RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It has been speculated that freestanding emergency departments (FEDs) draw more affluent, better-insured patients away from urban hospital EDs. It is believed that this leaves urban hospital-based EDs less financially secure. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether the distribution of patients with four types of insurance (self-pay, Medicaid, Medicare, and private) at the main ED changed after opening three affiliated FEDs, and whether the insurance type distribution was different between main ED and FEDs and between individual FEDs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of insurance status of all patients presenting to our EDs from July 2006 through August 2013. Insurance was divided into self-pay, Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance across three time periods, which reflect the sequential opening of each FED. Insurance types for each facility were compared for individual time periods and across time periods. χ2 was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: In the three studied time frames (periods B, C, and D), there were less privately insured patients and more self-pay, Medicaid, and Medicare patients at the main than at each FED (p < 0.001). Insurance types were significantly different between each of the three FEDs and the main ED (p < 0.001) and between each of the three FEDs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were less privately insured patients and more self-pay, Medicaid, and Medicare patients at the main ED compared to the FEDs. Privately insured patients decreased at both the FEDs and main ED during the study. Insurance distribution was significantly different between the main ED, and three FEDs, and between individual FEDs.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Freestanding emergency departments (FEDs) have grown in popularity. They often provide emergent care in areas distant from other EDs. Investigations and research to characterize the operation and dynamics of FEDs are needed. This study characterizes the severity of illness seen at FEDs and compares it with a hospital-based urban tertiary care ED using the emergency severity index (ESI), a quantification of patient acuity. METHODS: Patient ESI levels were analyzed retrospectively over 1 year for a single hospital system with 1 main urban hospital-based ED and 3 FEDs. Data analysis was completed using analysis of variance with and without time as a factor. RESULTS: The average ESI level at the main ED (3.04) was lower than the FEDs, respectively (3.42, 3.22, and 3.38) (P < .001). Patient ESI levels were significantly different between FEDs (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The main ED demonstrated lower ESI levels and thus higher acuity than the 3 affiliated FEDs. There were significantly different acuity levels between the main ED and 3 FEDs as well as between individual FEDs.