RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of diagnosed dry eye syndrome, meibomian gland dysfunction, and blepharitis amongst the low vision population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients seen in the University of Colorado Low Vision Rehabilitation Service between the dates of 12/1/2017 and 12/1/2022. 74 ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients as having dry eye syndrome or not having dry eye syndrome. Data was further analyzed to determine the prevalence of blepharitis and meibomian gland dysfunction using 29 blepharitis and 9 meibomian gland dysfunction ICD-10 codes. Data were also analyzed to determine the age and sex of the patients with diagnosed dry eye syndrome. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with a diagnosis of dry eye syndrome by an eyecare provider was 38.02 %. The prevalence of dry eye syndrome by age group was 3.57 % for 0-19 years, 14.35 % for 20-39 years, 29.07 % for 40-59 years, 43.79 % for 60-79 years, and 46.21 % for 80 and above. The prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction and blepharitis was 11.90 % and 9.1 % respectively. Dry eye syndrome prevalence amongst males was 31.59 % and 42.47 % for females. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that dry eye syndrome in the low vision population is a significant co-morbidity occurring in over a third of patients in the University of Colorado Low Vision Rehabilitation Service. These findings are meaningful as ocular comfort should not be overlooked while managing complex visual needs.
Asunto(s)
Blefaritis , Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Enfermedades de los Párpados , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Baja Visión , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Baja Visión/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Glándulas Tarsales , Prevalencia , Lágrimas , Blefaritis/diagnóstico , Blefaritis/epidemiología , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Infantile nystagmus (IN) has been reported to decrease with convergence. However, previous studies reported equivocal results regarding a corresponding improvement in acuity with near viewing. The aim of this study was to determine whether visual acuity improves with near viewing in patients with IN. METHODS: In the first experiment, visual acuities were measured using clinical test charts at standard test distances of 3 or 6 m and 40 cm and using S Charts at 3.75 m and 40 cm. In the second experiment, visual acuities were measured using a Bailey-Lovie chart at distance and a Lighthouse modified ETDRS near card held by each subject at his or her preferred working distance. S-chart acuities were obtained again at 3.75 m and 40 cm for comparison. Horizontal eye movements were recorded using infrared limbal reflection for 20 of the 34 subjects in the first experiment and for all 20 subjects in the second experiment. RESULTS: The S-chart acuities measured at distance and near were almost all within 0.1 logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) in experiments 1 and 2. Clinically measured acuity averaged nearly one line better at 40 cm than at distance in experiment 1, but the mean difference between near acuity using the ETDRS card and distance acuity using the Bailey-Lovie chart was less than one letter in experiment 2. No consistent relationship existed between the changes in visual acuity with viewing distance and the subject's eye movements. CONCLUSION: Despite a reduction of nystagmus at near distances in many patients with IN, the visual acuity at near does not improve significantly. These results imply that visual acuity in patients with IN is determined primarily by sensory limitations rather than by the moment-by-moment characteristics of these patients' eye movements.