RESUMEN

Background and Objective: Lung cancer stands as the main cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. With the advent of immunotherapy and the discovery of targetable oncogenic driver genes, although prognosis has changed in the last few years, survival rates remain dismal for most patients. This emphasizes the urgent need for new strategies that could enhance treatment in precision medicine. The role of the microbiota in carcinogenesis constitutes an evolving landscape of which little is known. It has been suggested these microorganisms may influence in responses, resistance, and adverse effects to cancer treatments, particularly to immune checkpoint blockers. However, evidence on the impact of microbiota composition in oncogene-addicted tumors is lacking. This review aims to provide an overview of the relationship between microbiota, daily habits, the immune system, and oncogene-addicted tumors, focusing on lung cancer. Methods: A PubMed and Google Scholar search from 2013 to 2024 was conducted. Relevant articles were reviewed in order to guide our research and generate hypothesis of clinical applicability. Key Content and Findings: Microbiota is recognized to participate in immune reprogramming, fostering inflammatory, immunosuppressive, or anti-tumor responses. Therefore, identifying the microbiota that impact response to treatment and modulating its composition by interventions such as dietary modifications, probiotics or antibiotics, could potentially yield better outcomes for cancer patients. Additionally, targeted therapies that modulate molecular signaling pathways may impact both immunity and microbiota. Understanding this intricate interplay could unveil new therapeutic strategies. Conclusions: By comprehending how microbiota may influence efficacy of targeted therapies, even though current evidence is scarce, we may generate interesting hypotheses that could improve clinical practice.

RESUMEN

Gut microbiome (GM) and its either pro-tumorigenic or anti-tumorigenic role is intriguing and constitutes an evolving landscape in translational oncology. It has been suggested that these microorganisms may be involved in carcinogenesis, cancer treatment response and resistance, as well as predisposition to adverse effects. In melanoma patients, one of the most immunogenic cancers, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and MAPK-targeted therapy-BRAF/MEK inhibitors-have revolutionized prognosis, and the study of the microbiome as a modulating factor is thus appealing. Although BRAF/MEK inhibitors constitute one of the main backbones of treatment in melanoma, little is known about their impact on GM and how this might correlate with immune re-induction. On the contrary, ICI and their relationship to GM has become an interesting field of research due to the already-known impact of immunotherapy in modulating the immune system. Immune reprogramming in the tumor microenvironment has been established as one of the main targets of microbiome, since it can induce immunosuppressive phenotypes, promote inflammatory responses or conduct anti-tumor responses. As a result, ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the role of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT), as well as the impact of using dietary supplements, antibiotics and probiotics in the prediction of response to therapy. In this review, we provide an overview of GM's link to cancer, its relationship with the immune system and how this may impact response to treatments in melanoma patients. We also discuss insights about novel therapeutic approaches including FMT, changes in diet and use of probiotics, prebiotics and symbiotics. Finally, we hypothesize on the possible pathways through which GM may impact anti-tumor efficacy in melanoma patients treated with targeted therapy, an appealing subject of which little is known.

Asunto(s)

Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Melanoma , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinasas de Proteína Quinasa Activadas por Mitógenos , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Microambiente Tumoral

RESUMEN

Metastatic melanoma (MM) is a pathological entity with a very poor prognosis that, until a few decades ago, had a low response rate to systemic treatments. Fortunately, in the last few years, new therapies for metastatic melanoma have emerged. Currently, targeted therapy and immunotherapy are the mainstays of the therapeutic arsenal available for patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. However, both clinical evolution and drug efficacy in melanoma patients are very different depending on the stage at which it is diagnosed. In fact, the aggressiveness of melanoma is different depending on whether it debuts directly as metastatic disease or if what occurs is a relapse after a first diagnosis at an early stage, although the biological determinants are largely unknown. Another key aspect in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma at first diagnosis strives in the different prognosis of melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) compared to melanoma of known primary (MPK). Understanding the mechanisms behind this, and the repercussion of implementing targeted and immune therapies in this specific form is crucial for designing diagnosis and treatment decision algorithms that optimize the current strategies. In this review article, we recapitulate the information available thus far regarding the epidemiology and response to immunotherapy treatments or targeted therapy in patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma as a first diagnosis, with especial emphasis on the emerging specific information of the subpopulation formed by MUP patients.