Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
2.
Int J Med Educ ; 10: 180-190, 2019 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31562805

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study surveys medical education literature published over the last 25 years (1993-2018) to identify the factors scholars consider deleterious to outpatient teaching for medical students. METHODS: This study conducts a review of medical education literature published between 1993 and 2018 using Medline, Lilacs, Ibecs, Cochrane Library, and Scielo databases. The following search terms were utilized: "Education, Medical, Undergraduate" AND "Ambulatory Care" AND "Teaching/methods" OR "Clinical Clerkship" OR "Preceptorship." This study focuses on papers describing deleterious factors for outpatient teaching with medical students and analyzes their results, discussions, and conclusions sections. RESULTS: Of the 363 articles obtained, this study selected 33 for analysis. These papers identify numerous factors as barriers to outpatient education. For didactic purposes, these factors are categorized into four barrier groups: environment-institution, academic staff, students, and patients. Academic staff-related teaching barrier was the most frequently mentioned obstacle. Intense care schedule with little teaching time was considered the most common and relevant barrier to outpatient medical education, followed by inappropriate teaching environment and inadequate supervision model. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of recent literature on studies focusing on barriers to effective outpatient medical education. Factors identified as harmful to outpatient education have been pointed out by course directors, academic staff, and students in the literature. However, many of these factors remain overlooked by educators, who can use these factors to modify their academic activities for more effective results.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Educación Médica/métodos , Estudiantes de Medicina , Educación Médica/normas , Educación Médica/tendencias , Humanos , Enseñanza/normas , Enseñanza/tendencias
3.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 17(6): 647-653, Nov.-Dec. 2013. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-696964

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To collect data about non-controlled prescribing use of daptomycin and its impact among Brazilian patients with serious Gram positive bacterial infection, as well as the efficacy and safety outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a multi-center, retrospective, non-interventional registry (August 01, 2009 to June 30, 2011) to collect data on 120 patients (44 patients in the first year and 76 patients in the second year) who had received at least one dose of commercial daptomycin in Brazil for the treatment of serious Gram-positive bacterial infection. RESULTS: Right-sided endocarditis (15.8%), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI)wound (15.0%) and bacteremia-catheter-related (14.2%) were the most frequent primary infections; lung (21.7%) was the most common site for infection. Daptomycin was used empirically in 76 (63.3%) patients, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common suspected pathogen (86.1%). 82.5% of the cultures were obtained prior to or shortly after initiation of daptomycin therapy. Staphylococcus spp. - coagulase negative, MRSA, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus were the most frequently identified pathogens (23.8%, 23.8% and 12.5%, respectively). The most common daptomycin dose administered for bacteremia and cSSTI was 6 mg/kg (30.6%) and 4 mg/kg (51.7%), respectively. The median duration of inpatient daptomycin therapy was 14 days. Most patients (57.1%) did not receive daptomycin while in intensive care unit. Carbapenem (22.5%) was the most commonly used antibiotic concomitantly. The patients showed clinical improvement after two days (median) following the start of daptomycin therapy. The clinical success rate was 80.8% and the overall rate of treatment failure was 10.8%. The main reasons for daptomycin discontinuation were successful end of therapy (75.8%), switched therapy (11.7%), and treatment failure (4.2%). Daptomycin demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile regardless of treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin had a relevant role in the treatment of Gram-positive infections in the clinical practice setting in Brazil.


Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Brasil , Daptomicina/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 17(6): 647-53, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23916455

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To collect data about non-controlled prescribing use of daptomycin and its impact among Brazilian patients with serious Gram positive bacterial infection, as well as the efficacy and safety outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a multi-center, retrospective, non-interventional registry (August 01, 2009 to June 30, 2011) to collect data on 120 patients (44 patients in the first year and 76 patients in the second year) who had received at least one dose of commercial daptomycin in Brazil for the treatment of serious Gram-positive bacterial infection. RESULTS: Right-sided endocarditis (15.8%), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI)-wound (15.0%) and bacteremia-catheter-related (14.2%) were the most frequent primary infections; lung (21.7%) was the most common site for infection. Daptomycin was used empirically in 76 (63.3%) patients, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common suspected pathogen (86.1%). 82.5% of the cultures were obtained prior to or shortly after initiation of daptomycin therapy. Staphylococcus spp. - coagulase negative, MRSA, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus were the most frequently identified pathogens (23.8%, 23.8% and 12.5%, respectively). The most common daptomycin dose administered for bacteremia and cSSTI was 6mg/kg (30.6%) and 4mg/kg (51.7%), respectively. The median duration of inpatient daptomycin therapy was 14 days. Most patients (57.1%) did not receive daptomycin while in intensive care unit. Carbapenem (22.5%) was the most commonly used antibiotic concomitantly. The patients showed clinical improvement after two days (median) following the start of daptomycin therapy. The clinical success rate was 80.8% and the overall rate of treatment failure was 10.8%. The main reasons for daptomycin discontinuation were successful end of therapy (75.8%), switched therapy (11.7%), and treatment failure (4.2%). Daptomycin demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile regardless of treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin had a relevant role in the treatment of Gram-positive infections in the clinical practice setting in Brazil.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Brasil , Daptomicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
Acta paul. enferm ; 26(2): 185-191, 2013. tab
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS, BDENF - Enfermería | ID: lil-675595

RESUMEN

OBJETIVO: Identificar os fatores preditores de infecção ou colonização por micro-organismos resistentes. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado estudo quantitativo de coorte prospectivo. Foram realizadas a análise descritiva, para conhecimento da população do estudo, e a análise discriminante, para identificação dos fatores preditores. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 85 pacientes com infecções por micro-organismos resistentes: Pseudomonas aeruginosas resistente aos carbapenêmicos (24,7%), Acinetobacter resistente aos carbapenêmicos (21,2%), Staphylococcus aureus resistente à meticilina (25,9%), Enterococcus spp. resistente à vancomicina (17,6%) e Klebsiella pneumoniae resistente aos carbapenêmicos (10,6%). A análise discriminante identificou transferências de outros hospitais e internação na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva como fatores preditores para ocorrência de infecção pelos grupos S. aureus resistente à meticilina, Acinetobacter resistente aos carbapenêmicos e K. pneumoniae resistente aos carbapenêmicos. Nenhuma das variáveis estudadas foi discriminante para Enterococcus spp. resistente à vancomicina e P. aeruginosas resistente aos carbapenêmico. CONCLUSÃO: Os fatores preditores encontrados foram: internação na UTI e a transferências de outros hospitais.


OBJECTIVE: Identifying predictors of infection or colonization with resistant microorganisms. METHODS: A quantitative study of prospective cohort was carried out. A descriptive analysis was performed in order to know the population of the study and a discriminant analysis was performed to identify the predictors. RESULTS: In this study were included 85 patients with infections caused by resistant microorganisms: carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosas (24.7%); carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter (21.2%); methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (25.9%), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp (17.6%) and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (10.6%). The discriminant analysis identified transfers from other hospitals and hospitalization in intensive care unit as predictors for the occurrence of infections by the following groups: S. aureus resistant to methicillin, Acinetobacter resistant to carbapenems and K. pneumoniae resistant to carbapenems. None of the studied variables was discriminant for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosas.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Transferencia de Pacientes , Estudios de Cohortes , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 15(1): 45-51, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21412589

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the infection control measures actually implemented by dental surgeons during dental practice, as patients and professionals are exposed to high biological risk in dental care environments. METHOD: 614 questionnaires (90.69%) were answered by professionals registered in updating or in post-graduate courses in the Municipality of São Paulo. RESULTS: Out of surveyed professionals 30.62% admitted that surface protection barriers were not used, whereas 34.17% were using non ideal or outdated pre-disinfection practices. The autoclave was used by 69.38% of participants, although 33.80% were not monitoring control of the sterilization cycles. Chemical and biological indicators were not used simultaneously by 83.21% of respondents and were not employed on a daily or weekly basis by at least 81.75%. Dubious methods of sterilization were cited by 44.77%. Occupational accidents caused by cutting and piercing objects were reported by 47.88%; however, the biologic risk was underestimated by 74.15% of the professionals who suffered the accidents. Irritant solutions were used as an antiseptic agent by 18.55%. CONCLUSIONS: Infection control measures reported by dental surgeons during their practices are deficient. It is necessary to educate, raise awareness of professionals, and promote constant updating courses on procedures which aim at improving safety of dental care.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Control de Infección Dental/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología/normas , Esterilización/métodos , Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Desinfección/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infección Dental/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
7.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 15(1): 45-51, Jan.-Feb. 2011. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-576785

