RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) pose an increased risk of gastrointestinal cancer with especially worse prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) improves outcomes in selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. Little published data describes the outcomes of CRS/HIPEC in IBD patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained CRS/HIPEC database. Outcomes in patients with and without IBD were compared for short-term outcomes such as hospital/intensive care unit stay, blood loss/transfusions, complications, and reoperations. We also examined oncological outcomes including recurrence, overall (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: We identified 232 patients that underwent CRS/HIPEC for colorectal or small bowel adenocarcinoma, of which 10 were with IBD. Patients with IBD had lower ASA (p=0.005), less hypertension (p=0.033), and 30% small bowel primary compared to none in the non-IBD cohort (p<0.001). Otherwise, demographic and perioperative characteristics were similar between the groups. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 7 and similar between the cohorts (p=0.422). Extent of organ resections and peritonectomies performed were similar. Complications occurred in 60.3% of patients (21.2% major), similar between the groups (p=0.744 and p=0.444, respectively). Reoperation rate of 27% was similar between groups (p=0.097). The median OS in the IBD cohort was 19.6 vs 53.2 months in the non-IBD cohort (p = 0.056). The median DFS in the IBD cohort was 4.9 vs 9.4 months in the non-IBD cohort (p=0.174). DISCUSSION: Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with IBD has similar complication profile and trended towards poorer oncological outcomes as CRS/HIPEC in non-IBD patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colorectal peritoneal metastases are a devastating consequence of colorectal cancer (CRC) with extremely poor prognosis. Patients that can undergo complete cytoreduction by cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) have a markedly improved overall survival. Traditionally, patients with extremely high peritoneal cancer index (PCI), PCI >20, are not offered CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of our prospectively maintained CRS/HIPEC database and evaluated all patients with CRC peritoneal metastases between 2012 and 2022. We divided the cohorts between those with low operative PCI (PCI<20) and high operative PCI (PCI =>20). We examined demographic, clinicopathologic data, perioperative, and oncological outcomes between the cohorts. RESULTS: Of the 691 patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC, 289 were evaluable with CRC metastases, 234 with PCI <20 and 43 with PCI => 20. Median radiologic preoperative and operative PCI was 4 and 10 versus 7 and 24.5 in the low and high PCI cohorts, respectively. Operative time was longer (6 vs. 4 h) and blood loss higher (500 vs. 400 mL) in the high PCI cohort. All other demographic, clinicopathological, and operative characteristics were similar. Median disease free survival (DFS) was longer in the low PCI cohort (11.5 vs. 7 months) but overall survival (OS) showed benefit (41.3 vs. 31.8 months), (p = 0.001 and p = 0.189, respectively), comparatively with an only chemotherapy strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriately selected patients with CRC metastases and extremely high PCI demonstrate similar perioperative safety outcomes in experienced tertiary referral centers. Despite a shorter median DFS, these carefully selected patients demonstrated similar median OS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear how soon after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection it is safe to resume systemic anti-neoplastic treatment in patients with cancer. We assessed the risk of admissions or postponed treatment cycle in vaccinated patients with breast cancer receiving early systemic anti-neoplastic treatment following SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted during Omicron SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Israel, January-July 2022. SARS-CoV-2 cohort included 30 vaccinated patients with breast cancer with SARS-CoV-2 infection 7-14 days prior to systemic treatment. All patients had resolved symptoms and a negative antigen detection test on the day of treatment. The pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic cohort consisted of 49 matched patients with breast cancer treated with systemic anti-neoplastic agents during 2019. RESULTS: In 30 vaccinated patients with breast cancer who received systemic anti-neoplastic treatment 7-14 days following SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared with 49 matched patients treated in 2019, the rates of emergency department (ED) visits (13% versus 6%, respectively), hospitalizations (3% versus 4%), next cycle of treatment given per protocol (90% versus 88%), and death (0% versus 0%) were similar. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of vaccinated patients with breast cancer who received systemic anti-neoplastic treatment 7-14 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection, we did not observe substantially higher rates of ED visits, hospitalizations, or deaths compared with a similar cohort of pre-COVID-19 patients with breast cancer. Most patients received the next planned cycle on time. Early resumption of systemic anti-neoplastic treatment following SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated patients with breast cancer with a negative antigen test at the day of treatment appeared to be safe. Additional data on larger cohorts and other malignancies are needed to support clinical guidelines.

