RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nursing students experience patient aggression due to their age and lack of experience. Academic institutions can implement strategies to prepare students to manage aggression. METHOD: One-hundred forty-eight undergraduate nursing students in a baccalaureate nursing program participated in this quality improvement initiative. Baseline and postintervention perceived self-efficacy (PSE) data were gathered using the Self-Efficacy in Patient Centeredness Questionnaire-27. Students viewed two educational videos and underwent debriefing. RESULTS: Overall PSE scores increased significantly (p < .01) from baseline (M = 76.44, SD = 13.00) to postintervention (M = 91.66, SD = 11.97). PSE in the subscales exploring the patient's perspective, sharing information and power, and dealing with communication challenges increased significantly (p < .01) from pre- to postintervention. CONCLUSION: PSE in caring for patients exhibiting aggressive behavior increased after nursing students were taught behaviors to use and how to manage their own biases to avoid provoking patients to respond aggressively. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(7):423-426.].
Asunto(s)
Bachillerato en Enfermería , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Humanos , Autoeficacia , Comunicación , AgresiónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical nurse specialist-led initiative was to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates to less than 1 infection per 1000 catheter days, to reduce catheter device utilization, and to improve staff adherence to documentation requirements on a traumatic brain injury rehabilitation unit. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are costly hospital-acquired infections increasing length of stay and morbidity for patients. Following an education intervention, a best practice initiative was implemented. Staff performance based on electronic health record documentation, infection rates, and device utilization were compared before and after a bundle of interventions including education, staff competency, simulation, and audits. OUTCOMES: Catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates were reduced from 16.67 to 0 per 1000 catheter days and device utilization ratio from 0.122 to 0.056 per patient day. The unit maintained zero infections upon project completion. Following initiative implementation, documentation improved related to urinary catheter necessity, daily care interventions, patient education, and urine output. CONCLUSION: This initiative resulted in reductions in device utilization and catheter infection rates, which were maintained following project completion. Adherence to documentation audit criteria also improved.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Infección Hospitalaria , Enfermeras Clínicas , Infecciones Urinarias , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Humanos , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Catéteres Urinarios , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This quality improvement project created a guide for critical care providers transitioning patients to comfort measures only encouraging communication, collaboration, and shared decision making; ensuring management of patients' end-of-life symptoms and needs; and enhancing provider satisfaction by improving structure and consistency when transitioning patients. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: Interviews conducted with staff in intensive care units revealed opportunities to improve structure and processes of transitioning patients at the end of life. A subcommittee of experts designed a checklist to facilitate interdisciplinary conversations. Impact on provider satisfaction and symptom management was assessed. Presurveys circulated used a Research Electronic Data Capture tool. A checklist was implemented for 3 months, and then postsurveys were sent. Charts were audited to identify improvement in symptom management and compared with retrospective samples. OUTCOMES: Clinical improvements were seen in communication (12%), collaboration (25%), shared decision making (22%), and order entry time (17%). In addition, 72% agreed the checklist improved structure and consistency; 69% reported improved communication, collaboration, and shared decision making; 61% felt it improved knowledge/understanding of patient needs; and 69% agreed it improved management of patient symptoms. CONCLUSION: After checklist implementation, staff felt more involved and more comfortable, and reported more clarity in transitioning patients; no improvement in patient outcomes was realized.