RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Administration of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) is necessary for preventing extracorporeal circuit thrombosis during hemodialysis. A substantial amount of LMWH is removed with online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) when administered through the inlet site of the extracorporeal circuit. Consequently, administration of LMWH at the outlet site appears to be more efficient. In this study we aimed to compare the effects of nadroparin calcium (NAD) administered through the outlet versus the inlet port site in postdilution OL-HDF and assess the NAD dose reduction. METHODS: Forty-nine hemodialysis patients were included in 3 consecutive 6-week studies as follows: phase I, inlet port line; phase II, outlet port line; and phase III, outlet port line with reduced dose. We evaluated clotting in the hemodialyzer and venous bubble trap, the dialysis dose (K t/V), and substitution volume. RESULTS: Thirty four percent, 63%, and 66% were categorized as "white" during phases I, II, and III, respectively. During phases I, II, and III, 75%, 93%, and 95% of the venous bubble traps were "clean," and 9%, 0.6%, and 0.4% of the dialyzers clotted, respectively. Average NAD dose was 0.43 ml during phase I and 0.3 ml during phase II. During phase III, the LMWH dose was reduced by 33% to 50% in 15 patients. In phase III, Kt/V improved from 1.64 to 1.75 and substitution volume increased from 20.18 to 21.96 L. CONCLUSIONS: When using OL-HDF, a single administration of NAD at the outlet port line allows for a significant dose reduction and was associated with improved dialysis performance.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is frequent in haemodialysis (HD) patients. Oral cinacalcet-hydrochloride (HCl) decreases parathyroid hormone (PTH); however, real-life PTH data, according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, are still lacking. Our goal is to assess the percentage of cinacalcet-HCl-treated HD patients with controlled SHPT (PTH <9× upper limit of the normal range) after 12 months (M12) of treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study in HD patients with SHPT treated by cinacalcet-HCl between 2005 and 2015 and dialysed in seven French HD centres using the same database (Hemodial™). RESULTS: The study included 1268 patients with a mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 21 ± 12 months. Their mean dialysis vintage was 4.3 ± 5.6 years. PTH values were available and exploitable at M12 in 50% of them (645 patients). Among these patients, 58.9% had controlled (mean PTH of 304 ± 158 pg/mL) and 41.1% uncontrolled SHPT (mean PTH of 1084 ± 543) at M12. At the baseline, patients with controlled SHPT were older (66 ± 15 versus 61 ± 17 years), and had lower PTH (831 ± 346 versus 1057 ± 480 pg/mL) and calcaemia (2.18 ± 0.2 versus 2.22 ± 0.19 mmol/L) than uncontrolled patients. In multivariate analysis, these three factors still remained significantly associated with controlled SHPT. CONCLUSION: In this real-life study, 41.1% of HD patients with SHPT treated with cinacalcet-HCl remained with a PTH above the KDIGO recommended target after 12 months of treatment. Apart from the possibility of non-compliance, the severity of SHPT appears to be a major factor determining the response to cinacalcet-HCl treatment, reinforcing the importance of treating SHPT at earlier stages.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to report our clinical hemodialysis experience using a percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) created with the Ellipsys® vascular access system. This pAVF device creates a permanent AVF anastomosis between the proximal radial artery (PRA) and the deep communicating vein (DCV) in the proximal forearm. METHODS: The medical records of all patients with a pAVF were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical data analyzed included reliability of pAVF use, quality of dialysis, rate and success of puncture, and pAVF related complications, along with incidence of subsequent interventions. FINDINGS: Between May 2017 and November 2018, 34 patients had a pAVF created with technical success in 33 patients (97%). Twenty-eight out of 34 (82%) patients had successful two-needle cannulation within 10 days to 6 weeks after pAVF creation. The mean Kt/v was 1.6 (1.2-2) and the average recirculation was 10%. Fifteen patients (44%) needed no further access intervention. Twelve patients (35%) required an additional procedure to assist maturation of the pAVF in order to facilitate puncture. The average blood flow measured at the brachial artery, before the first cannulation, was 850 ml/min. From causes unrelated to the procedure, four patients died during the follow-up study. Two patients required revision to a surgical AVF. None of the pAVFs developed aneurysmal degeneration steal syndrome, or high access flow related issues. DISCUSSION: The Ellipsys® pAVF offers a safe and functional vascular access for hemodialysis. Advantages included prompt access maturation, avoidance of high flow AVFs, and a simple nonsurgical procedure with high patient satisfaction. Functional outcomes are equivalent and likely better than surgical fistulas. There appears to be less aneurysmal degeneration and need for future re-intervention. Objective dialysis parameters indicate excellent quality of hemodialysis for the patient.