RESUMEN

Current guidelines recommend that clinically staged T1N0 esophageal cancers are to be referred to surgery or endoscopic resection. Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 733 individuals with clinically staged T1N0 esophageal carcinoma, who underwent upfront surgery and did not receive any prior treatment. We assessed upstaging, which was defined as ≥ T2 disease or positive lymph nodes. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas were associated with upstaging, whereas squamous cell carcinomas were not. Specifically, the percentage of upstaging among individuals with clinically staged T1b and poorly differentiated tumor was 33.8%. Therefore, clinically staged T1bN0 poorly differentiated esophageal adenocarcinomas are at high risk for upstaging following surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer (MSS mCRC) is largely refractory to immune checkpoint inhibition. We hypothesized that a combination of intratumoral TLR9 agonist, radiosurgery and dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade would induce a local focus of immune stimulation, evoking a systemic immune response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I single-institution study, patients with MSS mCRC were treated with a priming dose of s.c vidutolimod, 3 intratumoral injections of vidutolimod and radiosurgery, combined with nivolumab and ipilimumab. Cytokine levels were measured at baseline and at 7 (± 2) weeks. Patients were accrued to 4 consecutive cohorts: (1) Safety run-in without radiosurgery, (2) Radiosurgery prior to intratumoral therapy, (3) Radiosurgery prior to intratumoral therapy with a condensed timeline, and (4) Radiosurgery to extrahepatic lesion following completion of intratumoral therapy. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were accrued. Median age was 59 years (range 40-71), 68% were male, median number of previous systemic treatments was 3 (range 2-5). None of the patients responded, aside from 1 patient, attributed to high tumor mutational burden. Grade 3 liver toxicity was reported in 0%, 0%, 75%, and 17% in cohorts 1 to 4, respectively. Systemic levels of CXCL10 and IL-10 increased, with a median of 407 versus 78 pg/mL (P = .01), and 66 versus 40 pg/mL (P = .03), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of intratumoral vidutolimod, radiosurgery, nivolumab and ipilimumab was not found to be efficacious in MSS mCRC with liver metastases. The juxtaposition of liver irradiation and intratumoral vidutolimod injection was associated with high hepatic toxicity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Constraints of pelvic anatomy render complete cytoreduction (CRS) challenging. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of pelvic peritonectomy during CRS/HIPEC on colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CRPM) patients' outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained CRS/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) database. The analysis included 217 patients with CRPM who had a CRS/HIPEC between 2014 and 2021. We compared perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients with pelvic peritonectomy (PP) (n = 63) to no pelvic peritonectomy (non-PP) (n = 154). RESULTS: No differences in demographics were identified. The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was higher in the PP group with a median PCI of 12 vs. 6 in the non-PP group (p < 0.001). Operative time was 4.9 vs. 4.3 h in the PP and non-PP groups, respectively (p = 0.63). Median hospitalization was longer in the PP group at 12 vs. 10 days (p = 0.007), and the rate of complications were higher in the PP group at 57.1% vs. 39.6% (p = 0.018). Pelvic peritonectomy was associated with worse disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with 3-year DFS and OS of 7.3 and 46.3% in the PP group vs. 28.2 and 87.8% in the non-PP group (p = 0.028, p .> 0.001). The univariate OS analysis identified higher PCI (p = 0.05), longer surgery duration (p = 0.02), and pelvic peritonectomy (p < 0.001) with worse OS. Pelvic peritonectomy remained an independent prognostic variable, irrespective of PCI, on the multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic peritonectomy at the time of CRS/HIPEC is associated with higher morbidity and worse oncological outcomes. These findings should be taken into consideration in the management of patients with pelvic involvement.