Asunto(s)
Claudicación Intermitente , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicación Intermitente/fisiopatología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Obtaining surgical informed consent (SIC) is a critical skill most residents are expected to learn "on-the-job." This study sought to quantify the effect of 1 year of clinical experience on performance obtaining SIC in the absence of formal informed consent education. DESIGN: In this case-control cohort study, PGY1 and PGY2 surgical residents in an academic program were surveyed regarding their experiences and confidence in obtaining SIC; then assessed obtaining informed consent for a right hemicolectomy from a standardized patient. SETTING: Single academic general surgery residency program in Buffalo, NY. PARTICIPANTS: Ten PGY1 and eight PGY2 general surgery residents were included in the study, after excluding residents with additional years of training. RESULTS: PGY2 residents had significantly more experience obtaining SIC compared to PGY1 residents (median response: ">50" vs "between 6 and 15," pâ¯=â¯0.001), however there was no difference in self-reported confidence in ability obtaining SIC (mean 3.2/5 in PGY1 vs 3.4/5 in PGY2, pâ¯=â¯0.61), self-reported knowledge of SIC (mean 3.1/5 in PGY1 vs 3.6/5 in PGY2, pâ¯=â¯0.15), performance on a test regarding SIC (mean score 9.0/20, SD 3.9 for PGY1 vs mean score 9.6/20, SD 3.5, tâ¯=â¯0.387, pâ¯=â¯0.739) or performance during a standardized patient interview (mean 11.2/20, SD 2.78 for PGY1 vs mean 11.4/20, SD 1.51 for PGY2, pâ¯=â¯0.87). In the interviews all residents addressed general risks (bleeding/infection), however both groups performed worse in addressing procedure-specific risks including anastomotic leak as risk for hemicolectomy. CONCLUSIONS: A year of clinical training between PGY1 to PGY2 did not improve performance in obtaining surgical informed consent when lacking formal education, despite self-confidence in their ability. A curriculum covering the content, delivery and assessment of informed consent should be initiated for residents upon arrival to surgical training.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Cirugía General , Consentimiento Informado , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Cirugía General/educación , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Adulto , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Colectomía/educación , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare anatomic condition caused by compression of neurovascular structures as they traverse the thoracic outlet. Depending on the primary structure affected by this spatial narrowing, patients present with one of three types of TOS-venous TOS, arterial TOS, or neurogenic TOS. Compression of the subclavian vein, subclavian artery, or brachial plexus leads to a constellation of symptoms, including venous thrombosis, with associated discomfort and swelling; upper extremity ischemia; and chronic pain due to brachial plexopathy. Standard textbooks have reported a predominance of females patients in the TOS population, with females comprising 70%. However, there have been few comparative studies of sex differences in presentation, treatment, and outcomes for the various types of TOS.
Asunto(s)
Neuropatías del Plexo Braquial , Plexo Braquial , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/etiología , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/terapia , Neuropatías del Plexo Braquial/complicaciones , Vena Subclavia/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Subclavia/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have demonstrated acceptable midterm outcomes with prosthetic conduits for above-knee bypass for occlusive disease in patients with inadequate segment great saphenous vein (GSV). In this study we aimed to investigate whether this holds true for open repair of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA). METHODS: We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative data for patients who underwent open PAA repair (OPAR). We divided the cohort into three groups based on the conduit used: GSV, other autologous veins, or prosthetic graft. Study outcomes included primary patency, freedom from major amputation, amputation-free survival, and overall survival at 1 y. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression were used to compare outcomes between study groups. RESULTS: A total of 4016 patients underwent bypass for PAA from January 2010 to October 2021. The three cohorts were significantly different in many demographic and clinical characteristics. The adjusted odds of postoperative amputation among symptomatic patients were 3-fold higher for prosthetic conduits compared to the GSV (odds ratio, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.72-5.92; P < 0.001). For the 1-y outcomes, the adjusted risk of major amputation was almost 3-fold higher for patients with symptomatic disease undergoing bypass with prosthetic conduits (hazard ratio [HR], 2.97; 95% CI, 1.35-6.52; P = 0.007). When compared with GSV, prosthetic conduits were associated with 96% increased risk of death when used for repair in symptomatic patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.96; 95% CI, 1.29-2.97; P = 0.002) but no significant association with mortality in