RESUMEN
The deposition, residence time, and dissolution profile of nasal suspensions containing corticosteroids play a key role in their in vivo efficacy after administration. However, the conventional methods available to characterize nasal products appear to be unsuitable to exhaustively cover these aspects. The work aims to investigate technological aspects of Ryaltris (mometasone furoate and olopatadine hydrochloride nasal spray) compared to other commercial anti-allergic nasal products, namely, Dymista (azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate), Nasonex (mometasone furoate), and Avamys (fluticasone furoate). Innovative characterization methods were combined with more traditional approaches to investigate the anti-allergic nasal sprays. These methods applied together allowed to differentiate between the different products and provided a clear picture of the nasal product behavior in terms of drug dissolution and deposition. In particular, the dissolution tests were performed exploiting the Respicell® apparatus, an innovative technique that allows for the investigation of inhalation products. Then, formulation viscosities were considered along with a formulation flow test on an inclined plane. Finally, the intranasal deposition profile of the commercial formulations was determined using a silicon nasal cast. The results highlight in vitro significant differences in terms of viscosity as well as dissolution rate of the nasal products, with Ryaltris showing a higher viscosity and lower flow compared to other products, which, along with a corticosteroid faster dissolution rate than Dymista, suggest a potential advantage in terms of clinical behavior.
RESUMEN
The upper airways represent the point of entrance from where Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection spreads to the lungs. In the present work, α-tocopheryl-polyethylene-glycol succinate (TPGS) micelles loaded with cyclosporine A (CSA) were developed for nasal administration to prevent or treat the viral infection in the very first phases. The behavior of the micelles in presence of simulated nasal mucus was investigated in terms of stability and mucopenetration rate, evidencing long-term stability and fast diffusion across the glycoproteins matrix. Moreover, the spray characteristics of the micellar formulation and deposition profile in a silicon nasal model were studied using three nasal spray devices. Results allowed to identify the nasal spray pump (BiVax, Aptar) able to provide the wider and uniform deposition of the nasal cavity. The cyclosporine A micelles antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 was tested on the Omicron BA.1 variant using Vero E6 cells with protocols simulating treatment before, during and after the infection of the upper airways. Complete viral inactivation was observed for the cyclosporine-loaded micelles while a very low activity was evidenced for the non-formulated drug, suggesting a synergistic activity of the drug and the formulation. In conclusion, this work showed that the developed cyclosporine A-loaded micellar formulations have the potential to be clinically effective against a wide spectrum of coronavirus variants.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Ciclosporina , Humanos , Ciclosporina/farmacología , Micelas , SARS-CoV-2 , Rociadores Nasales , Portadores de Fármacos , Polietilenglicoles , Antivirales/farmacologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The upper respiratory tract is a major route of infection for COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases. Thus, it appears logical to exploit the nose as administration site to prevent, fight, or minimize infectious spread and treat the disease. Numerous nasal products addressing these aspects have been considered and developed for COVID-19. AREAS COVERED: This review gives a comprehensive overview of the different approaches involving nasal delivery, i.e., nasal vaccination, barrier products, and antiviral pharmacological treatments that have led to products on the market or under clinical evaluation, highlighting the peculiarities of the nose as application and absorption site and pointing at key aspects of nasal drug delivery. EXPERT OPINION: From the analysis of nasal delivery strategies to prevent or fight COVID-19, it emerges that, especially for nasal immunization, formulations appear the same as originally designed for parenteral administration, leading to suboptimal results. On the other hand, mechanical barrier and antiviral products, designed to halt or treat the infection at early stage, have been proven effective but were rarely brought to the clinics. If supported by robust and targeted product development strategies, intranasal immunization and drug delivery can represent valid and sometimes superior alternatives to more conventional parenteral and oral medications.