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the infection control measures actually implemented by dental surgeons during dental practice, as patients and professionals are exposed to high biological risk in dental care environments. METHOD: 614 questionnaires (90.69 percent) were answered by professionals registered in updating or in post-graduate courses in the Municipality of São Paulo. RESULTS: Out of surveyed professionals 30.62 percent admitted that surface protection barriers were not used, whereas 34.17 percent were using non ideal or outdated pre-disinfection practices. The autoclave was used by 69.38 percent of participants, although 33.80 percent were not monitoring control of the sterilization cycles. Chemical and biological indicators were not used simultaneously by 83.21 percent of respondents and were not employed on a daily or weekly basis by at least 81.75 percent. Dubious methods of sterilization were cited by 44.77 percent. Occupational accidents caused by cutting and piercing objects were reported by 47.88 percent; however, the biologic risk was underestimated by 74.15 percent of the professionals who suffered the accidents. Irritant solutions were used as an antiseptic agent by 18.55 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Infection control measures reported by dental surgeons during their practices are deficient. It is necessary to educate, raise awareness of professionals, and promote constant updating courses on procedures which aim at improving safety of dental care.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología/normas , Control de Infección Dental/métodos , Esterilización/métodos , Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología/estadística & datos numéricos , Desinfección/métodos , Control de Infección Dental/instrumentación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 11(1): 53-6, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17625728

RESUMEN

This study evaluates vancomycin prescribing patterns in a tertiary-care hospital, with high prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, comparing with the guidelines proposed by the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. The study was conducted in a 930-bed tertiary-care hospital, during 40 days (March 10 to April 30, 2003). Data were collected of all patients given vancomycin, using a standardized chart-extraction form designed. Inappropriate use was subdivided in five categories: empiric therapy without risk factors; continued empiric use for presumed infections in patients whose cultures were negative for beta-lactam-resistant Gram-positive microorganisms; treatment of infections caused by beta-lactam-sensitive Gram-positive microorganisms, without allergy history to beta-lactam antimicrobials; treatment in response to a single blood culture positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus, if other blood cultures taken during the same time frame were negative; systemic or local prophylaxis for infection or colonization of indwelling central or peripheral intravascular catheters. Of 132 orders, 126 (95.4%) were considered to have been appropriate. Of these 126 prescriptions, 31 (24.6%) were administered for treatment of proven Gram-positive infections (78.1% of those were MRSA), 1 (0.8%) for beta-lactam allergy and 95 (75.4%) for empiric treatment of suspected Gram-positive infections. The majority of the patients (88.6%) have used antimicrobial recently (3 months). The mean pre-treatment hospitalization period was 14 +/- 15 days. Of the 132 treatments, 105 (79.5%) were nosocomial infections. In the institution analyzed, the vancomycin use was considered conscientious. Reduction in use of glycopeptide may be obtained by adaptations the CDC criteria, or by improvement of diagnostic criteria.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico
13.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 11(1): 53-56, Feb. 2007. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-454683

RESUMEN

This study evaluates vancomycin prescribing patterns in a tertiary-care hospital, with high prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, comparing with the guidelines proposed by the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. The study was conducted in a 930-bed tertiary-care hospital, during 40 days (March 10 to April 30, 2003). Data were collected of all patients given vancomycin, using a standardized chart-extraction form designed. Inappropriate use was subdivided in five categories: empiric therapy without risk factors; continued empiric use for presumed infections in patients whose cultures were negative for beta-lactam-resistant Gram-positive microorganisms; treatment of infections caused by beta-lactam-sensitive Gram-positive microorganisms, without allergy history to beta-lactam antimicrobials; treatment in response to a single blood culture positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus, if other blood cultures taken during the same time frame were negative; systemic or local prophylaxis for infection or colonization of indwelling central or peripheral intravascular catheters. Of 132 orders, 126 (95.4 percent) were considered to have been appropriate. Of these 126 prescriptions, 31 (24.6 percent) were administered for treatment of proven Gram-positive infections (78.1 percent of those were MRSA), 1 (0.8 percent) for beta-lactam allergy and 95 (75.4 percent) for empiric treatment of suspected Gram-positive infections. The majority of the patients (88.6 percent) have used antimicrobial recently (3 months). The mean pre-treatment hospitalization period was 14±15 days. Of the 132 treatments, 105 (79.5 percent) were nosocomial infections. In the institution analyzed, the vancomycin use was considered conscientious. Reduction in use of glycopeptide may be obtained by adaptations the CDC criteria, or by improvement of diagnostic criteria.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico
14.
In. Assis, Denise Brandão de; Ferreira, Sílvia Alice; Malinverni, Cláudia. Prevenção e controle de infecções associadas a procedimentos estéticos. São Paulo, SES/SP, 2007. p.12-15.
Monografía en Portugués | LILACS, Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-CTDPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-ACVSES, SESSP-CVEPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1074592
15.
Am J Infect Control ; 34(4): 201-7, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16679177

