Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oncotarget ; 7(8): 8839-49, 2016 Feb 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26814433

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Extracellular vesicles released by prostate cancer present in seminal fluid, urine, and blood may represent a non-invasive means to identify and prioritize patients with intermediate risk and high risk of prostate cancer. We hypothesize that enumeration of circulating prostate microparticles (PMPs), a type of extracellular vesicle (EV), can identify patients with Gleason Score≥4+4 prostate cancer (PCa) in a manner independent of PSA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasmas from healthy volunteers, benign prostatic hyperplasia patients, and PCa patients with various Gleason score patterns were analyzed for PMPs. We used nanoscale flow cytometry to enumerate PMPs which were defined as submicron events (100-1000nm) immunoreactive to anti-PSMA mAb when compared to isotype control labeled samples. Levels of PMPs (counts/µL of plasma) were also compared to CellSearch CTC Subclasses in various PCa metastatic disease subtypes (treatment naïve, castration resistant prostate cancer) and in serially collected plasma sets from patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: PMP levels in plasma as enumerated by nanoscale flow cytometry are effective in distinguishing PCa patients with Gleason Score≥8 disease, a high-risk prognostic factor, from patients with Gleason Score≤7 PCa, which carries an intermediate risk of PCa recurrence. PMP levels were independent of PSA and significantly decreased after surgical resection of the prostate, demonstrating its prognostic potential for clinical follow-up. CTC subclasses did not decrease after prostatectomy and were not effective in distinguishing localized PCa patients from metastatic PCa patients. CONCLUSIONS: PMP enumeration was able to identify patients with Gleason Score ≥8 PCa but not patients with Gleason Score 4+3 PCa, but offers greater confidence than CTC counts in identifying patients with metastatic prostate cancer. CTC Subclass analysis was also not effective for post-prostatectomy follow up and for distinguishing metastatic PCa and localized PCa patients. Nanoscale flow cytometry of PMPs presents an emerging biomarker platform for various stages of prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Micropartículas Derivadas de Células/patología , Vesículas Extracelulares/patología , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Nanotecnología , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Biopsia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Micropartículas Derivadas de Células/metabolismo , Vesículas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Microscopía de Fuerza Atómica , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Próstata/metabolismo , Próstata/cirugía , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Prostatectomía , Hiperplasia Prostática/sangre , Hiperplasia Prostática/patología , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/cirugía , Complejo de la Endopetidasa Proteasomal/inmunología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Células Tumorales Cultivadas , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA