RESUMEN
The periplasmic ligand-binding protein ChoX is part of the ABC transport system ChoVWX that imports choline as a nutrient into the soil bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti. We have recently reported the crystal structures of ChoX in complex with its ligands choline and acetylcholine and the structure of a fully closed but substrate-free state of ChoX. This latter structure revealed an architecture of the ligand-binding site that is superimposable to the closed, ligand-bound form of ChoX. We report here the crystal structure of ChoX in an unusual, ligand-free conformation that represents a semi-closed form of ChoX. The analysis revealed a subdomain movement in the N-lobe of ChoX. Comparison with the two well-characterized substrate binding proteins, MBP and HisJ, suggests the presence of a similar subdomain in these proteins.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/química , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Colina/metabolismo , Proteínas de Unión Periplasmáticas/química , Proteínas de Unión Periplasmáticas/metabolismo , Sinorhizobium meliloti , Cristalografía por Rayos X , Ligandos , Simulación de Dinámica Molecular , Movimiento , Pliegue de Proteína , Estructura Terciaria de ProteínaRESUMEN
The ATP-binding cassette transporter ChoVWX is one of several choline import systems operating in Sinorhizobium meliloti. Here fluorescence-based ligand binding assays were used to quantitate substrate binding by the periplasmic ligand-binding protein ChoX. These data confirmed that ChoX recognizes choline and acetylcholine with high and medium affinity, respectively. We also report the crystal structures of ChoX in complex with either choline or acetylcholine. These structural investigations revealed an architecture of the ChoX binding pocket and mode of substrate binding similar to that reported previously for several compatible solute-binding proteins. Additionally the ChoX-acetylcholine complex permitted a detailed structural comparison with the carbamylcholine-binding site of the acetylcholine-binding protein from the mollusc Lymnaea stagnalis. In addition to the two liganded structures of ChoX, we were also able to solve the crystal structure of ChoX in a closed, substrate-free conformation that revealed an architecture of the ligand-binding site that is superimposable to the closed, ligand-bound form of ChoX. This structure is only the second of its kind and raises the important question of how ATP-binding cassette transporters are capable of distinguishing liganded and unliganded-closed states of the binding protein.
Asunto(s)
Acetilcolina/química , Proteínas Bacterianas/química , Proteínas Portadoras/química , Colina/química , Sinorhizobium meliloti/metabolismo , Adenosina Trifosfato/química , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Carbono/química , Proteínas Portadoras/metabolismo , Cristalografía por Rayos X , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Cinética , Ligandos , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Unión Proteica , Homología de Secuencia de Aminoácido , Especificidad por SustratoRESUMEN
In the soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis, five transport systems work in concert to mediate the import of various compatible solutes that counteract the deleterious effects of increases in the osmolarity of the environment. Among these five systems, the ABC transporter OpuA, which catalyzes the import of glycine betaine and proline betaine, has been studied in detail in the past. Here, we demonstrate that OpuA is capable of importing the sulfobetaine dimethylsulfonioacetate (DMSA). Since OpuA is a classic ABC importer that relies on a substrate-binding protein priming the transporter with specificity and selectivity, we analyzed the OpuA-binding protein OpuAC by structural and mutational means with respect to DMSA binding. The determined crystal structure of OpuAC in complex with DMSA at a 2.8-A resolution and a detailed mutational analysis of these residues revealed a hierarchy within the amino acids participating in substrate binding. This finding is different from those for other binding proteins that recognize compatible solutes. Furthermore, important principles that enable OpuAC to specifically bind various compatible solutes were uncovered.
Asunto(s)
Bacillus subtilis/química , Proteínas Bacterianas/química , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Lipoproteínas/química , Lipoproteínas/metabolismo , Compuestos de Sulfonio/metabolismo , Sustitución de Aminoácidos/genética , Bacillus subtilis/genética , Bacillus subtilis/crecimiento & desarrollo , Bacillus subtilis/metabolismo , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Sitios de Unión , Cristalización , Cristalografía por Rayos X , Lipoproteínas/genética , Modelos Moleculares , Estructura Molecular , Mutagénesis Sitio-Dirigida , Unión Proteica , Especificidad por SustratoRESUMEN
In microorganisms, members of the binding-protein-dependent ATP-binding cassette transporter superfamily constitute an important class of transport systems. Some of them are involved in osmoprotection under hyperosmotic stress by facilitating the uptake of "compatible solutes". Currently, the molecular mechanisms used by these transport systems to recognize compatible solutes are limited to transporters specific for glycine betaine and proline betaine. Therefore, this study reports a detailed analysis of the molecular principles governing substrate recognition in the Ehu system from Sinorhizobium meliloti, which is responsible for the uptake of the compatible solutes ectoine and hydroxyectoine. To contribute to a broader understanding of the molecular interactions underlying substrate specificity, our study focused on the substrate-binding protein EhuB because this protein binds the ligand selectively, delivers it to the translocation machinery in the membrane and is thought to be responsible for substrate specificity. The crystal structures of EhuB, in complex with ectoine and hydroxyectoine, were determined at a resolution of 1.9 A and 2.3 A, respectively, and allowed us to assign the structural principles of substrate recognition and binding. Based on these results, site-directed mutagenesis of amino acids involved in ligand binding was employed to address their individual contribution to complex stability. A comparison with the crystal structures of other binding proteins specific for compatible solutes revealed common principles of substrate recognition, but also important differences that might be an adaptation to the nature of the ligand and to the demands on protein affinity imposed by the environment.