RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Multiple Canadian jurisdictions have reported a pattern of chronic pain among people who died from substance-related acute toxicity. This study examined the prevalence and characteristics of those with chronic pain using data from a national study of people who died of accidental acute toxicity. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of accidental substance-related acute toxicity deaths that occurred in Canada between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017 was conducted. The prevalence of pain and pain-related conditions were summarized as counts and percentages of the overall sample. Subgroups of people with and without a documented history of chronic pain were compared across sociodemographic characteristics, health history, contextual factors and substances involved. RESULTS: From the overall sample (n = 7902), 1056 (13%) people had a history of chronic pain while 6366 (81%) had no documented history. Those with chronic pain tended to be older (40 years and older), unemployed, retired and/or receiving disability supports around the time of death. History of mental health conditions, trauma and surgery or injury was significantly more prevalent among people with chronic pain. Of the substances that most frequently contributed to death, opioids typically prescribed for pain (hydromorphone and oxycodone) were detected in toxicology more often among those with chronic pain than those without. CONCLUSION: Findings underscore the cross-cutting role of multiple comorbidities and unmanaged pain, which could compound the risk of acute toxicity death. Continued prioritization of harm reduction and regular patient engagement to assess ongoing needs are among the various opportunities for intervention.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Humanos , Canadá/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Prevalencia , Analgésicos Opioides/envenenamiento , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Factores de Edad , Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Factores SociodemográficosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peer assistance is an emerging area of study in injection drug use. When Canada's first supervised consumption site (SCS) opened in 2003 in Vancouver, Canada, clients were prohibited from injecting their peers; only recently has this practise been introduced as a harm reduction measure at these sites. In 2018, Health Canada granted federal exemption to allow peer-assisted injection at certain SCS sites, under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. Literature pertaining to peer-assisted injection addresses several topics: interpersonal relationships between the injection provider and recipient; the role of pragmatism; trust and expertise; and gender relations. METHODS: In this qualitative study, participants (n = 16) were recruited to be interviewed about their experiences in a peer-assisted injection program (PAIP) at one SCS regulated by Health Canada. Interview data were transcribed and thematically analyzed. Quantitative administrative data were used to provide context and to describe the study population, comprised of people in the PAIP (n = 248). RESULTS: PAIP clients made up 17.4% of all SCS clients. PAIP clients were more likely to be female and Indigenous. Injection providers expressed being moved by compassion to help others inject. While their desire to assist was pragmatic, they felt a significant burden of responsibility for the outcomes. Other prominent factors related to the injection provider-recipient relationship were social connection, trust, safety, social capital, and reciprocity. Participants also made suggestions for improving the PAIP which included adding more inhalation rooms so that if someone was unable to inject they could smoke in a safe place instead. Additionally, being required by law to divide drugs outside of the SCS, prior to preparing and using in the site, created unsafe conditions for clients. CONCLUSIONS: Regular use of the SCS, and access to its resources, enabled participants to lower their risk through smoking and to practice lower-risk injections. At the federal level, there is considerable room to advocate for allowing clients to divide drugs safely within the SCS, and to increase capacity for safer alternatives such as inhalation.