Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Pharm X ; 7: 100239, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545329

RESUMEN

A network of regulatory innovations brings a holistic approach to improving the submission, assessment, and lifecycle management of pharmaceutical quality information in the U.S. This dedicated effort in the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) aims to enhance the quality assessment of submissions for new drugs, generic drugs, and biological products including biosimilars. These regulatory innovations include developing or contributing: (i) the Knowledge-Aided Assessment and Structured Application (KASA), (ii) a new common technical document for quality (ICH M4Q(R2)), (iii) structured data on Pharmaceutical Quality/Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (PQ/CMC), (iv) Integrated Quality Assessment (IQA), (v) the Quality Surveillance Dashboard (QSD), and (vi) the Established Conditions tool from the ICH Q12 guideline. The innovations collectively drive CDER toward a more coordinated, effective, and efficient quality assessment. Improvements are made possible by structured regulatory submissions, a systems approach to quality risk management, and data-driven decisions based on science, risk, and effective knowledge management. The intended result is better availability of quality medicines for U.S. patients.

2.
AAPS J ; 15(3): 623-8, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23512727

RESUMEN

The Nanotechnology Risk Assessment Working Group in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) within the United States Food and Drug Administration was established to assess the possible impact of nanotechnology on drug products. The group is in the process of performing risk assessment and management exercises. The task of the working group is to identify areas where CDER may need to optimize its review practices and to develop standards to ensure review consistency for drug applications that may involve the application of nanotechnology. The working group already performed risk management exercises evaluating the potential risks from administering nanomaterial active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) or nanomaterial excipients by various routes of administration. This publication outlines the risk assessment and management process used by the working group, using nanomaterial API by the oral route of administration as an example.


Asunto(s)
Aprobación de Drogas/métodos , Nanoestructuras/normas , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/normas , Evaluación de Medicamentos/métodos , Evaluación de Medicamentos/normas , Humanos , Nanoestructuras/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA