RESUMEN
The recent development of high average, high peak power lasers has revived the effort of using lasers as a potential tool to influence natural lightning. Although impressive, the current progress in laser lightning control technology may only be the beginning of a new area involving a positive feedback between powerful laser development and atmospheric research. In this review paper, we critically evaluate the past, present and future of Laser Lightning Control (LLC), considering both its technological and scientific significance in atmospheric research.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of verbal, tactile-verbal, and visual feedback on muscle activation of the lumbar stabilizers relative to extremity movers during an abdominal drawing-in maneuver when feedback is withheld. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study equally divided 54 healthy adults into 3 feedback groups (verbal, tactile-verbal, and visual) who trained twice per week over a 4-week period to perform supine abdominal drawing-in maneuvers. The percentage of maximum voluntary isometric contraction of rectus abdominis, multifidus (MF), erector spinae, and hamstrings (HS) as an outcome measure was acquired using surface electromyography. A 2-way factorial analysis of variance with bootstrapping allowed for comparison of post-pre difference scores across the interaction of feedback and muscle groups. RESULTS: Hamstring activation decreased in those receiving tactile-verbal feedback relative to an increase in participants given visual feedback. Furthermore, when using verbal feedback, HS activity increased relative to a decline in rectus abdominis, and when presenting visual feedback, HS activity increased relative to a decrease in MF. However, no post-pre changes were seen across muscles with tactile-verbal feedback. CONCLUSION: Although tactile-verbal feedback did not increase MF recruitment, it produced less HS activity than visual feedback. Undesirable HS recruitment may reflect boredom or feedback dependency.