RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a specialized inpatient rehabilitation program in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy (NDE), who had been referred within 1 year after diagnosis. METHODS: We performed an open, prospective, controlled study comparing a 1-year follow-up assessment of patients with NDE after completing a rehabilitation program at an epilepsy center (rehabilitation group) with a control group of patients with similar epilepsy duration, but without rehabilitation in the first year after diagnosis. Primary outcome measures comprised emotional adaptation to epilepsy, depression and anxiety; and secondary outcome measures were overall quality of life (QoL), overall health, perceived restrictions because of epilepsy, level of information about epilepsy, and employment status. RESULTS: Comparison of the admission data of 74 rehabilitation group patients (mean age and SD 47.7 ± 13.0 years) with the pre-rehabilitation assessment of 56 control patients (45.5 ± 12.1 years) revealed no significant differences concerning sociodemographic and health data. Comparison of the follow-up assessment of the rehabilitation group and the pre-rehabilitation assessment of the control group showed significantly better values for the rehabilitation group on emotional adaptation to epilepsy (p = .003), overall QoL (p = .006) and overall health (p = .011), perceived restrictions because of epilepsy, and subjective level of information about epilepsy (both p's < .001). There were no statistically significant differences concerning depression and anxiety or employment status (all p's > .50). One year after rehabilitation, patients in the rehabilitation group were more often seizure-free and less often on sickness absence than control group patients (both p's < .001). SIGNIFICANCE: Since reduced QoL shortly after diagnosis of NDE is associated with seizure recurrence, an early identification of patients with a greater need for support seems important. This epilepsy-related rehabilitation program showed lasting effects on several aspects of adaptation to epilepsy and QoL.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Epilepsia/rehabilitación , Epilepsia/psicología , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Internos/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adaptación Psicológica , Depresión/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a specialized inpatient rehabilitation program in patients with early in comparison with chronic epilepsy. METHODS: We performed a prospective, open pre/post study using a parallel group design. Patients with early epilepsy (EE, treatment with anti-seizure medication [ASM] ≤ 1 year) or with chronic epilepsy (CE, ASM treatment > 5 years) completed questionnaires at the time of their admission to the rehabilitation program and at discharge. Outcome measures comprised scales from the PESOS questionnaire (PErformance, SOciodemographic aspects, Subjective estimation; e.g., emotional adaptation to epilepsy) as well as screening instruments for depression (Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy, NDDI-E) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, GAD-7). Linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to determine the effects of the program in the total group and to compare the effects between patients with EE and CE. RESULTS: The analyses included 79 patients with EE and 157 patients with CE. Baseline comparisons revealed differences in disease-related and sociodemographic variables (e.g., patients with EE were older, those with CE had a higher seizure frequency and a higher rate of unemployment; all p < .01). LMMs showed significant improvements in emotional adaptation to epilepsy, depression, anxiety, overall quality of life and overall health as well as in perceived overall restrictions because of epilepsy and the subjective level of information about epilepsy (all p < .001). Despite the different duration of epilepsy, baseline levels as well as improvements did not differ between patients with EE and CE (all p > .05) except for the perceived level of information, which was significantly lower in patients with EE at admission and improved to a higher extent in this group (both p < .001). CONCLUSION: Both patients with EE and patients with CE who are referred to a specialized comprehensive rehabilitation program benefit from the participation in this program with respect to emotional adaptation to epilepsy, aspects of quality of life, and level of information about epilepsy.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Pacientes Internos , Estudios Prospectivos , Epilepsia/psicología , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/psicologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to assess the management of drug intake and potential barriers to adherence reported by two different patient groups. METHODS: The study was performed in cooperation with the Regional Chamber of Pharmacists of Rhineland-Palatinate and three neurologists in private practice specialized in epileptology. In total, 108 patients surveyed in 43 pharmacies (Group P) and 118 patients treated by the specialized neurologists (Group N) completed anonymously a questionnaire on intake of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The statistical evaluation was performed using nonparametric tests and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Group N more often used adherence aids, compared with Group P (68.6% vs. 46.3%, p<0.01), and the number of doses per day was significantly lower in Group N (Mann-Whitney test, p=0.046), but the percentage of patients who reported problems with the regular intake of their medication did not differ significantly between groups (Group N vs. P: 47.0% vs. 40.0%). If patients noticed that they missed a dose, 45.3% completely skipped the missed dose (Group N vs. P: 43.0% vs. 48.1%, n.s.). In a multivariate analysis, significant risk factors of problems with regular drug intake were age<25yrs. (p<0.01) and patient-reported adverse effect of AED (p<0.01), followed by the number of AED doses per day (p<0.05), while gender, intake habits, usage of adherence aids, and patient-rated efficacy of AEDs were not significant. CONCLUSION: Patients treated by neurologists specialized in epileptology did not report less problems with adherence than patients surveyed in pharmacies. Since barriers for a regular intake are diverse, the use of a short questionnaire on management of drug intake may lead to an individually tailored counseling of patients to improve adherence.