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Small-bowel obstruction (SBO) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a common complication associated with re-admission that may alter patients' outcomes. Our aim was to characterize and investigate the impact of bowel obstruction on patients' prognosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with SBO after CRS/HIPEC (n = 392). We analyzed patients' demographics, operative and perioperative details, SBO re-admission data, and long-term oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 366 patients, 73 (19.9%) were re-admitted with SBO. The cause was adhesive in 42 (57.5%) and malignant (MBO) in 31 (42.5%). The median time to obstruction was 7.7 months (range, 0.5-60.9). Surgical intervention was required in 21/73 (28.7%) patients. Obstruction eventually resolved (spontaneous or by surgical intervention) in 56/73 (76.7%) patients. Univariant analysis identified intraperitoneal chemotherapy agents: mitomycin C (MMC) (HR 3.2, p = 0.003), cisplatin (HR 0.3, p = 0.03), and doxorubicin (HR 0.25, p = 0.018) to be associated with obstruction-free survival (OFS). Postoperative complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), (HR 2.2, p = 0.001) and collection (HR 2.07, p = 0.015) were associated with worse OFS. Multivariate analysis maintained MMC (HR 2.9, p = 0.006), SSI (HR 1.19, p = 0.001), and intra-abdominal collection (HR 2.19, p = 0.009) as independently associated with OFS. While disease-free survival was similar between the groups, overall survival (OS) was better in the non-obstruction group compared with the obstruction group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SBO after CRS/HIPEC is common and complex in management. Although conservative management was successful in most patients, surgery was required more frequently in patients with MBO. Patients with SBO demonstrate decreased survival.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: An increasing proportion of elderly patients (EP) are undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). They have increased comorbidities and perioperative risk. Current literature is deficient in describing the outcomes of EP undergoing CRS/HIPEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained CRS/HIPEC database analyzed perioperative and oncological outcomes of EP (>70 y) compared to younger patients (YP) (<60 y). RESULTS: Of 500 CRS/HIPEC patients, 62 EP and 210 YP were included. Median age was 73 y in EP and 46 y in YP. Demographic, clinical, operative, and perioperative outcomes were similar between groups. American Society of Anesthesiologists > 3 was more prevalent in the EP with 88.2% versus 54.8% in the YP (P < 0.001). Comorbidities were higher in the EP with 87.1% versus 39.0% in the YP (P < 0.001). Peritoneal Cancer Index score was similar with a median of 9. All postoperative and severe complications were similar with 55.2% and 17.1% in the YP and 64.5% and 21.0% in the EP (P = 0.242; P = 0.448). Postoperative mortality was similar with 1.5% in the YP and 5.0% in the EP (P = 0.134). In colorectal primary patients, median overall and disease-free survival was 61.8 and 12.9 mo in the YP and 64.6 and 11.3 mo in the EP (P = 0.363; P = 0.845). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant age difference, increased comorbidities, worse American Society of Anesthesiologists, and similar Peritoneal Cancer Index burden, we found no significant differences in perioperative complications or oncological benefit in elderly CRS/HIPEC patients. EP appear to have similar perioperative and oncological outcomes as YP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech), given as a two-dose series, 3 weeks apart, elicits a serological response in 84-98% of patients with cancer, even if administered while undergoing anticancer treatments. Herein, we report the impact of a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2, delivered 6 months following the second vaccine dose. METHODS: This pilot study included four patients with cancer who were seronegative after two vaccine doses, and received a third (booster) dose of BNT162b2 at 6 months following the second vaccine dose. The four patients received the three vaccine doses between December 2020 and July 2021. Samples were evaluated with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects IgG (Immunoglobulin G) antibodies against the RBD (receptor-binding domain) of SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: At a mean time of 19 days (ranges 7-28) after the second vaccination, all four patients were seronegative for RBD-IgG. However, at a mean time of 21 days (ranges 20-22) after the third dose, three out of the four patients (75%) were now seropositive. Mean RBD-IgG titers were increased after the third vaccine dose from 0.37 to 2.81 (Student's t-test, p = 0.05, two-sided). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by the small sample size, our findings suggest that a third (booster) dose administered to patients with cancer, who remain seronegative despite two doses of BNT162b2, may be efficacious in eliciting an antibody response.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have demonstrated benefit in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). Traditionally, extraperitoneal disease is considered a contraindication to CRS/HIPEC. Stable lung metastases in patients with colorectal cancer often have an indolent course, while the presence of untreated peritoneal metastases poorly affects short-term survival. