Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 11(1): e0146370, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26741489

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment of breast cancer patients with distant metastases represents one of the biggest challenges in today's gynecological oncology. Therefore, a better understanding of mechanisms promoting the development of metastases is of paramount importance. The serine/threonine kinase AKT was shown to drive cancer progression and metastasis. However, there is emerging data that single AKT isoforms (i.e. AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3) have different or even opposing functions in the regulation of cancer cell migration in vitro, giving rise to the hypothesis that inhibition of distinct AKT isoforms might have undesirable effects on cancer dissemination in vivo. METHODS: The triple negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 was used to investigate the functional roles of AKT in migration and metastasis. AKT single and double knockdown cells were generated using isoform specific shRNAs. Migration was analyzed using live cell imaging, chemotaxis and transwell assays. The metastatic potential of AKT isoform knockdown cells was evaluated in a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model in vivo. RESULTS: Depletion of AKT3, but not AKT1 or AKT2, resulted in increased migration in vitro. This effect was even more prominent in AKT2,3 double knockdown cells. Furthermore, combined downregulation of AKT2 and AKT3, as well as AKT1 and AKT3 significantly increased metastasis formation in vivo. Screening for promigratory proteins revealed that downregulation of AKT3 increases the expression of S100A4 protein. In accordance, depletion of S100A4 by siRNA approach reverses the increased migration induced by knockdown of AKT3. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that knockdown of AKT3 can increase the metastatic potential of triple negative breast cancer cells. Therefore, our results provide a rationale for the development of AKT isoform specific inhibitors.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/genética , Proteínas S100/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/genética , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Animales , Línea Celular Tumoral , Movimiento Celular , Quimiotaxis/genética , Cámaras de Difusión de Cultivos , Femenino , Silenciador del Gen , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Ratones , Invasividad Neoplásica , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/metabolismo , ARN Interferente Pequeño/genética , ARN Interferente Pequeño/metabolismo , Proteína de Unión al Calcio S100A4 , Proteínas S100/agonistas , Proteínas S100/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
2.
J Cancer ; 6(12): 1195-205, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26535060

RESUMEN

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer, and the third most common cause of cancer related death worldwide. The multi-kinase inhibitor Sorafenib represents the only systemic treatment option until today, and results from clinical trials with allosteric mTOR inhibitors were sobering. Since the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathways are frequently upregulated in HCC, we have analyzed the effects of AKT inhibitor MK-2206, MEK inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY 142886) and mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055, given as single drugs or in combination, on proliferation and apoptosis of three HCC cell lines in vitro. We show that all three inhibitor combinations synergistically inhibit proliferation of the three HCC cell lines, with the strongest synergistic effect observed after vertical inhibition of AKT and mTORC1/2. We demonstrate that AKT kinase activity is restored 24h after blockade of mTORC1/2 by increased phosphorylation of T308, providing a rationale for combined targeting of AKT and mTOR inhibition in HCC. Our data suggest that a combination of inhibitors targeting those respective pathways may be a viable approach for future application in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

3.
Cell Signal ; 27(11): 2191-200, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26210887

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Development of small molecular inhibitors against BRAF and MEK has been a breakthrough in the treatment of malignant melanoma. However, the long-term effect is foiled in virtually all patients by the emergence of resistant tumor cell populations. Therefore, mechanisms resulting in the acquired resistance against BRAF and MEK inhibitors have gained much attention and several strategies have been proposed to overcome tumor resistance, including interval treatment or withdrawal of these compounds after disease progression. METHODS: Using a panel of cell lines with an acquired resistance against MEK inhibitors, we have evaluated the sensitivity of these cells against compounds targeting AKT/mTOR signaling, as well as novel ERK1/2 inhibitors. Furthermore, the effects of withdrawal of MEK inhibitor on migration in resistant cell lines were analyzed. RESULTS: We demonstrate that withdrawal of BRAF or MEK inhibitors in tumor cells with an acquired resistance results in reactivation of ERK1/2 signaling and upregulation of EMT-inducing transcription factors, leading to a highly migratory and invasive phenotype of cancer cells. Furthermore, we show that migration in these cells is independent from AKT/mTOR signaling. However, combined targeting of AKT/mTOR using MK-2206 and AZD8055 efficiently inhibits proliferation in all resistant tumor cell lines analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that combined targeting of MEK/AKT/mTOR or treatment with a novel ERK1/2 inhibitor downstream of BRAF/MEK suppresses proliferation as well as migration and invasion in resistant tumor cells. We provide a rationale against the discontinuation of BRAF or MEK inhibitors in patients with an acquired resistance, and provide a rationale for combined targeting of AKT/mTOR and MEK/ERK1/2, or direct targeting of ERK1/2 as an effective treatment strategy.


Asunto(s)
Movimiento Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinasas de Proteína Quinasa Activadas por Mitógenos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Bencimidazoles/farmacología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidor p27 de las Quinasas Dependientes de la Ciclina/genética , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Quinasas MAP Reguladas por Señal Extracelular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Células HCT116 , Células HT29 , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/farmacología , Humanos , Morfolinas/farmacología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteína S6 Ribosómica/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Melanoma Cutáneo Maligno
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA