RESUMEN
The present article describes a novel surgical technique of a primary mini-capsulorhexis in midperiphery to minimize surgical complications in white intumescent cataracts. Patients with white mature cataracts with a convex anterior capsule or swollen lens fibers were selected. An initial puncture was made 3-4 mm away from the center, in the midperipheral anterior capsule, with a conventional cystitome. A mini-capsulorhexis (2-2.5 mm) was created. Loose cortical matter and fluidic contents were aspirated to reduce the intralenticular pressure. Two cuts were made at the margin of the mini-capsulorhexis, and an adequately sized secondary rhexis was completed, after which phacoemulsification was done. A circular curvilinear capsulorhexis was successfully achieved in all cases, including those with a small pupil. Rhexis could be completed in a patient where an initial extension occurred due to head movement. This refined technique aims to enhance the safety and precision of capsulorhexis in intumescent cataracts, thereby reducing the risk of complications such as the Argentinian flag sign. Further exploration and validation of this approach through clinical trials are warranted to establish its efficacy and safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Capsulorrexis , Catarata , Facoemulsificación , Humanos , Facoemulsificación/métodos , Capsulorrexis/métodos , Catarata/complicaciones , Femenino , Agudeza Visual , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Choroidal hyperreflective foci (HCF) are novel spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) biomarkers in diabetic macular edema (DME). The present study intended to validate HCF and assess their role in the treatment outcome. METHODS: It was a retrospective, longitudinal, records-based pilot study recruiting consecutive patients of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy with treatment naïve DME. Patients were treated with three intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections and followed by a pro re nata regimen. RESULTS: A total of 43 eyes of 28 patients were included in the study. Eyes were divided into two groups. Group A (n = 19) comprised eyes with retinal hyperreflective foci (HRF) and group B (n = 24) had eyes with both HRF and HCF. The mean age of patients in group A and B was 58.5 ± 2.1 years and 55.2 ± 8.8 years, respectively. Mean best-corrected visual acuity at presentation was 0.38 ± 0.25 in group A and 0.59 ± 0.29 in group B (P = 0.01). Final BCVA was 0.35 ± 0.39 in group A and 0.47 ± 0.34 in group B (P = 0.3). External limiting membrane was intact in 19 out of 19 eyes in group A and two (8.3%) eyes in group B (P = 0). CONCLUSION: Presence of HCF meant significantly worse initial BCVA compared to the eye that had HRF alone. The final BCVA was also worse in eyes with HCF compared to those with HRF and without HCF; however, the difference did not reach a significance level, probably pointing toward the fact that HCF and HRF are pathophysiologically identical. Further studies with a larger sample size and prospective design are needed to take these findings forward.