RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Since direct comparisons of long-acting growth hormones (LAGHs) are lacking, analyses were performed to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of somapacitan versus somatrogon and lonapegsomatropin in children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) identified studies of once-weekly LAGHs for the treatment of pediatric GHD. Indirect comparisons (ICs) using a Bayesian hierarchical network meta-analysis and a random effects model were performed using daily growth hormone (GH) 0.034 mg/kg/day (base case) or 0.024-0.034 mg/kg/day (alternative analyses) as the common comparator to compare height outcomes to 52 weeks [annualized height velocity, height velocity standard deviation score (SDS), and height SDS]. Identified evidence did not allow IC of safety or longer-term efficacy outcomes so these were qualitatively described. RESULTS: The SLR identified two somapacitan trials, three somatrogon trials (one included in alternative analyses only), and one lonapegsomatropin trial comparing the LAGH with daily GH in treatment-naïve pre-pubertal children for IC. ICs revealed no differences at 52 weeks between somapacitan versus somatrogon and lonapegsomatropin, as well as daily GH, with respect to all growth outcomes considered in children with GHD. All three LAGHs had sustained efficacy and were generally well tolerated, with comparable efficacy and safety to daily GH, with the exception of observed injection site pain for somatrogon. CONCLUSION: No efficacy and safety differences were identified in comparisons of once weekly somapacitan versus somatrogon and lonapegsomatropin, as well as daily GH. All treatments were generally well tolerated, with the exception of observed injection site pain for somatrogon.
It is valuable to compare similarly acting treatments to determine their relative benefits and risks. Direct comparisons of long-acting growth hormones (LAGHs) are lacking, so analyses were performed to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of the LAGH somapacitan versus the LAGHs somatrogon and lonapegsomatropin in children with growth hormone deficiency. Studies of once-weekly LAGHs for the treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency were identified using a systematic literature review, then the data obtained were indirectly compared using standard statistical methods with daily growth hormone 0.034 mg/kg/day (base case) or 0.0240.034 mg/kg/day (alternative analyses) as the common comparator. Height outcomes to 52 weeks (annualized height velocity, height velocity standard deviation score, and height standard deviation score) were compared between treatments. Sufficient information to allow indirect comparison of safety or longer-term efficacy outcomes were not found so these were qualitatively described. The systematic literature review identified two somapacitan trials, three somatrogon trials (one included in alternative analyses only) and one lonapegsomatropin trial comparing the LAGH with daily growth hormone in previously untreated pre-pubertal children for inclusion in the indirect comparison. Indirect comparisons identified no differences to 52 weeks between somapacitan versus somatrogon and lonapegsomatropin, as well as daily growth hormone, with respect to all growth outcomes considered in children with growth hormone deficiency. All three LAGHs had sustained efficacy and were generally well tolerated, with comparable efficacy and safety to daily growth hormone, with the possible exception of injection site pain with somatrogon.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, is evaluated in short children born small for gestational age (SGA). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate efficacy, safety, tolerability as well as total and bioactive insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) response of once-weekly somapacitan compared to daily GH in children born SGA. METHODS: REAL5 is a randomized, multi-center, open-label, controlled phase 2 study comprising a 26-week main phase, 26-week extension, and an ongoing 4-year safety extension (NCT03878446). SETTING: Thirty-eight sites across 12 countries. PATIENTS: Sixty-two GH-treatment-naïve, prepubertal short children born SGA were randomized; 61 completed 52-weeks of treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Patients randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to somapacitan (0.16, 0.20 or 0.24 mg/kg/week) or daily GH (0.035 or 0.067 mg/kg/day), all administered subcutaneously. RESULTS: Estimated mean height velocity (HV; cm/year) at week 52 was 8.5, 10.4 and 10.7 cm/year for somapacitan 0.16, 0.20 and 0.24 mg/kg/week, respectively, and 9.3 and 11.2 cm/year for daily GH 0.035 and 0.067 mg/kg/day, respectively. Dose-dependent increases in total IGF-I as well as peak IGF-I bioactivity were observed for both treatments and were similar between comparator groups. For somapacitan, exposure-response modelling indicated highest efficacy with 0.24 mg/kg/week after 52 weeks of treatment. Similar safety and tolerability were demonstrated across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: A sustained dose-dependent growth response was demonstrated for somapacitan after 52 weeks of treatment. Overall, somapacitan 0.24 mg/kg/week provides similar efficacy, safety, and tolerability, as well as comparable bioactive and total IGF-I response, as daily GH (0.067 mg/kg/day) in children born SGA.