RESUMEN
ImportanceDespite widespread use of clinical diagnostic tests to assess prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2, limited evidence exists regarding how test results affect patient behaviors and decision-making. ObjectiveTo understand the rationale behind ordering diagnostic T-cell receptor (TCR) immunosequencing for assessment of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and evaluate how test results affect patient behaviors, including day-to-day activities and decisions about vaccination. DesignMandatory demographic information and clinical characteristics were collected for all individuals ordering T-Detect COVID. Study participants completed a one-time survey that included additional questions about demographics and clinical characteristics, relevant interactions with healthcare providers, reasons for ordering diagnostic TCR immunosequencing, and the utility of test results. SettingUS participants ordering T-Detect COVID between February 2021 and March 2022. ParticipantsOf the 806 individuals who underwent diagnostic TCR immunosequencing, provided informed consent, and were sent the email survey, 718 completed the survey (response rate, 89.1%). At the time of receiving the test report, 25.5% of participants had been vaccinated against COVID-19, 29.7% reported a previous COVID-19 infection, and 25.6% were immunocompromised. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were reported using descriptive statistics. Additional analyses explored trends in reported data over time and evaluated reasons for ordering diagnostic TCR immunosequencing and behaviors among participant subgroups (vaccinated or unvaccinated individuals and those with positive or negative test results). Logistic regression analysis evaluated factors that increased the likelihood of post-test vaccination. ResultsStudy participants ordered diagnostic TCR immunosequencing to understand their health status (55.0%) and to inform decision-making about daily activities (43.6%) and vaccination (38.3%). Most participants (92.1%) ordered diagnostic TCR immunosequencing for themselves without consulting their physician. Testing negative for prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with increased likelihood of subsequent COVID-19 vaccination (31.0% vs 6.9%; median time to vaccination, 17.0 days vs 47.5 days), which was confirmed by logistic regression analysis. Conclusions and RelevanceThis report presents patient-reported clinical utility of a commercial COVID-19 assay based on an immune response readout. Our findings suggest that participants used diagnostic TCR immunosequencing results to inform decisions about daily activities and COVID-19 vaccination. Trial RegistrationNot applicable. KEY POINTSO_LIWe aimed to understand the factors driving immunologic testing for SARS-CoV-2 and characterize the actions and decisions spurred by test results. C_LIO_LIResults of this study suggest that individuals frequently ordered immunologic testing for themselves to understand their health status and to inform decision-making about daily activities and vaccination. C_LIO_LIAmong unvaccinated participants, testing negative for prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with increased likelihood of undergoing vaccination and shorter time to vaccination. C_LIO_LIThis study provides the first real-world evidence of patient-perceived utility of a COVID-19 immunologic test for decision-making related to vaccination and lifestyle. C_LI
RESUMEN
The Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant contains 34 mutations in the spike gene likely impacting protective efficacy from vaccines. We evaluated the potential impact of these mutations on the cellular immune response. Combining epitope mapping to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines that we have determined from past experiments along with T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire sequencing from thousands of vaccinated or naturally infected individuals, we estimate the abrogation of the cellular immune response in Omicron. Although 20% of CD4+ T cell epitopes are potentially affected, the loss of immunity mediated by CD4+ T cells is estimated to be slightly above 30% as some of the affected epitopes are relatively more immunogenic. For CD8+ T cells, we estimate a loss of approximately 20%. These reductions in T cell immunity are substantially larger than observed in other widely distributed variants. Combined with the expected substantial loss of neutralization from antibodies, the overall protection provided by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines could be impacted adversely. From analysis of prior variants, the efficacy of vaccines against symptomatic infection has been largely maintained and is strongly correlated with the T cell response but not as strongly with the neutralizing antibody response. We expect the remaining 70% to 80% of on-target T cells induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination to reduce morbidity and mortality from infection with Omicron.
