RESUMEN
Purpose: To conduct a pilot study assessing resident performance and self-efficacy during sedation-related simulations. Methods: Residents completed one informed consent and two sedation-related emergency simulations. Performance was measured for each simulation. Self- efficacy (i. e., confidence) was measured via pre- and post-simulation questionnaires. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were calculated. Results: Twenty-five residents completed the simulations. Second-year residents performed better than first-year residents in both informed consent and emergency simulations; however, only the informed consent simulation was significant (P<0.02). Self-efficacy significantly increased after completing the simulations (18 percent pre-simulation versus 42.7 percent post-simulation, P<0.001). Residents identified communication skills as an area of improvement after the simulations. For the emergency vignettes, residents expressed feeling inadequate knowledge, problem-solving skills, and teamwork during the simulation. Conclusions: Simulations improved resident confidence in obtaining informed consent and managing certain sedation-related emergencies, but residents felt ill-prepared to manage an emergency. Further study is warranted to understand the best-practice frequency of sedation-related emergency simulation to promote skill retention.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Niño , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate caries treatment decisions agreement in primary teeth among board-certified pedi- atric dentistry faculty at a single teaching institution. METHODS: Ten full-time faculty selected a treatment for each of 64 primary teeth in 17 children based on clinical photos and radiographs. Cases were presented under three different social and behavioral scenarios. Descriptive and kappa statistics were calculated. RESULTS: The interrater reliability was 0.59 for the decision at the surgical versus nonsurgical level and 0.55 for the treatment-specific decision (e. g., crown versus extraction). Surgical treatments were the predominant preference (76 percent of responses). Non- surgical treatments were preferred for early-stage lesions and in nonideal social and behavioral scenarios. Surgical options were unanimously preferred in sedation or general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Different clinical scenarios highlight different treatment preferences among faculty. Further emphasis should be placed on calibrating the decision-making process for selecting caries treatment in primary teeth among pediatric dentists.