RESUMEN
The Indian Health Service provides care to remote and under-resourced communities in the United States. American Indian/Alaska Native patients have some of the highest morbidity and mortality among any ethnic group in the United States. Starting in the 1980s, the IHS implemented the Resource and Patient Management System health information technology (HIT) platform to improve efficiency and quality to address these disparities. The IHS is currently assessing the Resource and Patient Management System to ensure that changing health information needs are met. HIT assessments have traditionally focused on cost, reimbursement opportunities, infrastructure, required or desired functionality, and the ability to meet provider needs. Little information exists on frameworks that assess HIT legacy systems to determine solutions for an integrated rural healthcare system whose end goal is health equity. This search for a next-generation HIT solution for a historically underserved population presents a unique opportunity to envision and redefine HIT that supports health equity as its core mission.
Asunto(s)
Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska , Equidad en Salud , Informática Médica/organización & administración , United States Indian Health Service/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Informática Médica/historia , Estados Unidos , United States Indian Health Service/historiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To understand the use of electronic health record (EHR) functionalities by physicians practicing in an underserved setting. DATA SOURCE/STUDY SETTING: A total of 333 Indian Health Service physicians (55 percent response rate) in August 2012. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. DATA COLLECTION: The survey assessed routine use of EHR functionalities, perceived usefulness, and barriers to adoption. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Physicians routinely used a median 7 of 10 EHR functionalities targeted by the Meaningful Use program, but only 5 percent used all 10. Most (63 percent) felt the EHR improved quality of care. Many (76 percent) reported increased documentation time and poorer quality patient-physician interactions (45 percent). Primary care specialty and time using the EHR were positively associated with use of EHR functionalities, while perceived productivity loss was negatively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Significant opportunities exist to increase use of EHR functionalities and preserve physician-patient interactions and productivity in a resource-limited environment.
Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Uso Significativo , United States Indian Health Service , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Difusión de Innovaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: There are limited data regarding implementing electronic health records (EHR) in underserved settings. We evaluated the implementation of an EHR within the Indian Health Service (IHS), a federally funded health system for Native Americans. DESIGN: We surveyed 223 primary care clinicians practicing at 26 IHS health centers that implemented an EHR between 2003 and 2005. METHODS: The survey instrument assessed clinician attitudes regarding EHR implementation, current utilization of individual EHR functions, and attitudes regarding the use of information technology to improve quality of care in underserved settings. We fit a multivariable logistic regression model to identify correlates of increased utilization of the EHR. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 56%. Of responding clinicians, 66% felt that the EHR implementation process was positive. One-third (35%) believed that the EHR improved overall quality of care, with many (39%) feeling that it decreased the quality of the patient-doctor interaction. One-third of clinicians (34%) reported consistent use of electronic reminders, and self-report that EHRs improve quality was strongly associated with increased utilization of the EHR (odds ratio 3.03, 95% confidence interval 1.05-8.8). The majority (87%) of clinicians felt that information technology could potentially improve quality of care in rural and underserved settings through the use of tools such as online information sources, telemedicine programs, and electronic health records. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians support the use of information technology to improve quality in underserved settings, but many felt that it was not currently fulfilling its potential in the IHS, potentially due to limited use of key functions within the EHR.