RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We used a data-driven methodology to decrease the departmental surgical site infection rate to a goal of 1%. METHODS: A prospective interventional study with historical controls comparing preimplementation/intervention (unknown methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA]/methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA] status and standard weight and drug allergy-based preoperative antibiotics) with postimplementation/intervention (optimized preoperative chlorhexidine showers, MSSA/MRSA screening, MSSA/MRSA decolonization, and optimized preoperative antibiotic order set implementation). The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used for case surveillance. The primary outcome was the presence of a surgical site infection with a secondary outcome of cost(s) of implementation. RESULTS: A total of 317 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program abstracted neurosurgical cases were analyzed, 163 cases before implementation and 154 cases after implementation. There were no significant differences between the preimplementation and postimplementation cohorts regarding patient demographics and baseline comorbidities, with the exceptions of inpatient and functional status (P < 0.001). The most common procedures were lumbar decompression (31%), lumbar discectomy (27%), and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (10.4%). After implementation, 30 patients were MSSA positive (20%) and 4 MRSA positive (2.6%). Thirty patients received preoperative intranasal mupirocin decolonization (88%), and 4 patients received adjusted preoperative antibiotics (12%). After protocol implementation, the surgical site infection rate decreased from 6.7% (odds ratio, 2.82) to 0.96% (odds ratio, 0.91). The cost of implementation was $27,179, or $58 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the importance of systematically investigating areas of gap in existing clinical practice and quality improvement projects to increase patient safety and enhance the value of care delivered to neurosurgical patients.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Anciano , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Desinfectantes/uso terapéutico , Discectomía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/economía , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Fusión Vertebral , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/economía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The first documented case of COVID-19 in the United States occurred on January 30th, 2020. Soon after, a global pandemic was declared in March 2020 with each state issuing stay at home orders based on population, risk for community transmission and current number of positive cases. A priority for each region was to develop efficient systems for testing large patient volumes in a safe manner to reduce the risk of community transmission. A community based United States health care system in the upper mid-west implemented a drive through testing site in an attempt to divert suspected cases of COVID-19 away from larger patient areas while protecting staff and patients. This commentary outlines the planning, work flow and challenges of implementing this drive through testing site in a rural community setting.