RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study was an evaluation of whether sildenafil citrate is effective for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in men taking concomitant serotonin-reuptake-inhibiting antidepressants. METHOD: A retrospective subanalysis of combined data from 10 phase II/III double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed- and flexible-dose trials (12-26 weeks) identified a group of men with erectile dysfunction receiving 5 to 200 mg/day of sildenafil (N=65) or placebo (N=33) and concomitant serotonin-reuptake-inhibiting antidepressants. Efficacy was measured by responses to questions from the International Index of Erectile Function on ability to achieve erection, ability to maintain erection, ejaculation frequency, orgasm frequency, and sexual desire. RESULTS: Patients with erectile dysfunction receiving sildenafil and concomitant serotonergic antidepressants had significantly greater improvements in ability to achieve and maintain an erection, frequency of ejaculation, and orgasm frequency than did patients receiving placebo, without increased sexual desire. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil significantly improved erectile dysfunction in patients taking concomitant serotonergic antidepressants.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Disfunción Eréctil/inducido químicamente , Disfunción Eréctil/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Purinas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Citrato de Sildenafil , Sulfonas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The nosology of chronic depression has become increasingly complex since the publication of the revised third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987), but there are few data available to evaluate the validity of the distinctions between the subtypes of chronic depression. The validity of the distinction between DSM-III-R chronic major depression (CMD) and major depression superimposed on dysthymia (double depression, DD) was examined. Participants were 635 patients with chronic depression in a 12-week trial of antidepressant medications. Patients with CMD, DD, and a 3rd group with a chronic major depressive episode superimposed on dysthymia (DD/CMD) were compared on demographic and clinical characteristics, family history, and response to treatment. Few differences were evident, although the depression of patients with DD/CMD tended to be more severe.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Distímico/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Trastorno Distímico/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The authors examined gender differences in treatment response to sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), and to imipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant, in chronic depression. METHOD: A total of 235 male and 400 female outpatients with DSM-III-R chronic major depression or double depression (i.e., major depression superimposed on dysthymia) were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with sertraline or with imipramine after placebo washout. RESULTS: Women were significantly more likely to show a favorable response to sertraline than to imipramine, and men were significantly more likely to show a favorable response to imipramine than to sertraline. Gender and type of medication were also significantly related to dropout rates; women who were taking imipramine and men who were taking sertraline were more likely to withdraw from the study. Gender differences in time to response were seen with imipramine, with women responding significantly more slowly than men. Comparison of treatment response rates by menopausal status showed that premenopausal women responded significantly better to sertraline than to imipramine and that postmenopausal women had similar rates of response to the two medications. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women with chronic depression show differential responsivity to and tolerability of SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants. The differing response rates between the drug classes in women was observed primarily in premenopausal women. Thus, female sex hormones may enhance response to SSRIs or inhibit response to tricyclics. Both gender and menopausal status should be considered when choosing an appropriate antidepressant for a depressed patient.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Imipramina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Sertralina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria , Enfermedad Crónica , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Método Doble Ciego , Trastorno Distímico/diagnóstico , Trastorno Distímico/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Distímico/psicología , Estrógenos/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Placebos , Premenopausia/fisiología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pretreatment psychosocial functioning of women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) and the effect of sertraline treatment on psychosocial functioning in these patients. METHOD: Two hundred forty-three women recruited from 12 university-affiliated sites and meeting DSM-IV criteria for PMDD completed 1 cycle of single-blind placebo and were randomly assigned to flexible dose sertraline or placebo for 3 cycles. Psychosocial functioning was assessed by the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP), the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS), and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q). RESULTS: SAS scores during the follicular phase were similar to SAS scores of community norms, whereas the pretreatment SAS and Q-LES-Q scores during the luteal phase were similar to scores of women with depressive disorders. Sertraline was significantly more effective than placebo in improving psychosocial functioning as measured by the SAS, the Q-LES-Q, and the 3 DRSP items of impaired productivity, interference with social activities, and interference with relationships with others. Improvement in psychosocial functioning assessed by SAS and Q-LES-Q correlated with improvement in symptomatology assessed by the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Remitters (CGI-I score of 1) were more likely to function better at baseline and showed larger improvements in functioning and quality of life with treatment compared with nonremitters. CONCLUSION: Sertraline was superior to placebo in improving psychosocial functioning in women with PMDD as reflected by SAS, Q-LES-Q, and DRSP measures. Functional improvement correlated with improvement in premenstrual symptomatology and was apparent by the second cycle of treatment. Comparison of pretreatment SAS scores in women with PMDD with the scores of other populations of women documents the degree of luteal phase functional impairment in women with PMDD and a relative absence of follicular phase impairment.