RESUMEN
Revascularization surgery for the symptomatic hemisphere with hemodynamic impairment is effective for Moyamoya vasculopathy patients. However, careful patient selection is crucial and ideally supported by advanced quantitative hemodynamic imaging. Recently, blood oxygenation level-dependent cerebrovascular reactivity (BOLD-CVR) and quantitative magnetic resonance angiography with non-invasive optimal vessel analysis (qMRA-NOVA) have gained prominence in assessing these patients. This study aims to present the results of BOLD-CVR and qMRA-NOVA imaging along with the changes in cerebral hemodynamics and flow status following flow augmentation with superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass in our Moyamoya vasculopathy patient cohort. Symptomatic patients with Moyamoya vasculopathy treated at the Clinical Neuroscience Center of the University Hospital Zurich who underwent hemodynamic and flow imaging (BOLD-CVR and qMRA-NOVA) before and after bypass were included in the analysis. Reduced hemispheric volume flow rates, as well as impaired BOLD-CVR, were measured in all 12 patients with Moyamoya vasculopathy before STA-MCA bypass surgery. Following the surgical procedure, post-operative BOLD-CVR demonstrated a non-significant increase in BOLD-CVR values within the revascularized, symptomatic middle cerebral artery territory and cerebral hemisphere. The results of the statistical tests should be viewed as indicative due to the small sample size. Additionally, post-operative qMRA-NOVA revealed a significant improvement in the hemispheric volume flow rate of the affected hemisphere due to the additional bypass flow rate. Our findings affirm the presence of hemodynamic and flow impairments in the symptomatic hemisphere of the Moyamoya vasculopathy patients. Bypass surgery proves effective in improving both BOLD-CVR impairment and the hemispheric volume flow rate in our patient cohort.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: A superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass is classically considered a low-flow bypass. It is known that the flow in the flow augmentation STA-MCA bypass is influenced by flow demand of the revascularized territory and can reach significantly higher values. The authors report their intraoperative flow measurement data in a consecutive series of 100 STA-MCA bypasses performed at their institution. Moreover, in a subanalysis, they show the postoperative bypass flow measured with quantitative MR angiography (qMRA) noninvasive optimal vessel analysis (NOVA). METHODS: Between January 2013 and October 2023, 100 patients with acute, subacute, or chronic large-vessel occlusion (LVO) or moyamoya disease underwent a flow augmentation STA-MCA bypass revascularization at the authors' department with intraoperative bypass flow measurement. Patients with atherosclerotic LVO who underwent bypass surgery within a 6-week period following the onset of ischemic stroke symptoms were categorized into the acute bypass group, encompassing both acute and subacute LVO cases. Conversely, those who underwent bypass surgery > 6 weeks after the last occurrence of ischemic stroke were classified as the chronic group. Since May 2019, a consecutive subgroup of 37 patients received a postoperative (before discharge) bypass flow measurement with the qMRA-NOVA imaging tool. RESULTS: The mean ± SD intraoperative bypass flow in this consecutive series of 100 STA-MCA bypasses was 53.5 ± 28.8 ml/min (range 14-145 ml/min). In the subanalysis, there was no difference in the intraoperative flow capacity between the acute and chronic groups and between the moyamoya and acute groups. Patients in the moyamoya group showed a significantly higher flow rate in the STA-MCA bypass compared with the chronic group (63.0 ± 30.2 ml/min vs 48.4 ± 26.5 ml/min, p = 0.03). In a consecutive subanalysis of 37 STA-MCA bypass cases, postoperative flow measurements were also performed using qMRA-NOVA, showing a significant increase in the flow of STA-MCA bypasses after surgery compared with intraoperative flow measurements (mean intraoperative bypass flow rate vs qMRA-NOVA postoperative bypass flow rate: 73.4 ± 29.9 ml/min vs 111.3 ± 51.4 ml/min, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Using intraoperative and postoperative quantitative flow measurements of the STA, the data confirm that the flow in the flow augmentation STA-MCA bypass is influenced by the flow demand of the revascularized territory and can reach high values if needed. Moreover, the significant flow increase in the postoperative flow measurement using qMRA-NOVA demonstrates that the bypass can increase its flow over time.
