns filtered patients who required follow-up calls from a clinical service or nurse department. The departments called patients within 48 hours of requests. Unplanned readmission rate was compared between the cohort of patients who requested and received a follow-up call versus a cohort of patients who requested and did not receive a follow-up call (control). Results: QI interns completed 83.8% postdischarge patient calls within 72 hours of discharge. Reasons for unsuccessful calls included patient unresponsiveness (74.6%), wrong phone number on file (13.9%), and request to be called at a different time (11.5%). Nurses completed 57.2% follow-up requests within the targeted 48 hours and completed remaining requests within 7 days. QI intern postdischarge follow-up calls, in conjunction with nurse follow-up intervention, showed a significant (risk ratio = -3.31, p = 0.012) preventive effect on unplanned readmission rate. Conclusions: QI interns are a viable alternative to nurses to conduct the first contact of postdischarge patient follow-up calls. This system of QI interns filtering calls to the correct clinical service or nurse department increased postdischarge patient follow-up calls success rate and decreased readmission rates.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a progressive mobility program in a neurocritical care population with the hypothesis that the benefits and outcomes of the program (e.g., decreased length of stay) would have a significant positive economic impact. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of economic and clinical outcome data before, immediately following, and 2 years after implementation of the Progressive Upright Mobility Protocol Plus program (UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, FL) involving a series of planned movements in a sequential manner with an additional six levels of rehabilitation in the neuro-ICU at UF Health Shands Hospital. SETTING: Thirty-bed neuro-ICU in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult neurologic and neurosurgical patients: 1,118 patients in the pre period, 731 patients in the post period, and 796 patients in the sustained period. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of Progressive Upright Mobility Protocol Plus. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ICU length of stay decreased from 6.5 to 5.8 days in the immediate post period and 5.9 days in the sustained period (F(2,2641) = 3.1; p = 0.045). Hospital length of stay was reduced from 11.3 ± 14.1 days to 8.6 ± 8.8 post days and 8.8 ± 9.3 days sustained (F(2,2641) = 13.0; p < 0.001). The impact of the study intervention on ICU length of stay (p = 0.031) and hospital length of stay (p < 0.001) remained after adjustment for age, sex, diagnoses, sedation, and ventilation. Hospital-acquired infections were reduced by 50%. Average total cost per patient after adjusting for inflation was significantly reduced by 16% (post period) and 11% (sustained period) when compared with preintervention (F(2,2641) = 3.1; p = 0.045). Overall, these differences translated to an approximately $12.0 million reduction in direct costs from February 2011 through the end of 2013. CONCLUSIONS: An ongoing progressive mobility program in the neurocritical care population has clinical and financial benefits associated with its implementation and should be considered.

Asunto(s)