RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To provide insights for nutrition and public health practitioners on how to engage with other sectors to achieve public health goals. Specifically, this study provides lessons from the example of integrating family farming and a nutrition into a legal framework in Brazil on how to successfully shift other sectors toward nutrition goals. METHODS: The study analyzed policy processes that led to a Brazilian law linking family farming with the National School Feeding Program. Main actors involved with the development of the law were interviewed and their narratives were analyzed using a well-established theoretical framework. RESULTS: The study provides five key lessons for promoting intersectorality. First, nutrition and health practitioners can afford to embrace bold ideas when working with other sectors. Second, they should engage with more powerful sectors (or subsectors) and position nutrition goals as providing solutions that meet the interests of these sector. Third is the need to focus on a common goal - which may not be explicitly nutrition-related - as the focus of the intersectoral action. Fourth, philosophical, political, and governance spaces are needed to bring together different sectors. Fifth, evidence on the success of the intersectoral approach increases the acceptance of the process. CONCLUSIONS: This study on policy processes shows how a convergence of factors enabled a link between family farming and school feeding in Brazil. It highlights that there are strategies to engage other sectors toward nutrition goals which provides benefits for all sectors involved.
Asunto(s)
Agricultura/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Alimentación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Política Nutricional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Instituciones Académicas , Brasil , Servicios de Alimentación/tendencias , Regulación Gubernamental , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Política Nutricional/tendencias , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To provide insights for nutrition and public health practitioners on how to engage with other sectors to achieve public health goals. Specifically, this study provides lessons from the example of integrating family farming and a nutrition into a legal framework in Brazil on how to successfully shift other sectors toward nutrition goals. METHODS The study analyzed policy processes that led to a Brazilian law linking family farming with the National School Feeding Program. Main actors involved with the development of the law were interviewed and their narratives were analyzed using a well-established theoretical framework. RESULTS The study provides five key lessons for promoting intersectorality. First, nutrition and health practitioners can afford to embrace bold ideas when working with other sectors. Second, they should engage with more powerful sectors (or subsectors) and position nutrition goals as providing solutions that meet the interests of these sector. Third is the need to focus on a common goal - which may not be explicitly nutrition-related - as the focus of the intersectoral action. Fourth, philosophical, political, and governance spaces are needed to bring together different sectors. Fifth, evidence on the success of the intersectoral approach increases the acceptance of the process. CONCLUSIONS This study on policy processes shows how a convergence of factors enabled a link between family farming and school feeding in Brazil. It highlights that there are strategies to engage other sectors toward nutrition goals which provides benefits for all sectors involved.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Instituciones Académicas , Política Nutricional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Agricultura/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Alimentación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Brasil , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Salud Pública , Política Nutricional/tendencias , Regulación Gubernamental , Servicios de Alimentación/tendencias , Promoción de la SaludRESUMEN
Reducing population salt intake has been identified as a priority intervention to reduce non-communicable diseases. Member States of the World Health Organization have agreed to a global target of a 30% reduction in salt intake by 2025. In countries where most salt consumed is from processed foods, programs to engage the food industry to reduce salt in products are being developed. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of national initiatives to encourage the food industry to reduce salt. A systematic review of the literature was supplemented by key informant questionnaires to inform categorization of the initiatives. Fifty nine food industry salt reduction programs were identified. Thirty eight countries had targets for salt levels in foods and nine countries had introduced legislation for some products. South Africa and Argentina have both introduced legislation limiting salt levels across a broad range of foods. Seventeen countries reported reductions in salt levels in foods-the majority in bread. While these trends represent progress, many countries have yet to initiate work in this area, others are at early stages of implementation and further monitoring is required to assess progress towards achieving the global target.
Asunto(s)
Comida Rápida/normas , Industria de Alimentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ingesta Diaria Recomendada/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sodio en la Dieta/normas , Argentina , Pan , Bases de Datos Factuales , SudáfricaRESUMEN
Obesity has reached epidemic proportions, in the United States as well as among its trade partners such as Mexico. It has been established that an "obesogenic" (obesity-causing) food environment is one influence on obesity prevalence. To isolate the particular role of NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, in changing Mexico's food environment, we plotted the flow of several key products between the United States and Mexico over the 14-year NAFTA period (1994-2008) and situated them in a broader historical context. Key sources of USDA data include the Foreign Agricultural Service's Global Agricultural Trade System, its official repository for current and historical data on imports, exports and re-exports, and its Production, Supply, and Distribution online database. US export data were queried for agricultural products linked to shifting diet patterns including: corn, soybeans, sugar and sweeteners, consumer-oriented products, and livestock products. The Bureau of Economic Analysis' Balance of Payments and Direct Investment Position Data in their web-based International Economic Accounts system also helped determine changes in US direct investment abroad from 1982 to 2009. Directly and indirectly, the United States has exported increasing amounts of corn, soybeans, sugar, snack foods, and meat products into Mexico over the last two decades. Facilitated by NAFTA, these exports are one important way in which US agriculture and trade policy influences Mexico's food system. Because of significant US agribusiness investment in Mexico across the full spectrum of the latter's food supply chain, from production and processing to distribution and retail, the Mexican food system increasingly looks like the industrialized food system of the United States.