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Síndrome Premenstrual/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Premenstrual/psicología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Sertralina/uso terapéutico , Ajuste Social , Adulto , Femenino , Fase Folicular , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Fase Luteínica , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos , Síndrome Premenstrual/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study examined the validity of the early-late onset subtyping distinction in dysthymic disorder. METHODS: Participants were 340 out-patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for dysthymia and a concurrent major depressive episode (MDE). The sample was drawn from a 12-site double-blind randomized parallel group trial comparing the efficacy of sertraline and imipramine in the treatment of chronic depression. All patients received comprehensive evaluations using semi-structured interviews and rating scales. RESULTS: 73% of the sample met criteria for the early-onset, and 27% for the late-onset, subtype. The early-onset patients had a significantly longer index MDE, significantly higher rates of personality disorders and lifetime substance use disorders, and a significantly greater proportion had a family history of mood disorder. The subgroups did not differ in symptom severity or functional impairment at baseline, nor in response to a 12-week trial of antidepressants. LIMITATIONS: Further work is needed to extend these findings to dysthymic disorder without superimposed MDEs. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the distinction between early-onset and late-onset dysthymic disorder.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/complicaciones , Trastorno Distímico/complicaciones , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria , Análisis de Varianza , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Trastorno Distímico/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Imipramina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Sertralina/uso terapéutico , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical and etiological significance of the early-late onset distinction in chronic major depressive disorder was explored. METHOD: Subjects were 289 outpatients with DSM-III-R chronic major depression drawn from a multi-site study comparing the efficacy of sertraline and imipramine in the acute and long-term treatment of chronic depression. Patients received comprehensive evaluations using semi-structured interviews and rating scales. RESULTS: Early-onset chronic major depression was associated with a longer index major depressive episode and higher rates of recurrent major depressive episodes, comorbid personality disorders, lifetime substance use disorders, depressive personality traits, and a history of psychiatric hospitalization. In addition, more early-onset patients tended to have a family history of mood disorders. The early-late onset distinction was not associated with differences in symptom severity, functional impairment, or treatment response. LIMITATIONS: Family members were not interviewed directly; there were a large number of statistical comparisons; and interrater reliability of the assessments was not evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Early-onset chronic major depression has a more malignant course and is associated with greater comorbidity than late-onset chronic major depression.
Asunto(s)
Edad de Inicio , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Imipramina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Demografía , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo/genética , Salud de la Familia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic depressions are common, disabling, and undertreated, and prior chronicity predicts future chronicity. However, few studies directly inform the acute or maintenance phase treatments of chronic depressions and even less is known about the effects of treatment on psychosocial functioning. METHOD: We describe the design and rationale for 2 parallel double-blind, randomized, multicenter acute and maintenance phase treatment trials. One focused on DSM-III-R major depression currently in a chronic (> or = 2 years) major depressive episode, the other on DSM-III-R major depression with concurrent DSM-III-R dysthymia ("double depression"). RESULTS: Considering the critical knowledge deficits, we designed a 12-week acute phase safety and efficacy trial of sertraline versus imipramine, followed by a 16-week continuation treatment phase for subjects with a satisfactory therapeutic response. Patients receiving sertraline who successfully completed the continuation phase entered a 76-week maintenance trial to compare sertraline with placebo; those taking imipramine continued without a placebo substitution. As part of the acute trial, subjects completing but failing to respond to the initial 12-week acute phase medication were crossed over (double-blind) to the alternative medication for a 12-week acute phase trial. We obtained naturalistic follow-up data (up to 18 months) for subjects exiting the protocol at any time. CONCLUSION: Multiphase protocols for chronic depression can test efficacy by randomized contrasts as well as shed light on key clinical issues such as the degree of response or attrition expected at particular times in a trial or the preferred medication sequence in a potential multistep treatment program.