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal disease with known stable lung metastases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained CRS/HIPEC database. In 2017, we adopted a policy of considering patients with stable lung metastases for CRS/HIPEC as part of multidisciplinary treatment. We compared the oncologic outcome and safety of CRS/HIPEC with peritoneal only (PM) against patients with peritoneal and lung metastases (PLM). RESULTS: Our database includes 570 patients with CRS/HIPEC of which 174 with CRPM that underwent CRS/HIPEC, 18 with preoperatively diagnosed peritoneal and lung metastases. The demographics of the PM and PLM group were similar with the exception of operative time that was longer in the PLM group. Median PCI of the cohort was 7, similar in both groups (p = 0.89). Three-year overall survival (OS) of PLM patients was 68%, compared to 71% in PM (p = 0.277). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 20% in PLM and 23% in PM (p = 0.688). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of stable lung metastases from colorectal cancer in patients with CRPM does not appear to affect the outcomes of CRS/HIPEC. Patients with stable lung disease should be considered for CRS/HIPEC after multidisciplinary discussion.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current NCCN guidelines exclude the possibility of using single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, while allowing doublet chemotherapy. However, single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy is a valid treatment option in other gastrointestinal malignancies, preferred for elderly and/or frail patients. The current study used a nationwide oncology database to assess the benefit of single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy, specifically in the elderly population. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2016) we identified 1953 individuals with non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent upfront D2 gastrectomy with pathologic stage ≥ T3 or Npos and free surgical margins, and had not received either preoperative chemotherapy or pre-/postoperative radiotherapy. We used IPTW analysis to compare overall survival between individuals receiving either single- or multi-agent adjuvant chemotherapy, or referred to observation alone. RESULTS: Individuals receiving single-agent chemotherapy had an overall survival benefit compared with observation alone, with an HR of 0.70 (95% CI 0.55-0.88, p < 0.001). Individuals over the age of 65 had an OS benefit with an HR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.46-0.82, p < 0.001). Comparing individuals over the age of 65 receiving single- vs. multi-agent chemotherapy, there was no overall survival difference with an HR of 0.87 (95% CI 0.64-1.18, p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine in locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma following D2 gastrectomy can improve overall survival in elderly patients. Clinicians may consider using either capecitabine or 5-FU as a treatment option in the adjuvant setting for this age group.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) has been used reliably to prognosticate patients with peritoneal metastasis, however, it fails to describe the patterns of peritoneal spread and to correlate these patterns to survival outcomes. We aim to define the scattered peritoneal spread (SPS) as a pattern associated with worse survival in colorectal peritoneal metastasis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients from a prospectively maintained database of peritoneal surface malignances (n = 280) between 2015 and 2020. SPS was defined by the presence of at least two distant and non-contiguous PCI regions. We compared patients with SPS (n = 73) and clustered peritoneal spread (CPS) (n = 88) for demographics, perioperative and survival outcomes. RESULTS: No difference in demographics or post-operative course was noted between the groups. The median follow-up was 15.4 months (0.4-70.8 months). Worse disease-free survival (DFS) in the SPS group with an estimated median of 8.2 months compared to 22.5 months in the CPS spread group, (p = 0.001). The estimated median overall survival (OS) for SPS group was 35.7 months whereas in the CPS group the median was not reached (p = 0.025). The same effect of SPS was preserved even after stratification of PCI. CONCLUSIONS: We defined and described the association of the peritoneal spread pattern to survival outcomes. SPS patients exhibit worse DFS and OS independent of the PCI level. Integration of malignant spread pattern into prognostication models along with PCI may aid in predicting oncological outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pathological response of colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CRPM) may affect prognosis. We investigated the relationship between oncological outcomes and pathological response to chemotherapy of CRPM following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained Peritoneal Surface Malignancies database between 2015 and 2020. Analysis included patients with CRPM who underwent a CRS/HIPEC procedure (n = 178). The cohort was divided into three groups according to the response ratio (ratio of tumor-positive specimens to the total number of specimens resected): Group A, complete response; Group B, high response ratio, and Group C, low response ratio. RESULTS: The group demographics were similar, but the overall complication rate was higher in Group C (65.2%) compared with Groups A (55%) and B (42.8%) [p = 0.03]. Survival correlated to response ratio; the estimated median disease-free survival of Group C was 9.1 months (5.97-12.23), 14.9 months (4.72-25.08) for Group B, and was not reached in Group A (p = 0.001). The estimated median overall survival in Group C was 35 months (26.69-43.31), and was not reached in Groups A and B (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The pathological response ratio to systemic therapy correlates with survival in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. This study supports the utilization of preoperative therapy for better patient selection, with a potential impact on survival.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) and Lynch syndrome (LS), the most common inherited cancer syndromes, are attributed to a single heterozygous pathogenic variant (PV) in BRCA1/2 or in a DNA MMR gene, respectively. Little is known about the phenotype in double heterozygotes who carry PVs in both genes. METHODS: Carriers of double-PVs in any DNA MMR gene and BRCA1/2 attending one of three tertiary oncogenetic clinics between 1/2005 and 1/2020 were identified by database search, and their relevant data were retrieved and analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven double carriers from four seemingly unrelated Ashkenazi Jewish families were evaluated. All carried an Ashkenazi Jewish founder BRCA PV, BRCA2 c.5946delT/c.6174delT (n = 10) or BRCA1 c.185delAG (n = 1). Four carried the MSH2 c.1906G > C founder PV, and 3, the MSH6 c.3984_3987dupGTCA founder PV; 3 patients had the MSH6 c.3956_3957dup PV. Eight double carriers (73%) had cancer: breast cancer (5 cases, 2 bilateral), melanoma (2 cases), urothelial cancer (2 cases), and colon, endometrial, prostate, cutaneous squamous cell cancer, glioblastoma, gastric stromal tumor, and lymphoma (1 case each). Six carriers had 1-2 tumors, one had 3 tumors, and one had 5 primary tumors. Age at diagnosis of the first tumor was 36-76 years. All carriers met NCCN BRCA1/2 testing criteria, and 3 met the revised Bethesda guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This case series, supported by the literature, suggests that the phenotype of double MSH2/6 and BRCA1/2 carriers is not associated with early disease onset or a more severe phenotype. The findings have implications for improved genetic testing guidelines and treatment strategies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) may develop sporadically or in the context of hereditary syndromes. In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), PNET is the leading cause of death. Our aim was to compare the mortality risk in sporadic and MEN1-related PNETs and identify high-risk populations. A retrospective Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis of patients with PNET was used. Patients with MEN1 were defined by syn/metachronous pituitary adenoma. Clinical data were retrieved, and all-cause mortality (ACM) risk was compared in univariate and multivariable analyses. The cohort included 569 patients (46.6% males) with sporadic (n=542) and MEN1-related (n=27) PNETs. Age at diagnosis of MEN1-related PNET was significantly younger than with sporadic PNETs (mean age 49.2±16.7 vs. 61.6±12.7 years, respectively; p < 0.001). Survival analysis showed a trend for a better outcome in patients with MEN1-related vs. sporadic PNET (Log-rank, p=0.09) and in subgroup analysis for patients with advanced disease (p=0.08). Furthermore, among patients followed expectantly, those with MEN1-related PNET had lower ACM risk than their sporadic counterparts (p=0.08). Multivariable analysis demonstrated lower ACM risk in patients diagnosed with MEN1 (hazard ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.11-1.2, p=0.09), further supporting the trend detected in the univariate analysis. In conclusion, our study demonstrates the distinct clinical profile of patients with MEN1-related PNET compared to sporadic disease and emphasizes the expertise required to accurately manage patients with PNET in this rare context. The cautious decision-making required before embarking on surgical intervention is further emphasized in this robust analysis of a large cancer database.