asymptomatic patients (aHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.37-1.87; P = 0.652). When compared with GSV, prosthetic conduits were associated with a 2-fold increased risk of 1-y major amputation or death when used for repair in symptomatic patients (aHR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.40-2.94; P < 0.001) but no significant association with mortality in asymptomatic patients (aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.42-1.98; P = 0.816). Comparing bypass with other veins to the GSV among patients with symptomatic disease, there was no statistically significant difference in major amputation risk (HR; 2.44; 95% CI, 0.55-10.82; P = 0.242) and no difference in the adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.26-2.44; P = 0.653). There were no differences in the adjusted risk of loss of primary patency comparing other veins to GSV (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.85-2.76; P = 0.154) and prosthetic conduits to GSV (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.57-1.26; P = 0.422). CONCLUSIONS: This large study shows that among patients undergoing OPAR, 1-y primary patency does not differ between conduit types. However, prosthetic conduits are associated with significantly higher risk of amputation and death compared to GSV among symptomatic patients. Though non-GSV autologous veins are less often used for OPAR, they have comparably acceptable outcomes as GSV.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Aneurisma de la Arteria Poplítea , Humanos , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Vena Safena/trasplante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Chronic leg ulcers are affecting approximately 6.5 million Americans, and they are associated with significant mortality, reduced quality of life, and high treatment costs. Since many chronic ulcers have underlying vascular insufficiency, accurate assessment of tissue perfusion is critical to treatment planning and monitoring. This study introduces a dual-scan photoacoustic (PA) tomography (PAT) system that can simultaneously image the dorsal and plantar sides of the foot to reduce imaging time. To account for the unique shape of the foot, the system employs height-adjustable and articulating baseball stages that can scan along the foot's contour. In vivo results from healthy volunteers demonstrate the system's ability to acquire clear images of foot vasculature, and results from patients indicate that the system can image patients with various ulcer conditions. We also investigated various PA features and examined their correlation with the foot condition. Our preliminary results indicate that vessel sharpness, occupancy, intensity, and density could all be used to assess tissue perfusion. This research demonstrated the potential of PAT for routine clinical tissue perfusion assessment.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Fotoacústicas , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Pie/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Técnicas Fotoacústicas/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Optimizing medical management and risk factor modification are underused strategies in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), despite evidence of improved outcomes. The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry is a tool to improve quality of vascular care. In this study, we used the VQI to evaluate trends in medical management in patients with CLTI undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI), and the impact of changes in management on overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS), and limb salvage (LS). METHODS: Patients undergoing index PVI for CLTI between 2012 and 2016, with ≥24 months of follow-up were identified from the national VQI registry. Patient details including smoking status and medication use, OS, LS, and AFS were analyzed with linear-by-linear association, t test, and logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 12,370 PVI completed in 11,466 patients. There was a significant increase in infrapopliteal interventions (from 29.8% to 39.0%; P < .001) and PVI performed for tissue loss (from 59.1% to 66.5%; P < .001). The percentage of current smokers at time of PVI decreased (from 36.2% to 30.7%; P = .036). At discharge, statins were initiated in 25%, aspirin in 45%, and P2Y12 therapy in 58% of patients not receiving these medications before PVI. Over the course of follow-up, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (from 41.1% to 48.0%; P < .001), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (from 46.2% to 51.3%; P < .001), and statin (from 70.4% to 77.5%; P < .001) use increased. Combined DAPT, ACE inhibitor and statin use increased from 33.6% to 39.6% (P ≤ .001). Significant improvement in 24-month OS and AFS was noted (OS, from 90.9% to 93.7% [P = .002]: AFS, from 81.2% to 83.1% [P = .046]), but not LS (from 89.6% to 89.0%; P = .83). Combined therapy with P2Y12 inhibitors, statins and ACE inhibitors was an independent predictor of improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.96; P = .034). DAPT was independent predictor of improved LS (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.87; P < .007). CONCLUSIONS: Antiplatelet, ACE inhibitor, and statin use increased over the study period and was associated with improved OS and AFS. LS trends did not change significantly over time, possibly owing to the inclusion of patients with a greater disease burden or inadequate medical management. Medical management, although improved, remained far from optimal and represents an area for continued development.