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: The pretreatment blood transcriptome predicts growth response to daily growth hormone (GH) therapy with high accuracy. OBJECTIVE: Investigate response prediction using pretreatment transcriptome in children with GH deficiency (GHD) treated with once-weekly somapacitan, a novel long-acting GH. METHODS: REAL4 is a randomized, multinational, open-label, active-controlled parallel group phase 3 trial, comprising a 52-week main phase and an ongoing 3-year safety extension (NCT03811535). A total of 128/200 treatment-naïve prepubertal children with GHD consented to baseline blood transcriptome profiling. They were randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous somapacitan (0.16â mg/kg/week) or daily GH (0.034â mg/kg/day). Differential RNA-seq analysis and machine learning were used to predict therapy response. RESULTS: 121/128 samples passed quality control. Children treated with somapacitan (n = 76) or daily GH (n = 45) were categorized based on fastest and slowest growing quartiles at week 52. Prediction of height velocity (HV; cm/year) was excellent for both treatments (out of bag [OOB] area under curve [AUC]: 0.98-0.99; validation AUC: 0.83-0.84), as was prediction of secondary markers of growth response: HV standard deviation score (SDS) (0.99-1.0; 0.75-0.78), change from baseline height SDS (ΔHSDS) (0.98-1.0; 0.61-0.75), and change from baseline insulin-like growth factor-I SDS (ΔIGF-I SDS) (0.96-1.0; 0.85-0.88). Genes previously identified as predictive of GH therapy response were consistently better at predicting the fastest growers in both treatments in this study (OOB AUC: 0.93-0.97) than the slowest (0.67-0.85). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment transcriptome predicts first-year growth response in somapacitan-treated children with GHD. A common set of genes can predict the treatment response to both once-weekly somapacitan and conventional daily GH. This approach could potentially be developed into a clinically applicable pretreatment test to improve clinical management.
RESUMEN
Context: Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy improves longitudinal growth and adult height in children with GH deficiency (GHD). GH stimulates insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I release, the biomarker used for monitoring GH activity during treatment. Objective: This study aims to provide model-based insights into the dose-IGF-I responses of once-weekly somapacitan, a novel long-acting GH, compared with daily GH in children with GHD. Methods: Analyses included dosing information and 1473 pharmacokinetic samples from 210 somapacitan-treated pediatric patients with GHD across 3 trials, including phase 1 (NCT01973244), phase 2 (NCT02616562; REAL 3), and phase 3 (NCT03811535; REAL 4), as well as 1381 IGF-I samples from 186 patients with GHD treated with somapacitan in REAL 3 and REAL 4. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling to characterize somapacitan dose-IGF-I response and predict the response to dosing day changes. Results: Relationships were established between somapacitan dose, exposure, change from baseline IGF-I SD score (SDS), and height velocity (HV). A linear model permitted the development of a tool to calculate estimated average weekly IGF-I exposure from a single IGF-I sample obtained at any time within the somapacitan dosing interval at steady state. In practice, the use of this tool requires knowledge of somapacitan injection timing relative to IGF-I sample collection timing. IGF-I SDS simulations support flexible dosing day changes while maintaining at least 4 days between doses. Conclusion: We characterized the dose-IGF-I response of somapacitan in children with GHD. To support physicians in IGF-I monitoring, we present a practical guide about expected weekly average IGF-I concentrations in these patients and provide insights on dosing day flexibility.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Investigate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 3 once-weekly somapacitan doses compared with daily growth hormone (GH) administration in short children born small for gestational age (SGA). DESIGN: Randomised, multi-centre, open-label, controlled phase 2 study comprising a 26-week main phase and a 4-year extension (NCT03878446). The study was conducted at 38 sites across 12 countries. 26-week main phase results are presented here.Sixty-two GH treatment-naïve, prepubertal short children born SGA were randomised and exposed; 61 completed the main phase. Three somapacitan doses (0.16 [n = 12], 0.20 [n = 13], 0.24 [n = 12] mg/kg/week) and 2 daily GH doses (0.035 [n = 12], 0.067 [n = 13] mg/kg/day) were administered subcutaneously. RESULTS: After 26 weeks of treatment, the estimated mean annualised height velocity (HV) was 8.9, 11.0, and 11.3â cm/year for somapacitan 0.16, 0.20, and 0.24â mg/kg/week, respectively, compared to 10.3 and 11.9â cm/year for daily GH 0.035 and 0.067â mg/kg/day. Changes from baseline in HV standard deviation score (SDS), height SDS, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) SDS showed similar dose-dependent responses. Exposure-response modelling indicated the greatest efficacy correlated with the highest somapacitan exposure. Similar safety and tolerability were demonstrated for all weekly somapacitan and daily GH doses. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the totality of data on improvements in height-based parameters combined with exposure-response analyses, somapacitan 0.24â mg/kg/week appears most efficacious, providing similar efficacy, safety, and tolerability as daily GH 0.067â mg/kg/day in short children born SGA after 26 weeks of treatment.