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: The subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer (PDAC) with DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiency from BRCA1/2 variants has a favorable prognosis and is sensitive to platinum analogues and poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ripose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition with olaparib. Approximately 10% to 20% of patients with PDAC have DDR genetic alterations other than germline BRCA variants. This population has been termed as having BRCAness. An opportunity exists to define the clinical phenotype, molecular underpinnings, and effectiveness of PARP inhibitors for this population. OBJECTIVE: To examine the therapeutic effectiveness of the PARP inhibitor olaparib for patients with pancreatic cancer with BRCAness. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two parallel phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trials were conducted from November 11, 2016, to October 2, 2018, among 46 patients in Israel and Texas to determine the effectiveness of olaparib as monotherapy in advanced, previously treated PDAC with BRCAness. Inclusion criteria were treatment with 1 or more prior systemic therapies for advanced PDAC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, and lack of the germline BRCA1/2 variant. BRCAness in these studies was defined as previously known DDR genetic alterations (DDR-GAs), personal or family history of BRCA-associated cancers (without DDR-GAs), or ATM protein loss as determined by immunohistochemistry. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary study end point was the objective response rate, and the secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were enrolled, and 46 (26 women [57%]; mean [SD] age, 65.5 [11.1] years) were evaluable. The median treatment duration with olaparib was 3.0 months (interquartile range, 1.8-6.4 months). A total of 24 patients had the DDR phenotype (DDR-GAs), 17 had a family history of BRCA-associated cancers without DDR-GAs, and 5 had ATM loss as determined by immunohistochemistry. The DDR-GAs included ATM (n = 14), PALB2 (n = 2), ARID1A (n = 3), BRCA somatic (n = 1), PTEN (n = 1), RAD51 (n = 1), CCNE (n = 1), and FANCB (n = 2). Common toxic effects were grade 1 to 2 anemia, fatigue, anorexia, and nausea. One patient had a confirmed partial response (2%), 33 patients experienced stable disease (72%), of whom 11 (24%) experienced disease stability longer than 4 months and 12 patients had progressive disease (26%). The response duration for the patient with confirmed partial response was 3.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.9-5.7) and was significantly higher for patients with DDR-GAs (5.7 months; 95% CI, 3.6-8.8 months; P = .008) and platinum-sensitive PDAC (4.1 months; 95% CI, 3.6-7.8 months; P = .01). The estimated median OS was 9.9 months (95% CI, 7.6-16.1 months) in the study and 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.69 to not reached) in the prespecified DDR-GA cohort. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The definition of the BRCAness phenotype in PDAC may be limited to patients harboring DDR-GAs. In these 2 phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trials, olaparib was well tolerated and showed limited antitumor activity in patients with advanced, platinum-sensitive PDAC with DDR-GAs. These conclusions suggest a potential therapeutic opportunity for a subset of patients with PDAC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) is associated with improved survival in patients with historically dismal prognosis. Nonetheless, peritoneal recurrences remain common and represent a difficult challenge in these patients' management. Repeat CRS/HIPEC is associated with even greater morbidity and its survival benefit has not yet been clearly demonstrated. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained database and aimed to assess the safety and oncological efficacy of repeat CRS/HIPEC. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-two patients underwent an initial CRS/HIPEC, whereas 30 subsequently had repeat CRS/HIPEC for CRPM. Groups were similar in demographics, comorbidities, and peritoneal cancer index (PCI). No significant difference in morbidity, hospital stay, or reoperation rate was noted between initial and repeat procedures. Patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC had a median overall survival of 68 months versus 51 months in patients who did not undergo repeat procedure for their peritoneal recurrence (p = 0.03). Disease-free survival (DFS) in patients after repeat and after initial procedure were similar with median of 9.6 versus 12 months, respectively (p = 0.083). Univariate analysis demonstrated that PCI, DFS, and repeat procedure displayed significant factors on outcomes in patients with peritoneal recurrences, whereas PCI > 16 and DFS remained independent predictors on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis, which represents the largest series to date of repeat CRS/HIPEC for CRPM, indicates that this approach as a part of multimodal therapy is both safe and efficacious in appropriately selected patients.

Asunto(s)