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Imipramina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Sertralina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Protocolos Clínicos , Comorbilidad , Estudios Cruzados , Trastorno Depresivo/prevención & control , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Trastorno Distímico/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Distímico/psicología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Calidad de Vida , Proyectos de Investigación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic depression appears to be a common, frequently disabling illness that is often inadequately treated. Unlike episodic depressions with shorter illness duration, neither acute nor long-term treatment approaches for chronic depression have been well studied. METHOD: 635 outpatients at 12 sites who met DSM-III-R criteria for chronic major depression or double depression were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with either sertraline (in daily doses of 50-200 mg) or imipramine (in daily doses of 50-300 mg). Efficacy and safety were assessed either weekly or every 2 weeks during the 12 weeks of acute treatment. RESULTS: Despite high rates of chronicity (mean duration of major depression = 8.9+/-9.1 years; mean duration of dysthymia = 23+/-13 years) and high rates of comorbidity, 52% of patients achieved a satisfactory therapeutic response to sertraline or imipramine (by a conservative, intent-to-treat analysis). Approximately 21% of the patients who had achieved a therapeutic response at week 12 had not done so at week 8, confirming the longer time to response in depressions with high chronicity. Patients treated with sertraline reported significantly fewer adverse events and were significantly less likely to discontinue treatment due to side effects than imipramine-treated patients (6.3% vs. 12.0%). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that patients suffering from depression with high chronicity can achieve a good therapeutic response to acute treatment with either sertraline or imipramine, although sertraline is better tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Imipramina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Sertralina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/administración & dosificación , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Trastorno Distímico/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Distímico/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Imipramina/administración & dosificación , Imipramina/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Sertralina/administración & dosificación , Sertralina/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous research has suggested that depressed patients, and particularly chronically depressed patients, have significant impairments in many areas of their lives. While previous studies suggested that these "psychosocial" impairments improve following pharmacologic treatment, no large scale definitive study using multiple measures of psychosocial functioning has been reported. METHOD: We assessed multiple domains of psychosocial functioning using interviewer-rated and self-report measures within the context of a 12-week acute treatment trial of sertraline and imipramine for patients with chronic depression (double depression and chronic major depression). We also compared the psychosocial functioning data of this sample before and after treatment with normative data available from published community samples. RESULTS: Chronically depressed patients manifested severe impairments in psychosocial functioning at baseline. After treatment with sertraline or imipramine, psychosocial functioning improved significantly. Significant improvements appeared relatively early in treatment (week 4). Despite these highly significant improvements in functioning during acute treatment, the study sample as a whole did not achieve levels of psychosocial functioning comparable to a comparator nondepressed community sample. However, patients who reached full symptomatic response (remission) during acute treatment did have levels of psychosocial functioning in most areas at endpoint that approached or equaled those of community samples. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that successful antidepressant treatment with sertraline or imipramine can alleviate the severe psychosocial impairments found in chronic depression.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Imipramina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Sertralina/uso terapéutico , Ajuste Social , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Método Doble Ciego , Trastorno Distímico/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Distímico/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción Personal , Inventario de Personalidad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The literature on predictors of response to treatment of nonchronic major depression has identified shorter duration of illness, acute onset, and less severity of illness as positive predictors. Unfortunately, there are almost no data on predictors of response to treatment for chronic depression. This study examined predictors of response to pharmacotherapy (sertraline or imipramine) in the treatment of outpatients who had DSM-III-R-defined chronic major or double depression. METHOD: The acute phase of the Chronic Major Depression and Double Depression Study is a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group 12-week comparison of sertraline and imipramine. Analyses are based on 623 patients who comprised the intent-to-treat sample, of whom 299 were nonresponders and 324 were responders, defined by a priori criteria as either remission or satisfactory therapeutic response. A stepwise logistic multiple regression analysis was performed on candidate clinical, psychosocial, and demographic variables previously identified as statistically significant in an attempt to develop a predictive model of positive antidepressant response. RESULTS: The sociodemographic variables that were predictive of positive response included living with spouse or partner or being at least a high school graduate. With regard to symptomatology and clinical history, responders had significantly lower baseline depression severity scores. In general, comorbid anxiety, substance abuse, and personality disorders did not influence rates of response. However, the presence of depressive personality traits was associated with a higher nonresponse rate. Among psychosocial variables, longer duration of personal relationships as well as higher baseline quality of life were associated with positive response. A stepwise logistic multiple regression identified 5 variables-living with spouse or partner, higher educational level, passive-aggressive personality, lower introverted-tense personality traits, and higher quality of life--that significantly and independently contributed to the predictive model. This model correctly classified 67% of patients. CONCLUSION: A higher baseline quality of life, living with spouse or partner, and having more education were the strongest predictors of response to acute pharmacotherapy among chronically depressed patients. Clinical variables and comorbidity were not identified as independent predictors, although personality traits did appear to influence treatment response. Overall, the predictive value of these baseline measures was modest, and therefore of limited clinical utility.