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Medición de Riesgo , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Recuperación del Miembro , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated limb salvage (LS), amputation-free survival (AFS), and target extremity reintervention (TER) after plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), stenting, and atherectomy for treatment of infrapopliteal disease (IPD) with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: All index peripheral vascular interventions for IPD and CLTI were identified from the Vascular Quality Initiative registry. Of the multilevel procedures, the peripheral vascular intervention type was indexed to the infrapopliteal segment. Propensity score matching was used to control for baseline differences between groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to calculate and compare LS and AFS. RESULTS: The 3-year LS for stenting vs POBA was 87.6% vs 81.9% (P = .006) but was not significant on Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.76; P = .08). AFS was superior for stenting vs POBA (78.1% vs 69.5%; P = .001; HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90; P = .003). LS was similar for POBA and atherectomy (81.9% vs 84.8%; P = .11) and for stenting and atherectomy (87.6% vs 84.8%; P = .23). The LS rate after propensity score matching for POBA vs stenting was 83.4% vs 88.2% (P = .07; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-1.017; P = .062). The AFS rate for stenting vs POBA was 78.8% vs 69.4% (P = .005; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.89; P = .005). No significant differences were found between stenting and atherectomy (P = .21 for atherectomy; and P = .34 for POBA). The need for TER did not differ across the groups but the interval to TER was significantly longer for stenting than for POBA or atherectomy (stenting vs POBA, 12.8 months vs 7.7 months; P = .001; stenting vs atherectomy, 13.5 months vs 6.8 months; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Stenting and atherectomy had comparable LS and AFS for patients with IPD and CLTI. However, stenting conferred significant benefits for AFS compared with POBA but atherectomy did not. Furthermore, the interval to TER was nearly double for stenting compared with POBA or atherectomy. These factors should be considered when determining the treatment strategy for this challenging anatomic segment.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aterectomía/efectos adversos , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Antiplatelet therapy is recommended in patients with peripheral arterial disease to reduce cardiovascular risk and improve outcomes. However, issues including the drug of choice and use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs monotherapy remain unclear. This study aims to compare the impact of aspirin (ASA) monotherapy, P2Y12 monotherapy, and DAPT on limb salvage (LS), amputation-free survival (AFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing lower extremity peripheral endovascular intervention (PVI) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI registry was used to identify index procedures completed for CLTI between March 1, 2010 and September 30, 2017. Patients were categorized by antiplatelet use at the time of last follow-up. Patients not on antiplatelet therapy were compared with ASA, P2Y12 monotherapy, and DAPT. Propensity score-matched samples were created for direct ASA vs P2Y12 and P2Y12 vs DAPT comparisons; veracity was confirmed by χ2 and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were performed for OS, AFS, and LS. RESULTS: A total of 12,433 index PVI were completed for CLTI in 11,503 subjects in the pre-matched sample. Antiplatelet use at follow-up was: 12% none, 31% ASA, 14% P2Y12, and 43% DAPT. Median follow-up was 1389 days. P2Y12 monotherapy was associated with improved outcomes as compared with ASA monotherapy, OS (87.8% vs 85.5%l P = .026; Cox hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.98; P = .03), AFS (79.6% vs 74.8%; P < .001; Cox HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.86; P < .001) and LS (89.5% vs 86.8%; P = .013; Cox HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.91; P = .004). P2Y12 monotherapy and DAPT had comparable OS (87.8% vs 88.9%; P = .62; Cox HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77-1.14; P = .50), AFS (79.6% vs 81.5%; P = .33; Cox HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.78-1.07; P = .28), and LS (91.7% vs 89.4; P = .03; Cox HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-1.00; P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: P2Y12 monotherapy was associated with superior OS, AFS, and LS as compared with ASA monotherapy, and comparable OS, LS, and AFS with DAPT in patients undergoing PVI for CLTI. P2Y12 monotherapy may be considered over ASA monotherapy and DAPT in patients with CLTI, especially in patients with high bleeding risk.