Asunto(s)
Dieta , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Política Nutricional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Obesidad/etiología , Agricultura/legislación & jurisprudencia , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/economía , Humanos , México , Obesidad/epidemiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Transition to diets that are high in saturated fat and sugar has caused a global public health concern, as the pattern of food consumption is a major modifiable risk factor for chronic non-communicable diseases. Although agri-food systems are intimately associated with this transition, agriculture and health sectors are largely disconnected in their priorities, policy, and analysis, with neither side considering the complex inter-relation between agri-trade, patterns of food consumption, health, and development. We show the importance of connection of these perspectives through estimation of the eff ect of adopting a healthy diet on population health, agricultural production, trade, the economy, and livelihoods,with a computable general equilibrium approach. On the basis of case-studies from the UK and Brazil, we suggest that benefits of a healthy diet policy will vary substantially between different populations, not only because of population dietary intake but also because of agricultural production, trade, and other economic factors.
Asunto(s)
Agricultura , Economía , Conducta Alimentaria , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Necesidades Nutricionales , Brasil , Enfermedad Crónica/prevención & control , Salud Global , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Política Nutricional , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
Sugar-sweetened beverages are widely believed to be contributing to the growing prevalence of overweight and obesity around the world. One of the channels used by industry to encourage greater consumption and preferences for soft drinks is schools. But governments around the world are taking action to limit the availability of soft drinks in schools. More than 30 national and subnational governmental bodies have made efforts to restrict availability, and the soft drinks industry has also taken some limited voluntary action. Most government-led efforts-with some exceptions-restrict the availability of any drink with added sugar, but the voluntary pledges take less-restrictive approaches. There is little consensus on artificially sweetened drinks. Policies vary in other ways, too, presenting an opportunity to study the effects of different policy approaches on short- and long-term consumption and attitudes. In the meantime, the widespread condemnation of soft drinks in schools suggests that it is within the industry's interests to take more comprehensive action.
Asunto(s)
Bebidas Gaseosas , Instituciones Académicas , Bebidas Gaseosas/efectos adversos , Bebidas Gaseosas/provisión & distribución , Niño , Industria de Alimentos , Salud Global , Agencias Gubernamentales , Política de Salud , Humanos , Obesidad/prevención & control , Investigación , Instituciones Académicas/organización & administraciónAsunto(s)
Embalaje de Alimentos , Mercadotecnía/métodos , Psicología Infantil , Publicidad , Niño , Comunicación , Toma de Decisiones , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify potential impacts of the Central America-Dominican Republic-Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) on food consumption patterns associated with the nutrition transition, obesity, and diet-related chronic diseases. METHODS: Examination of CAFTA-DR agreement to identify measures that have the potential to affect food availability and retail prices. RESULTS: CAFTA-DR includes agreements on tariffs, tariff-rate quotas (TRQs), and sanitary and phytosanitary regulations with direct implications for the availability and prices of various foods. Agreements on investment, services, and intellectual property rights (IPR) are also relevant because they create a business climate more conducive to long-term investment by the transnational food industry. Trade liberalization under CAFTA-DR is likely to increase availability and lower relative prices of two food groups associated with the nutrition transition: meat and processed foods. These outcomes are expected to occur as the direct result of increased imports from the United States and increased production by U.S. companies based in Central America, and the indirect result of increased domestic meat production (due to increased availability of cheaper animal feed) and increased production of processed foods by domestic companies (due to a more competitive market environment). CONCLUSIONS: CAFTA-DR is likely to further the nutrition transition in Central America by increasing the consumption of meat; highly processed foods; and new, non-traditional foods. The public health community should be more aware of the implications of trade agreements for dietary health. Governments and related stakeholders should assess the coherence between changes fostered by specific trade agreements with national policies on diet and nutrition.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Desarrollo Económico , Obesidad , Enfermedad Crónica , Trastornos Nutricionales , Economía , República Dominicana , América CentralRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify potential impacts of the Central America-Dominican Republic-Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) on food consumption patterns associated with the nutrition transition, obesity, and diet-related chronic diseases. METHODS: Examination of CAFTA-DR agreement to identify measures that have the potential to affect food availability and retail prices. RESULTS: CAFTA-DR includes agreements on tariffs, tariff-rate quotas (TRQs), and sanitary and phytosanitary regulations with direct implications for the availability and prices of various foods. Agreements on investment, services, and intellectual property rights (IPR) are also relevant because they create a business climate more conducive to long-term investment by the transnational food industry. Trade liberalization under CAFTA-DR is likely to increase availability and lower relative prices of two food groups associated with the nutrition transition: meat and processed foods. These outcomes are expected to occur as the direct result of increased imports from the United States and increased production by U.S. companies based in Central America, and the indirect result of increased domestic meat production (due to increased availability of cheaper animal feed) and increased production of processed foods by domestic companies (due to a more competitive market environment). CONCLUSIONS: CAFTA-DR is likely to further the nutrition transition in Central America by increasing the consumption of meat; highly processed foods; and new, non-traditional foods. The public health community should be more aware of the implications of trade agreements for dietary health. Governments and related stakeholders should assess the coherence between changes fostered by specific trade agreements with national policies on diet and nutrition.