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Imipramina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Sertralina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Método Doble Ciego , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personalidad , Probabilidad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Ajuste Social , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare the efficacy, safety, tolerability profiles, and effects on quality of life of the serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor antidepressant sertraline versus the nonselective tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline and placebo in patients with major depression. METHOD: Outpatients with DSM-III-R major depression were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment for 8 weeks with sertraline (50-200 mg daily), amitriptyline (50-150 mg daily), or matching placebo. Assessments included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale, Global Assessment Scale, Profile of Mood States, Beck Depression Inventory, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, and Health-Related Quality of Life battery. RESULTS: All treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement from baseline in depression ratings by Week 1 and thereafter. The antidepressant effects of amitriptyline and sertraline were significantly (p < .05) greater than placebo and did not differ significantly from each other. Sertraline was associated with significantly (p < .05) greater subjective (i.e., patient-rated) improvement in mood than amitriptyline or placebo. Both active drugs were associated with greater improvements than placebo on most quality of life measurements. On several items, sertraline, but not amitriptyline, was superior to placebo. There was a discernible effect of sertraline earlier than amitriptyline on most quality of life scales. Amitriptyline therapy was associated with significantly more treatment-related adverse events, and discontinuations due to treatment-related adverse events, in comparison to both sertraline and placebo therapy. CONCLUSION: Sertraline and amitriptyline each were effective treatments for major depression as assessed by both physician- and patient-rated scales. These results show that sertraline therapy is better tolerated than amitriptyline therapy. Quality of life was also improved by effective antidepressant treatment, with sertraline showing a tendency to produce greater improvements on quality of life measures.
Asunto(s)
1-Naftilamina/análogos & derivados , Amitriptilina/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , 1-Naftilamina/administración & dosificación , 1-Naftilamina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria , Amitriptilina/administración & dosificación , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/administración & dosificación , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Cooperación del Paciente , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Placebos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Sertralina , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Indirect evidence suggests that abnormalities in serotonergic function may be involved in the pathogenesis of premenstrual dysphoric disorder. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis of serotonergic deficiency in premenstrual dysphoric disorder by measuring the prolactin response to fenfluramine. METHOD: The authors administered the serotonin-releasing drug dl-fenfluramine in a placebo-controlled protocol to nine women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder and 11 healthy female volunteers in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. RESULTS: Compared to the normal subjects, the women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder had a significantly blunted prolactin response to fenfluramine. CONCLUSIONS: Premenstrual dysphoric disorder appears to be associated with serotonergic deficiency.
Asunto(s)
Fenfluramina , Síndrome Premenstrual/diagnóstico , Síndrome Premenstrual/fisiopatología , Serotonina/fisiología , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria , Femenino , Fenfluramina/farmacología , Humanos , Fase Luteínica/fisiología , Síndrome Premenstrual/sangre , Prolactina/sangre , Serotonina/sangreAsunto(s)
Industria Química/legislación & jurisprudencia , Contención de Riesgos Biológicos/normas , Regulación y Control de Instalaciones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Plaguicidas , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas , Industria Química/normas , Documentación/normas , Eficiencia Organizacional , Regulación y Control de Instalaciones/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Data for 401 depressed outpatients with mood reactivity who participated in a randomized trial comparing placebo, imipramine, and phenelzine were analyzed for predictors of differential response by stepwise multiple regression techniques. Features of the Columbia criteria for atypical depression including oversleeping, overeating, severe anergy, and pathologic rejection sensitivity were each predictive of a poorer response to imipramine than to phenelzine only when compared to those patients with none of the features. These features were not additive in their contribution to differential outcome. Lack of endogenous features was not predictive of a differential drug treatment response. Compared with patients who have no symptoms of atypical depression, patients with any of the four features had an inferior imipramine response rather than a superior phenelzine response. These analyses indicate that the clear differential responsivity to medication treatment in atypical depression is not simply related to any one defining symptom and that further correlates of this apparent biological heterogeneity need to be explored.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Imipramina/uso terapéutico , Fenelzina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Eleven men with major depression and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection underwent an open trial of imipramine. Eight of nine (89%) who completed 12 weeks responded. The mean decline in T4 cells from baseline was 100 at week 12 and 16 at week 26. No major exacerbations of HIV infection occurred.