Asunto(s)
Aspirina , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evaluate outcomes following urinary catheter (UC) versus no urinary catheter (NUC) insertion in elective endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: Retrospective record review of all elective EVAR at a university affiliated medical center over a 5-year period. Statistical analysis included Chi Sq, Independent Student t Test. RESULTS: Six surgeons performed 272 elective EVAR. Three surgeons preferred selective insertion of indwelling UC, such that 86 (32%) EVAR were completed without indwelling urinary catheters (NUC). Differences between NUC versus UC included; male: (86% vs. 70%; P = 0.004), CAD: (45% vs. 33%; p = 0.046), conscious sedation: (36% vs. 8%; P < 0.001), bilateral percutaneous EVAR (PEVAR): (100% vs. 90%; P = 0.01), within ProglideTM IFU guidelines (87% vs 75%; P = .05), major adverse operative event (MAOE): (3.5% vs. 10%; P = 0.05) and mean operative time (185 ± 73 vs. 140 ± 37; P < 0.001). Intra-operative catheterization was never required among NUC. Postoperative adverse urinary events (AUE) were more common among UC (11.4% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.41); with longer times to straight catheterization/reinsertion (1575 ± 987 vs, 522 ± 269 min; P = 0.015) and lower likelihood of eligibility for same day discharge (SDD); (41% vs. 59%; P = 0.008). Ineligibility for SDD was due to AUE in 18% of UC patients. CONCLUSION: Selective preoperative UC insertion should be considered for EVAR, with particular consideration to no preoperative catheterization in men meeting Proglide IFU. Adverse urinary events occurred less frequently among NUC and were identified/ treated earlier. Moreover, AUEs were the most common reason for potential SDD ineligibility among UC patients. Selective policies may facilitate SDD.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/etiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cateterismo Urinario , Catéteres UrinariosRESUMEN
Venous thromboembolic complications have emerged as serious sequelae in COVID-19 infections. This article summarizes the most current information regarding pathophysiology, risk factors and hematologic markers, incidence and timing of events, atypical venous thromboembolic complications, prophylaxis recommendations, and therapeutic recommendations. Data will likely to continue to rapidly evolve as more knowledge is gained regarding venous events in COVID-19 patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Tromboembolia Venosa , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Clinical preventive services can reduce mortality and morbidity, but Americans receive only half of the recommended care. Although wellness visits protect time for clinicians to review needs and discuss care with patients, studies have not shown that having a wellness visit improves health outcomes. This study seeks to understand the types of discussions and volume of care delivered during wellness visits. METHODS: Using a sample of 1,008 patients scheduled for a wellness visit from 22 primary care clinicians across 3 states from 2018 to 2019, electronic health records were reviewed, and a subset of visits was audio recorded. The discussion and delivery of clinical preventive services, as recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, were measured, and new diagnoses were identified from the clinical preventive services. Analyses were completed in 2020. RESULTS: Even though patients were up to date with 80% of the recommended clinical preventive services 3 months after the visit, only 0.5% of patients were up to date with all the recommended clinical preventive services. On average, 6.9 clinical preventive service discussions occurred during each wellness visit on the basis of electronic health records review, and 7.7 clinical preventive services discussions occurred on the basis of audio recordings. An average of 0.4 new diagnoses was identified, including cancer diagnoses, cardiovascular risks, and infections. CONCLUSIONS: Wellness visits are an important time for patients and clinicians to discuss prevention strategies and to deliver recommended clinical preventive services, leading to the identification of previously unrecognized diagnoses. This will improve patients' health. Policies and incentives that promote wellness visits are important, and efforts are needed to deliver them to those most in need.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The first annual Women's Vascular Summit highlighted sex- and gender-related knowledge gaps in vascular disease diagnosis and treatment. This finding suggests an opportunity for further research to improve care and outcomes in people who identify as women, specifically. The purpose of this study was to a large national dataset to identify all operations performed for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), carotid artery stenosis (CAS), and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the United States, and to provide data on sex-related disparities in treatment. METHODS: All hospitalizations of adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with AAA, CAS, or PAD who underwent vascular surgery from 2000 to 2016 were identified in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample. Sex-stratified U.S. Census data and sex-specific population disease prevalence estimates from the National Institute of Health and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality were used to calculate the number of U.S. adults with AAA, CAS, and PAD. Sex-stratified rates of surgery and incidence rate ratios were estimated using Poisson regression. Among those undergoing surgery, multivariable logistic regression was used to assess differences in endovascular vs open approach. RESULTS: Over 16 years, there were 1,021,684 hospitalizations for vascular surgery: 13% AAA (21% female, 79% male), 40% CAS (42% female, 58% male), and 47% PAD (42% female, 58% male). Females were older than males at time of surgery (median age, 71.3 years vs 69.7 years) and less likely to have private insurance (18% vs 23%); minimal differences were seen across race/ethnicity, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. After accounting for disease prevalence, females were still 25% less likely to undergo surgery for AAA and 30% less likely to undergo surgery for PAD compared with males with the same disease. These results were consistent over time. After adjustment, females, compared with males, were less likely to receive an endovascular procedure compared with open for AAA or CAS, and more likely to receive one for PAD. CONCLUSIONS: From 2000 to 2016 in the United States, females were less likely to undergo intervention for AAA and PAD than males. This finding is particularly significant for PAD, because the prevalence is the same for both sexes, indicating that females are likely undertreated for PAD. Additionally, females were less likely to undergo endovascular surgery for AAA and more likely to undergo endovascular surgery for PAD than males. These findings suggest that improvement in AAA and PAD identification and management in females may improve outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Pediatric abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are rarely encountered in clinical practice. The combination of a pediatric AAA in a patient with multiple peripheral artery aneurysms is even more rare. We report the management of an 11-year-old boy who presented with a ruptured AAA who also had multiple peripheral arterial aneurysms. Infectious, genetic, and inflammatory workup was negative, classifying this aneurysm as congenital.