RESUMEN
Measuring the adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 can enable the assessment of past infection as well as protective immunity and the risk of reinfection. While neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers are one measure of protection, such assays are challenging to perform at a large scale and the longevity of the SARS-CoV-2 nAb response is not fully understood. Here, we apply a T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing assay that can be performed on a small volume standard blood sample to assess the adaptive T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Samples were collected from a cohort of 302 individuals recovered from COVID-19 up to 6 months after infection. Previously published findings in this cohort showed that two commercially available SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays correlate well with nAb testing. We demonstrate that the magnitude of the SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response strongly correlates with nAb titer, as well as clinical indicators of disease severity including hospitalization, fever, or difficulty breathing. While the depth and breadth of the T-cell response declines during convalescence, the T-cell signal remains well above background with high sensitivity up to at least 6 months following initial infection. Compared to serology tests detecting binding antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleoprotein, the overall sensitivity of the TCR-based assay across the entire cohort and all timepoints was approximately 5% greater for identifying prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Notably, the improved performance of T-cell testing compared to serology was most apparent in recovered individuals who were not hospitalized and were sampled beyond 150 days of their initial illness, suggesting that antibody testing may have reduced sensitivity in individuals who experienced less severe COVID-19 illness and at later timepoints. Finally, T-cell testing was able to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection in 68% (55/81) of convalescent samples having nAb titers below the lower limit of detection, as well as 37% (13/35) of samples testing negative by all three antibody assays. These results demonstrate the utility of a TCR-based assay as a scalable, reliable measure of past SARS-CoV-2 infection across a spectrum of disease severity. Additionally, the TCR repertoire may be useful as a surrogate for protective immunity with additive clinical value beyond serologic or nAb testing methods.
RESUMEN
In viral diseases T cells exert a prominent role in orchestrating the adaptive immune response and yet a comprehensive assessment of the T-cell repertoire, compared and contrasted with antibody response, after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is currently lacking. A prior population-scale study of the municipality of Vo', Italy, conducted after the initial SARS-CoV-2 outbreak uncovered a high frequency of asymptomatic infected individuals and their role in transmission in this town. Two months later, we sampled the same population's T-cell receptor repertoire structure in terms of both diversity (breadth) and frequency (depth) to SARS-CoV-2 antigens to identify associations with both humoral response and protection. For this purpose, we analyzed T-cell receptor and antibody signatures from over 2,200 individuals, including 76 PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases (25 asymptomatic, 42 symptomatic, 9 hospitalized). We found that 97.4% (74/76) of PCR confirmed cases had elevated levels of T-cell receptors specific for SARS-CoV-2 antigens. The depth and breadth of the T-cell receptor repertoire were both positively associated with neutralizing antibody titers; helper CD4+ T cells directed towards viral antigens from spike protein were a primary factor in this correlation. Higher clonal depth of the T-cell response to the virus was also significantly associated with more severe disease course. A total of 40 additional suspected infections were identified based on T-cell response from the subjects without confirmatory PCR tests, mostly among those reporting symptoms or having household exposure to a PCR-confirmed infection. Taken together, these results establish that T cells are a sensitive, reliable and persistent measure of past SARS-CoV-2 infection that are differentially activated depending on disease morbidity.
RESUMEN
T cells are involved in the early identification and clearance of viral infections and also support the development of antibodies by B cells. This central role for T cells makes them a desirable target for assessing the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here, we combined two high-throughput immune profiling methods to create a quantitative picture of the T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2. First, at the individual level, we deeply characterized 3 acutely infected and 58 recovered COVID-19 subjects by experimentally mapping their CD8 T-cell response through antigen stimulation to 545 Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class I presented viral peptides (class II data in a forthcoming study). Then, at the population level, we performed T-cell repertoire sequencing on 1,815 samples (from 1,521 COVID-19 subjects) as well as 3,500 controls to identify shared "public" T-cell receptors (TCRs) associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection from both CD8 and CD4 T cells. Collectively, our data reveal that CD8 T-cell responses are often driven by a few immunodominant, HLA-restricted epitopes. As expected, the T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 peaks about one to two weeks after infection and is detectable for at least several months after recovery. As an application of these data, we trained a classifier to diagnose SARSCoV-2 infection based solely on TCR sequencing from blood samples, and observed, at 99.8% specificity, high early sensitivity soon after diagnosis (Day 3-7 = 85.1% [95% CI = 79.9-89.7]; Day 8-14 = 94.8% [90.7-98.4]) as well as lasting sensitivity after recovery (Day 29+/convalescent = 95.4% [92.1-98.3]). These results demonstrate an approach to reliably assess the adaptive immune response both soon after viral antigenic exposure (before antibodies are typically detectable) as well as at later time points. This blood-based molecular approach to characterizing the cellular immune response has applications in clinical diagnostics as well as in vaccine development and monitoring.