Asunto(s)
Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Seropositividad para VIH/inmunología , Imipramina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Trastorno Depresivo/complicaciones , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Seropositividad para VIH/complicaciones , Homosexualidad , Humanos , Imipramina/farmacología , Inmunidad Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Recién Nacido , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración PsiquiátricaRESUMEN
Thirty women who met DSM-III-R criteria for late luteal phase dysphoric disorder completed a double-blind, randomly assigned crossover treatment study comparing alprazolam with placebo. Alprazolam was found to be superior to placebo. The outcome measures included physicians' global ratings as well as patients' prospective (daily) ratings and retrospective assessments. Improved study design, which addressed methodologic flaws of most previous studies of treatment outcome of "premenstrual syndrome" may account, in part, for our ability to demonstrate significant drug/placebo differences. This includes extensive screening to eliminate women who had premenstrual exacerbations of a more persistent mental illness rather than a discrete premenstrual disorder, use of prospective ratings to confirm retrospective reports of symptom patterns, placebo washout before randomization, and use of patients as their own controls.
Asunto(s)
Alprazolam/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Premenstrual/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Placebos , Síndrome Premenstrual/psicología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
The relationship of cerebral laterality to outcome of treatment with antidepressants was examined by comparing perceptual asymmetry in subgroups of depressed patients formed on the basis of clinical response to a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) or a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI). Perceptual asymmetries of 63 unmedicated depressed patients were assessed for verbal and nonverbal tasks, using dichotic listening and visual half-field methods, and retests were obtained on 49 patients after about 6 weeks of treatment. There were significant differences between TCA responders and TCA nonresponders in dichotic listening and visual field asymmetries. Differences in perceptual asymmetry were specific to TCAs, in that no comparable differences existed between MAOI responders and MAOI nonresponders. Although perceptual accuracy improved following successful TCA treatment, abnormal perceptual asymmetries in TCA responders were present before and after treatment and may thereby represent state-independent characteristics.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Percepción Auditiva/efectos de los fármacos , Trastorno Depresivo/fisiopatología , Lateralidad Funcional , Inhibidores de la Monoaminooxidasa/uso terapéutico , Campos Visuales/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Pruebas Auditivas , Humanos , Masculino , Estimulación LuminosaRESUMEN
Examined the influence of diagnostic subtype of depression on perceptual asymmetry for dichotic listening and visual tachistoscopic tasks. A total of 65 unmedicated patients with major depressive disorders and 30 normal controls were tested on a verbal and nonverbal task in each modality. Patients diagnosed according to the DSM-III with melancholia had abnormal perceptual asymmetry for dichotic nonsense syllable and complex tone tasks. In contrast, patients having a nonmelancholic "atypical depression" (reactivity of mood with preserved pleasure capacity and associated features) did not differ from normal controls on these tasks, but had an increased incidence of left handedness. Bipolar depression (history of hypomania) differed from unipolar depression in showing abnormal perceptual asymmetry for a tachistoscopic dot enumeration task. Alterations of perceptual asymmetry in melancholia and bipolar depression were consistent with hypothesized right hemisphere dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Percepción Auditiva/fisiología , Trastorno Bipolar/fisiopatología , Trastorno Depresivo/fisiopatología , Lateralidad Funcional , Percepción Visual/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Pruebas de Audición Dicótica , Femenino , Lateralidad Funcional/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
There are no reports on treatment of premenstrual syndrome with antidepressants, although depression is a common symptom of the syndrome. Eleven women who met DSM-III-R criteria for late luteal phase dysphoric disorder were treated with nortriptyline in an open pilot study after they failed to respond to placebo or another medication. Eight of 11 patients had a good therapeutic response. The efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of premenstrual depression needs confirmation with double-blind studies.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Nortriptilina/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Premenstrual/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Proyectos Piloto , Placebos , Síndrome Premenstrual/psicología , Escalas de Valoración PsiquiátricaRESUMEN
The effects of double breath inhalation of a 35% CO2 mixture in oxygen and placebo air inhalation were compared in 14 women seeking treatment for marked premenstrual dysphoric changes who did not have panic disorder and 12 control women. The first exposure to CO2 inhalation induced a panic attack reaction (severe subjective anxiety with autonomic symptoms) in 9 of 14 women with premenstrual dysphoria but none of the controls. Neither patients nor controls panicked in response to the air inhalation. Control subjects experienced mild anxiety and/or somatic symptoms after CO2 inhalation, but these did not resemble panic attacks and were clearly different from the response of the patient group.