RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with immunomodulators or biologic therapy are at increased risk of infections. Malnutrition and vitamin or mineral deficiencies are common among patients with IBD. The results of various studies have indicate that vitamin deficiencies might increase the risk of infections. To evaluate the efficacy of a multivitamin and mineral supplement on the incidence of infections in patients with IBD treated with immunomodulators, biologic therapy, or combination therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to compare a multivitamin and mineral supplement (supplemented group) vs identical-in-appearance placebo (placebo group) in a total of 320 non-vitamin-deficient patients with IBD (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis) in remission with immunomodulators, biologic therapy, or combination therapy. Participants were asked to take a daily multivitamin and mineral supplement or placebo and report the occurrence of infections during a 24-week period of follow-up. RESULTS: Treatment arms consisted of 162 and 158 patients for the supplement and placebo, respectively. In both treatment groups, 107 patients reported an infection during the 24-week follow-up period (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.48). In the supplemented group, 32 patients received antibiotics for an infection compared with 21 patients in the placebo group (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.93). CONCLUSIONS: An over-the-counter multivitamin and mineral supplement did not reduce the risk of infection for patients with IBD in remission with immunomodulators, biologic therapy, or combination therapy.
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at increased risk of infections due to vitamin or mineral deficiencies. An over-the-counter supplement did not reduce the risk of infection for patients with inflammatory bowel disease in remission with immunomodulators and/or biologic therapy.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Moderate alcohol consumption is associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes. This reduced risk might be explained by improved insulin sensitivity or improved glycemic status, but results of intervention studies on this relation are inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies investigating the effect of alcohol consumption on insulin sensitivity and glycemic status. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched up to August 2014. Intervention studies on the effect of alcohol consumption on biological markers of insulin sensitivity or glycemic status of at least 2 weeks' duration were included. Investigators extracted data on study characteristics, outcome measures, and methodological quality. RESULTS: Fourteen intervention studies were included in a meta-analysis of six glycemic end points. Alcohol consumption did not influence estimated insulin sensitivity (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.08 [-0.09 to 0.24]) or fasting glucose (SMD 0.07 [-0.11 to 0.24]) but reduced HbA1c (SMD -0.62 [-1.01 to -0.23]) and fasting insulin concentrations (SMD -0.19 [-0.35 to -0.02]) compared with the control condition. Alcohol consumption among women reduced fasting insulin (SMD -0.23 [-0.41 to -0.04]) and tended to improve insulin sensitivity (SMD 0.16 [-0.04 to 0.37]) but not among men. Results were similar after excluding studies with high alcohol dosages (>40 g/day) and were not influenced by dosage and duration of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although the studies had small sample sizes and were of short duration, the current evidence suggests that moderate alcohol consumption may decrease fasting insulin and HbA1c concentrations among nondiabetic subjects. Alcohol consumption might improve insulin sensitivity among women but did not do so overall.