RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Handgrip strength (HGS) is accepted as a predictor of overall health status and a biomarker of aging, besides negative health outcomes and mortality. While differences in HGS between the dominant and non-dominant hands are expected, substantial discrepancies may signal impaired muscle function. This study aims to investigate whether handgrip asymmetry can serve as a reliable indicator of frailty in a diverse population of older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 512 patients aged 65 years and older who were admitted to the geriatric medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital were enrolled in the study. METHODS: The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was used to assess the overall level of frailty of the study population. The highest recorded HGS values from the non-dominant and dominant hand were used to calculate the HGS ratio. Those with a HGS ratio of dominant and non-dominant hand <0.90 or >1.10 were defined as HGS asymmetry. RESULTS: Of the whole study group, 61.1% was female and the mean age was 73.2 ± 6.1 years. The ratio of the participants living with frailty was 57.6% (n = 219). The number of patients with HGS asymmetry was 264 (51.6%), and 48.4% (n = 248) of the study population had symmetric HGS. The normal and symmetric HGS was found in 40.2% of the non-frail group, whereas it was 23.7% in patients living with frailty. Furthermore, the ratio of low and asymmetric HGS was 16.3% in the non-frail group, and 35.0% in the patients living with frailty (p < 0.001). The presence of asymmetric and low HGS increased the risk of frailty three times independently of other confounding factors (OR:3.08; 95% CI:1.48-6.43; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Identifying HGS asymmetry along with low HGS as potential indicators of frailty may provide clinicians with a clear and quantifiable criterion for assessing older patients.