RESUMEN
AIMS: To determine the reliability of transpalpebral ultrasound in B-mode (B-TUS) with a high-resolution linear probe (18 MHz) in estimating both the ocular anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL), as well as its agreement with the IOL Master 500 optical biometer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study on 82 eyes of 41 volunteers with no history of eye disease. ACD and AL were determined using B-TUS and the IOL Master 500. The agreement between the two tech-niques and the variability of B-TUS (inter- and intra-observer) were analyzed with the Bland-Altman method. To this end, the mean difference between measures±1.96 SD was calculated to determine the limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS: The mean difference±1.96SD between B-TUS and the IOL Master 500 was -0.41±0.25mm for ACD (p<0.001) and -0.48±0.45 mm for AL (p<0.001). The maximum variability for B-TUS (average±1.96SD) was 0.00±0.35 mm at the inter-observer level for AL, and 0.00±0.18mm at the intra-observer level for AL. CONCLUSION: The determination of ACD and AL by B-TUS has a good re-liability and variability, in line with other sonographic techniques. However, it systematically provides smaller measurements than those obtained with the IOL Master 500, similar to the conventional ultrasound techniques. B-TUS could be useful in the assessment and follow-up of a wide range of ophthalmic diseases, in which a high accuracy in ACD and AL is not determinant.
Asunto(s)
Cámara Anterior , Biometría , Cámara Anterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and agreement between Fully Refocused Steady-State magnetic resonance sequences (FRSS) and the IOLMaster® 500 optical biometer for measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL). METHODS: In a sample of 32 healthy volunteers, separate observers measured the ACD and AL of both eyes using both techniques (inter-method) and through repeated FRSS measurements (interobserver) and by the same observer (intraobserver). We employed the Bland-Altman method to determine the agreement between FRSS and partial coherence interferometry (using the IOLMaster®) and the interobserver and intraobserver variability, providing the limits of agreement (LoA, or mean difference ± 1.96 SD). Correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients were also provided. RESULTS: For ACD measurements with FRSS in pseudo-color scale, we obtained an LoA of 0.016 ± 0.266 mm compared with partial coherence interferometry. For AL with FRSS in greyscale, the LoA was 0.019 ± 0.383 mm. Maximum interobserver variability showed a - 0.036 ± 0.247 mm LoA for ACD with FRSS in pseudo-color scale. Maximum intraobserver variability was 0.000 ± 0.157 mm LoA for AL with FRSS in greyscale. CONCLUSIONS: ACD and AL measurements using FRSS sequencing present high LoA and reliability when compared with partial coherence interferometry using the IOLMaster® 500. The results were better for FRSS in pseudo-color scale in ACD determination and for FRSS in greyscale in AL determination. FRSS would not be recommended for IOL power calculation due to variability of AL measurement.