RESUMEN

A "weekend effect" resulting in higher mortality rates for patients with stroke admitted on weekends has been reported. We examine this phenomenon for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) presenting to telestroke (TS) sites to determine its effect on stroke alert process times and outcomes. From October 2015 to June 2017, we reviewed patients with AIS receiving intravenous alteplase within our TS network. We compared patients presenting to TS sites on weekdays (Monday 07:00 to Friday 18:59) to those presenting on weekends (Friday 19:00 to Monday 06:59). We analyzed door-to-alert activation, alert activation-to-TS evaluation, door-to-imaging, and door-to-needle times. Rates of favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) and death at 90 days were compared. We identified 89 (54 weekday and 35 weekend) patients (mean age: 71.8 ± 13.3 years, 47.2% women) during the study period. Median door-to-alert activation (P = .01) and door-to-needle (P = .004) times were significantly longer for patients presenting on weekends compared to weekdays. There were no significant differences in median door-to-imaging (P = .1) and alert activation-to-TS evaluation (P = .07) times. Rates of favorable outcome (P = .19) and death (P = .56) at 90 days did not differ. While there were no significant differences in outcomes, patients presenting on weekends had longer door-to-alert activation and door-to-needle times. Efforts to improve methods in efficiency of care on weekends should be considered.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) has increased the rate of detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) among cryptogenic stroke (CS) patients. We describe a single-center experience for AF detection among CS patients receiving ICMs upon discharge after the index stroke event and attempt to identify predictors for AF detection. METHODS: From April 2014 to October 2017, patients receiving ICMs for CS who underwent >60 days of monitoring were reviewed. Chronic underlying medical illnesses, presence of left atrial enlargement (LAE) on echocardiography, and PR interval on admission electrocardiogram were assessed as predictors of AF detection. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients (median age 72 [61, 78] years, 45% women) met inclusion criteria and were followed for a median of 536 [282, 848] days. Among studied patients, 68 patients (29%) were found to have AF at a median of 94.5 [16, 239] days from ICM placement. CS patients with AF were significantly older (p < 0.001), and there was a significantly higher proportion of women (p = 0.003) when compared to CS patients without AF. Neither presence of LAE nor prolonged PR interval was predictive of AF detection. CONCLUSION: Almost one-third of CS patients monitored with an ICM were found to have previously undiagnosed AF. CS patients found to have AF were older and more commonly women. Prospective studies are needed to better identify predictors for early AF among the broader population of all CS patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background Stroke patients transferred in for endovascular treatment (ET) may have lower chances for favorable outcomes compared to those who presented directly to a ET-capable hospital. We describe our real-world experience of ET in AIS, especially among patients transferred in. Materials and methods AIS patients receiving ET from January 2015 to November 2016 were reviewed. We calculated median onset to groin puncture (OTP) and groin puncture to recanalization times (PTR), location of target vessel treated, rate of concurrent intravenous (IV) alteplase use, and rate of successful recanalization as defined by TICI ≥ 2b. Outcomes included discharge disposition to nursing home (NH) and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. Results We identified 174 patients (50.6% women, mean age 69.5 ± 15.7 years, 49.4% transfer-ins) undergoing ET (20.5% terminal internal carotid artery, 47.7% M1, 17% M2, 9.2% basilar artery, 5.7% other). Median OTP and PTR times were 257 [158, 375] and 30 [22, 48] minutes, respectively. Rate of TICI ≥ 2b was 82.9%, and 55.7% received adjunctive IV alteplase. Rate of discharge to NH was 17.2% 90-day mRS ≤ 2 was 41.7%. Discharge to NH (P = 0.32) and 90-day mRS ≤ 2 (P = 0.75) were not significantly different between transferred in versus direct presentation patients. Conclusion High rates of favorable angiographic and clinical outcomes were found among AIS patients receiving ET in our single-center experience, particularly among transferred in patients. The establishment of a stroke network may help in the efficient transfer and assembly of appropriate resources for eligible patients that are transferred in for ET.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The administration of intravenous (IV) alteplase to patients with stroke via telestroke (TS) can be safe and effective. It remains unclear how quickly IV alteplase occurs during TS evaluations. We sought to compare door to needle times (DNTs) between patients receiving IV alteplase who present directly to our comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and those presenting to community hospitals in our TS network. Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who presented to emergency departments and received IV alteplase between August 2014 and June 2015 were identified at our CSC and TS network. Median DNTs with interquartile ranges were calculated in each cohort. During the study period, 117 patients with AIS (mean age 71 ± 15 years, 47% women) receiving IV alteplase were included in the analysis (65 CSC and 52 TS). Median DNT at our CSC was significantly shorter compared to TS sites (CSC: 43 [35-55] minutes vs TS: 54 [41-71] minutes, P < .01). The proportion of patients receiving IV alteplase ≤60 minutes of presentation was significantly higher at our CSC compared to our TS network (CSC 84.6% vs TS 63.5%, P = .02). Differences in favorable discharge to home were not significant (CSC 60% vs TS 46%, P = .14). Guideline-recommended DNTs ≤60 minutes can be achieved in community hospitals with TS guidance. Initiatives are required to better resemble DNTs found at stroke centers.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to stroke patients via telestroke (TS) is similar to those presenting to stroke centers. Little is known on the accuracy of TS diagnosis among those receiving IVT. We sought to compare the rate of patients receiving IVT with diagnosis of ischemic stroke as opposed to stroke mimic (SM) in our TS network to those who presented to our comprehensive stroke center (CSC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients receiving IVT between August 2014 and June 2015 were identified at our CSC and TS network. We compared rates of SM, post-IVT symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), in-hospital mortality, and discharge destination. RESULTS: We evaluated 131 receiving IVT were included in the analysis. Rates of SM receiving IVT were similar (CSC 12% versus 7% TS, p=0.33). Four stroke patients experienced sICH or in-hospital mortality; neither were found among SM patients. Discharge destination was similar between stroke and SM patients (p=0.9). SM patients had higher diagnoses of migraine (p=0.05) and psychiatric illness (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of diagnosing stroke in IVT-eligible patients evaluated via TS is similar to evaluations at our CSC. Continued efforts should be made to minimize exposure of SM patients to IVT in both settings.

Asunto(s)