OBJETIVOS: Identificar el posible impacto del Tratado de Libre Comercio entre Centroamérica y República Dominicana (TLCCA-RD) sobre el patrón de consumo de alimentos relacionados con la transición alimentaria, la obesidad y las enfermedades crónicas asociadas con la alimentación. MÉTODOS: Se examinó el TLCCA-RD para identificar las medidas que podrían afectar a la disponibilidad de alimentos y los precios al consumidor. RESULTADOS: El TLCCA-RD contiene acuerdos sobre tarifas, cuotas arancelarias y regulaciones sanitarias y fitosanitarias con implicaciones directas sobre la disponibilidad y los precios de varios alimentos. Los acuerdos sobre inversión, servicios y derechos de propiedad intelectual son también importantes debido a que crean un ambiente de negocios más favorable a inversiones a largo plazo de empresas transnacionales de la industria alimentaria. La liberalización del comercio por el TLCCA-RD podría incrementar la disponibilidad y reducir los precios relativos de dos grupos de alimentos asociados con la transición alimentaria: las carnes y los alimentos procesados. Esto podría ser resultado directo del aumento en las importaciones desde los Estados Unidos de América y de la producción de las compañías estadounidenses basadas en Centroamérica, y resultado indirecto del aumento en la producción local de carne (por la mayor disponibilidad de alimentos más baratos para animales) y el aumento en la producción de alimentos procesados por compañías locales (debido a un ambiente comercial más competitivo). CONCLUSIONES: El TLCCA-RD podría reforzar la transición alimentaria en Centroamérica al elevar el consumo de carne, alimentos muy procesados y alimentos nuevos no tradicionales. La comunidad de salud pública debe estar más atenta a las implicaciones de los acuerdos comerciales sobre la salud alimentaria. Los Gobiernos y las entidades relacionadas con el tema deben evaluar la coherencia entre los cambios propiciados por los acuerdos comerciales específicos y las políticas alimentarias y dietéticas nacionales
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Comercio , Dieta/tendencias , Cooperación Internacional , América Central , Productos Agrícolas , República Dominicana , CarneRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify potential impacts of the Central America-Dominican Republic-Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) on food consumption patterns associated with the nutrition transition, obesity, and diet-related chronic diseases. METHODS: Examination of CAFTA-DR agreement to identify measures that have the potential to affect food availability and retail prices. RESULTS: CAFTA-DR includes agreements on tariffs, tariff-rate quotas (TRQs), and sanitary and phytosanitary regulations with direct implications for the availability and prices of various foods. Agreements on investment, services, and intellectual property rights (IPR) are also relevant because they create a business climate more conducive to long-term investment by the transnational food industry. Trade liberalization under CAFTA-DR is likely to increase availability and lower relative prices of two food groups associated with the nutrition transition: meat and processed foods. These outcomes are expected to occur as the direct result of increased imports from the United States and increased production by U.S. companies based in Central America, and the indirect result of increased domestic meat production (due to increased availability of cheaper animal feed) and increased production of processed foods by domestic companies (due to a more competitive market environment). CONCLUSIONS: CAFTA-DR is likely to further the nutrition transition in Central America by increasing the consumption of meat; highly processed foods; and new, non-traditional foods. The public health community should be more aware of the implications of trade agreements for dietary health. Governments and related stakeholders should assess the coherence between changes fostered by specific trade agreements with national policies on diet and nutrition.