RESUMEN
Background: A major clinical challenge is the adequate identification of patients with acute (<1 week) and subacute (1-6 weeks) ischemic stroke due to internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion who could benefit from a surgical revascularization after a failure of endovascular and/or medical treatment. Recently, two novel quantitative imaging modalities have been introduced: (I) quantitative magnetic resonance angiography (qMRA) with non-invasive optimal vessel analysis (NOVA) for quantification of blood flow in major cerebral arteries (in mL/min), and (II) blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). The aim of this study is to present our cohort of patients who underwent surgical revascularization in the acute and subacute phase of ischemic stroke as well as to demonstrate the importance of hemodynamic and flow assessment for the decision-making regarding surgical revascularization in patients with acute and subacute stroke and ICA-occlusion. Methods: Symptomatic patients with acute and subacute ischemic stroke because of persistent ICA-occlusion despite optimal medical/endovascular recanalization therapy who were treated at the Neuroscience Clinical Center of the University Hospital Zurich underwent both BOLD-CVR and qMRA-NOVA to study the hemodynamic and collateral vessel status. Patients selected for surgical revascularization according to our previously published flowchart were included in this prospective cohort study. Repeated NOVA and BOLD-CVR investigations were done after bypass surgery as follow up as well as clinical follow up. Continuous BOLD-CVR and qMRA-NOVA variables were compared using paired Student t-test. Results: Between May 2019 and September 2022, superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass surgery was performed in 12 patients with acute and subacute stroke because of ICA-occlusion despite of optimal endovascular and/or medical treatment prior to the surgery. Impaired BOLD-CVR in the occluded vascular territory [MCA territory: ipsilateral vs. contralateral: -0.03±0.07 vs. 0.11±0.07 %BOLD/mmHgCO2, P<0.001] as well as reduced hemispheric flow with qMRA-NOVA (ipsilateral vs. contralateral: 228.00±54.62 vs. 384.50±70.99 mL/min, P=0.01) were measured indicating insufficient collateralization. Post-operative qMRA-NOVA showed improved hemispheric flow (via bypass) (pre-bypass vs. post-bypass: 236.60±76.45 vs. 334.20±131.33 mL/min, P=0.02) and the 3-month-follow-up with BOLD-CVR showed improved cerebral hemodynamics (MCA territory: pre-bypass vs. post-bypass: -0.01±0.05 vs. 0.06±0.03 %BOLD/mmHgCO2, P=0.02) in all patients studied. Conclusions: Quantitative assessment with BOLD-CVR and qMRA-NOVA allows us to evaluate the pre- and post-operative cerebral hemodynamics and collateral vessel status in patients with acute/subacute stroke due to ICA occlusion who may benefit from surgical revascularization after failure of endovascular/medical treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Perfused placentas provide an excellent and accessible model for microvascular dissection, microsuturing and microanastomosis training - particularly in the early microsurgical learning curve. This way, a significant amount of live animals can be spared. METHOD: We present the Zurich Microsurgery Lab protocol, detailing steps for obtaining, selecting, cleaning, flushing, cannulating, and preserving human placentas - as well as microsurgical training examples - in a tried-and-true, safe, cost-effective, and high-yield fashion. CONCLUSION: Our technique enables highly realistic microsurgical training (microdissection, microvascular repair, microanastomosis) based on readily available materials. Proper handling, preparation, and preservation of the perfused placenta models is key.
Asunto(s)
Microcirugia , Placenta , Embarazo , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Microcirugia/métodos , Placenta/cirugía , Placenta/irrigación sanguínea , Microdisección , Disección , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Several microsurgical techniques are available for the decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). More recently, a spinous process-splitting laminectomy (SPSL) technique was introduced, with the premise of diminishing paraspinal muscle damage. This study aims to compare the neurologic and functional outcomes, as well as the differences in early postoperative pain and analgesic use during hospitalization after conventional decompression (CD) versus SPSL surgery for LSS. METHODS: Single-center retrospective analysis of all spinal decompression procedures (CD or SPSL) that were performed or supervised by one consulting spine surgeon, performed for LSS between 2015 and 2020. Preoperative neurologic symptoms, functional outcomes, as well as perioperative analgesic use and reported pain scales during hospitalization were analyzed. RESULTS: From a total of 106 patients, 58 were treated using CD and 48 using SPSL. In both groups, around one-third of the patients were taking opiates preoperatively (38% for CD, 31% for SPSL). Patients submitted to SPSL reported more pain on first postoperative day but significantly less pain in the further postoperative course (day 3 numeric rating scale [NRS] 2.4 vs. 3.4, P = 0.03 and on day 5 NRS 2.5 vs. 3.7, P = 0.009). Equal or less cumulative doses of analgesics were administered postoperatively (significantly less paracetamol on day 5 compared with CD; P = 0.013). Both groups showed a similarly favorable outcome in terms of improved mobility and there were no significant differences between complications and re-stenosis rates between both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with SPSL technique for LSS showed an equivalent favorable functional outcome compared to CD. However, SPSL patients showed significantly less subacute postoperative pain while using equal amounts or fewer analgesics postoperatively.