RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To define relative increases in visual bony surface area and access to critical landmarks with the addition of a trochanteric slide osteotomy to a Kocher-Langenbeck approach. METHODS: A Kocher-Langenbeck approach followed by a trochanteric slide osteotomy was sequentially performed on 10, fresh-frozen, hemipelvectomy cadaveric specimens. Visual and palpable access to relevant surgical landmarks was recorded. Calibrated digital photographs were taken of each approach and analyzed using Image J. RESULTS: The acetabular surface area exposed was 27.66 (±6.67) cm2 for a Kocher-Langenbeck approach. This increased to and 41.82 (±7.97) cm2 with the addition of a trochanteric osteotomy. The exposed surface area was increased by 51.2% for the trochanteric osteotomy (P < 0.001). The superior margin of the acetabulum could be visualized and palpably accessed in both exposures. Access to the more anterosuperior portions of the acetabulum was consistently possible in the trochanteric osteotomy but not with the Kocher-Langenbeck approach. CONCLUSIONS: A trochanteric osteotomy may visually improve access to the most anterosuperior acetabulum but does not significantly improve surgical access to relevant portions of the superior acetabulum when compared with a Kocher-Langenbeck approach.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Debate exists over the optimal approach for addressing fractures of the proximal humerus. The purpose of this study was to objectively quantify the surface area of the humerus exposed using the deltopectoral (DP) and anterolateral acromial (ALA) approaches and to compare visualized and palpable anatomic landmarks. METHODS: Ten arms on five fresh-frozen torsos underwent the DP and ALA approaches. The arms were positioned to simulate a supine patient and held in a fixed position. Visual and/or palpable access to relevant surgical landmarks and the myotendinous junctions were recorded. The myotendinous junctions were used as a rough approximation of consistent proximal exposure of a clinically retracted tuberosity. Landmarks were grouped into quadrants based on the location. Calibrated digital photographs of each approach were analyzed to calculate the surface area and the length of the exposed bone. RESULTS: The DP and ALA approaches exposed 22.9 ± 6.3 cm2 and 16.3 ± 6.4 cm2, respectively (P = 0.03). The DP and ALA approaches provided equivalent visual and palpable access to all landmarks in the superior and inferior quadrants. The ALA allowed improved visual (80% versus 70%) and palpable (100% versus 70%) access to the myotendinous junction of the infraspinatus in the posterior quadrant. The DP approach allowed better access to anterior quadrant structures, including improved ability to visualize the myotendinous junction of the subscapularis (100% versus zero), the subscapularis insertion (100% versus 80%), and the medial anatomic neck (100% versus 20%). Palpable access to the myotendinous junction of the subscapularis (100% versus 70%) and medial anatomic neck (100% versus 60%) was also improved with the DP. CONCLUSIONS: In a cadaver model with fixed arm position, the DP provides increased exposure to the proximal humerus and more reliable access to anterior surgical landmarks, whereas the ALA allows improved access to the most posterior aspect of the shoulder.

RESUMEN

Extensile approaches to the humerus are often needed when treating complex proximal or distal fractures that have extension into the humeral shaft or in those fractures that occur around implants. The 2 most commonly used approaches for more complex fractures include the modified lateral paratricipital approach and the deltopectoral approach with distal anterior extension. Although the former is well described and quantified, the latter is often associated with variable nomenclature with technical descriptions that can be confusing. Furthermore, a method to expose the entire humerus through an anterior extensile approach has not been described. Here, we illustrate and quantify a technique for connecting anterior humeral approaches in a stepwise fashion to form an aggregate anterior approach (AAA). We also describe a method for further distal extension to expose 100% of the length of the humerus and compare this approach with both the AAA and the lateral paratricipital in terms of access to critical bony landmarks, as well as the length and area of bone exposed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A debate exists over the optimal approach for addressing fractures of the scapula and glenoid. The purpose of this study is to (1) quantify and compare osseous exposure using modified Judet (MJ) and classic Judet (CJ) approaches and (2) assess the change in scapular exposure after triceps release from the inferior glenoid. METHODS: Ten arms on 5 fresh-frozen torsos underwent MJ and CJ approaches. A triceps release was performed following the CJ approach in all specimens. Visual and/or palpable access to relevant surgical landmarks was recorded. Calibrated digital photographs were taken of each approach and analyzed using Image J (NIH, Bethesda, MD) to calculate the surface area of exposed bone. RESULTS: The MJ and CJ approaches exposed 16.8 (±7.58) cm(2) and 98.6 (±25.39) cm(2) of bone, respectively (P < 0.001). The full medial and lateral borders of the scapula were visualized in all approaches with mobilization of the teres minor. Palpable access to the full scapular spine was possible in all cadavers. Although the MJ and CJ approaches only allowed the inferior gleniod neck to be visualized in 1 and 2 specimens, respectively, performing a triceps release provided access to this structure. It also increased the CJ exposure by 12.6 cm(2) (P < 0.001) and allowed palpation of the anterior glenoid margin in 100% of specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the MJ approach allows similar access to landmarks important for reduction and fixation while exposing only 20% of the surface area typically visualized with the CJ approach.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Posterolateral tibial plateau fractures (AO/OTA 41-B or 41-C) represent a minority of proximal tibia fractures. Numerous surgical approaches have been described, each with unique variations and limitations. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively and qualitatively compare the surface area and structures exposed by four surgical approaches to the posterolateral proximal tibia. METHODS: Four published surgical approaches-direct posterolateral (DPL), transfibular (TF), posteromedial (PM), and anterolateral (AL)-were performed on 10 fresh-frozen cadavers. Once each exposure was obtained, a ruler was placed in the surgical field and calibrated digital images obtained. Overall, 10 bony and soft tissue landmarks were identified and the surgeon's ability to see or touch each landmark was recorded sequentially for each exposure. RESULTS: An average of 3.9 ± 2.7 cm(2) of posterolateral proximal tibial cortex was exposed by the DPL approach with significantly more surface area exposed by the TF, PM, and AL approaches (p < 0.01). The AL and PM approaches revealed a significantly larger area of tibial metaphysis and, when used together, consistently exposed posterior metaphyseal and intra-articular structures. CONCLUSION: A combination of the AL and PM approaches allows comparable surgical exposure to the proximal tibial when compared with two posterolateral approaches. These approaches can be employed together for reduction and fixation of injuries to the posterolateral tibial plateau and allow direct evaluation of the articular surface. Dedicated posterolateral approaches should be reserved for certain clinical situations, including proximal tibiofibular joint fracture or dislocation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Total elbow arthroplasty is a good treatment alternative for selected patients with distal humerus fractures. Its attractiveness is related to several factors, including the possibility of performing the procedure; leaving the extensor mechanism intact; faster, easier rehabilitation compared with internal fixation; and overall good outcomes reported in terms of both pain relief and function. Implant failure leading to revision surgery does happen, and patients must comply with certain limitations to extend the longevity of their implant. Development of high-performance implants may allow expanding the indications of elbow arthroplasty for fractures.

Asunto(s)