RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain face different impairments in daily life. After an inpatient pain rehabilitation program, adolescents function better on several domains. The aim of this study was to explore the long-term work participation of adults who followed inpatient pain rehabilitation during adolescence because of chronic musculoskeletal pain and to identify potential facilitators and barriers regarding work in later life. METHODS: A mixed-methods study with standardized questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The questionnaires measured pain, disability, work status, and the quality and quantity of the work. The interviews contained questions about work participation. Potential participants were all patients who had participated in an inpatient pain rehabilitation program 15 to 20 years previously. Analyses were performed by thematic analysis. Using the Sherbrooke model as guidance, themes were classified into 4 systems: healthcare, workplace, legislative/insurance, and personal. RESULTS: Fourteen patients consented to participate (12 females). Seventy-one percent of them had paid work. The mean self-reported quality of the work delivered was 9.6 (standard deviation = 0.5). Eighteen facilitators and 12 barriers regarding work participation later on in life were mentioned. The inpatient pain rehabilitation program was the most frequently mentioned facilitator (n = 5), while the personal system and coping-related factors were the most frequently mentioned barriers (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: Ten out of 14 participants are currently working, most of them despite experiencing pain. Several factors based on the 4 systems of the Sherbrooke model contribute as facilitators or barriers regarding current work participation. Pain rehabilitation is mostly regarded as a facilitator for work participation later on in life.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/rehabilitación , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Musculoesquelético/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The relationship between perceived athletic competence (PAC) and physical activity (PA) in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is still unclear. This study investigated differences in PAC and PA between, and within, a group of children with DCD that were clinically referred (n = 31) and a group of control children (n = 38), aged 7-12 years. All children were categorized in four groups: (1) children with DCD/low PAC, (2) children with DCD/normal to high PAC, (3) control children/low PAC, and (4) control children/normal to high PAC. PAC was assessed with the Self-Perception Profile for Children, and PA was assessed with the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire. Children with DCD participated less in unorganized PA, but not in organized PA, compared with control children. Normal to high PAC was found in more than half of the children (64.5%) with DCD. Children with DCD/low PAC and children with DCD/normal to high PAC participated significantly less in unorganized physical activity compared with control children/normal to high PAC, but not compared with control children/low PAC. The results indicate that there are large individual differences in PAC in children with DCD.
Asunto(s)
Rendimiento Atlético/psicología , Actividad Motora/fisiología , Trastornos de la Destreza Motora/psicología , Autoimagen , Rendimiento Atlético/fisiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Destreza Motora , Trastornos de la Destreza Motora/fisiopatología , Percepción , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative hand therapy in patients after surgery for Dupuytren's contracture is common medical practice to improve outcomes. Until now, patients are referred for postoperative hand rehabilitation on an empirical basis. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether referral criteria after surgery because of Dupuytren's disease were actually adhered to, and, to analyse differences in outcomes between patients who were referred according to the criteria (correctly referred) and those who were not referred but should have been (incorrectly not referred). METHODS: Referral pattern was evaluated prospectively in 46 patients. Total active/passive range of joint motion (TAM/ TPM), sensibility, pinch force, Disability Arm Shoulder Hand questionnaire (DASH) and Michigan Hand outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) were used as outcome measures preoperatively and 10 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In total 21 patients were referred correctly and 17 patients were incorrectly not referred. Significant improvements on TAM/TPM, DASH and MHQ were found at follow-up for the total group. No differences in outcomes were found between patients correctly referred and patients incorrectly not referred for postoperative hand therapy. CONCLUSION: Referral criteria were not adhered to. Given the lack of differences in outcomes between patients correctly referred and patients incorrectly not referred, postoperative hand therapy in Dupuytren's disease should be reconsidered.