RESUMEN
Robot and computer navigation assisted joint replacement surgery have the advantages of high operational repeatability, good stability, and high accuracy. In the past decade, its application in clinical practice has become increasingly widespread. However, there may be some special adverse events during robot and computer navigation assisted joint arthroplasty surgery. If there are problems with robots, navigation equipment, or process links, it can cause robot assisted surgery to be forced to abortion and switch to manual surgery. There are reports that the incidence of abortion of robotic surgery due to such reasons is as high as 22%. There may be skin and soft tissue infections around the fixed pin of the tracker, as well as fractures through tracking pin site. Most symptoms of soft tissue infections around the pin track are mild and can be cured through local dressing changes and other treatments. Fractures through tracking pin site have a significant impact on patients, but the incidence is low, mostly reported as individual cases. As of now, a total of 29 cases have been reported in the literature, of which 17 cases (59%) occurred in the femoral shaft, 3 cases (10%) in the femoral epiphyseal end, 7 cases (24%) in the tibial shaft, and 2 cases (7%) in the tibial epiphyseal end. 10 cases (34%) were non displaced or occult fractures, which were cured through conservative treatment. The remaining 19 cases (66%) were displaced fractures, of which 4 cases (14%) were treated with open reduction and internal fixation, 14 cases (48%) were treated with intramedullary nails, and 1 case (3%) underwent total keen revision surgery. Neurovascular damage caused by fixed pin is relatively rare. Research has found that the incidence of such special complications is very low, and most of them are relatively easy to manage. But surgeons should remain vigilant and standardize surgical operations, such as installing fixed pin with care and caution, to avoid the occurrence of such special complications as much as possible.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE@#To compare the short-term effectiveness of "SkyWalker" robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and traditional TKA.@*METHODS@#A clinical data of 54 patients (54 knees) with TKA who met the selection criteria between January 2022 and March 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 27 cases underwent traditional TKA (traditional operation group) and 27 cases underwent "SkyWalker" robot-assisted TKA (robot-assisted operation group). There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in terms of gender, age, body mass index, osteoarthritis side, disease duration, and preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA). The operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, surgery-related complications, the KSS, WOMAC, and VAS scores before operation and at 6 months after operation, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at 6 months after operation were recorded. X-ray films were taken to review the prosthesis position and measure HKA, LDFA, MPTA, and PPTA. The differences of the clinical and imaging indicators between before and after operation were calculated and statistically analyzed.@*RESULTS@#The operations were completed successfully in both groups. There was no significant difference in the operative time and intraoperative bleeding volume between the two groups ( P>0.05). After operation, 1 case of incision nonunion and 1 case of heart failure occurred in the traditional operation group, while no surgery-related complications occurred in the robotic-assisted operation group. The incidences of surgical complications were 7.4% (2/27) in the traditional operation group and 0 (0/27) in the robotic-assisted operation group, with no significant difference ( P=0.491). Patients in both groups were followed up 6 months. KSS score, WOMAC score, VAS score, and ROM significantly improved in both groups at 6 months after operation when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in the differences between the pre- and post-operative values of the clinical indicators and FJS scores at 6 months after operation. X-ray films showed that the lower extremity force lines of the patients improved and the knee prostheses were in good position. Except for LDFA in the robot-assisted operation group, HKA, LDFA, MPTA, and PPTA significantly improved in both groups at 6 months after operation when compared with the preoperative ones ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the differences between the pre- and post-operative values of the radiological indicators ( P>0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#The "SkyWalker" robot-assisted TKA is one of the effective methods for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis and had good short-term effectiveness. But the long-term effectiveness needs to be further studied.