RESUMEN
Finger revascularization has been performed without a microscope in limited-resource environments only when absolutely necessary. This experimental study sought to assess the feasibility of microvascular anastomosis in rats performed using loupes or smartphone magnification. Thirty rats were divided into three groups of 10 individuals according to the magnification method used: operating microscope (control group M), surgical loupes (group L) and smartphone (group S). The infrarenal aorta was dissected under a microscope, then anastomosed by interrupted sutures using the group-specific magnifying device. The main analytical criteria were vessel diameter, anastomosis duration, immediate flow patency (T0), patency after one hour (T1) and anastomosis quality. Anastomosis duration was comparable between groups M and L, but was twice as long in group S. The number of leaks at clamp removal was higher in group S. Patency rates at T0 and T1 were 100% in groups M and L, but were significantly lower in group S. The anastomosis quality was low in group L and poor in group S. Anastomosis of digital arteries using loupes is possible, but the resulting quality is lower than with a microscope. Current smartphones are not adequate for performslt ing microvascular repairs in a living model.