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Some problems have been reported with the power of the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) risk index to predict the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) for specific procedures. OBJECTIVES: To develop an alternative risk prediction index for SSI and to compare the performance with the NNIS index. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out with all (609) patients submitted to digestive tract surgery in 2 general teaching hospitals in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, from August 2001 through March 2002. RESULTS: The final incidence rate of SSI was 24.5%; 149 cases of SSI were identified: 33 (22.1%) during hospitalization and 116 (77.9%) after discharge. Logistic multivariate analysis was used for construction of the model. Obesity, surgery risk, adjusted duration, and video laparoscopic surgery were statistically significant (P < .05) for all previous procedures. The performance of the NNIS model in this study showed a low predictive capacity for the occurrence of SSI as determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (0.627; 95% CI: 0.575-0.678) compared with the alternative model developed with this population (0.732; 95% CI: 0.685-0.779). CONCLUSION: The presence of obesity, adjusted duration, and surgery risk significantly increased the risk for SSI. The NNIS risk index was not significant for SSI in the sample studied, and laparoscopic access was associated with a significant reduction in the risk for SSI. Although the NNIS index is a well-known and simple index, other models depicting variables related to SSI with a better sensitivity and specificity can be developed. Additional studies are required to confirm our results.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Tracto Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Obesidad/complicaciones , Medición de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Brasil/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Factores de Riesgo
16.
Rev. méd. Minas Gerais ; 16(1): 18-23, jan.-mar. 2006. tab
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-563756

RESUMEN

A infecção da ferida cirúrgica (IFC) tem sido apontada como um dos mais importantes tipo de infecção. Objetivos: este estudo buscou desenvolver um índice preditor de risco para IFC em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia digestória, comparar sua capacidade preditora com o índice de risco do National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS); determinar a incidência da IFC intra-hospitalar e pós-alta. Métodos: tratou-se de um estudo prospectivo, realizado em dois hospitais gerais de São Paulo, no período de agosto de 2001 a março de 2002. Resultados: 609 pacientes foram submetidos a cirurgia e acompanhados durante a internação e após alta. Foram notificadas 149 IFC, obteve-se uma incidência global de 24,5% IFC, sendo 33 (22,1%) durante a internação e 116 (77,9%) após alta. Por análise multivariada construiu-se o modelo alternativo como as seguintes variáveis ( p na regressão logística <0,20): obesidade, risco cirurgia, duração ajustada, cirurgia laparoscópica e potencial de contaminação. Na validação do índice de risco, NNIS, verificou-se que o mesmo mostrou-se pouco preditor à ocorrência da IFC, na amostra estudada, curva ROC [(0,652); 0,627; IC95% 0,575 - 0,678]; modelo alternativo [(0,895); 0,753; IC95% 0,708 - 0,799]. Conclusão: a presença de obesidade, o potencial de contaminação a duração da cirurgia ajustada e o risco cirurgia incrementam significativamente o risco da IFC. Acredita-se que tais resultados possam contribuir para subsidiar uma análise crítica e reflexiva em relação ao sistema de vigilância epidemiológica adotada pelos profissionais do controle de infecção, aprimorando a vigilância atualmente realizada para o paciente cirúrgico , atentando para parâmetros que até o momento não utilizados.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo
17.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 9(4): 283-7, 2005 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16270119

RESUMEN

Though the basic principles of antibiotic prophylaxis have been well established, there is still considerable incorrect usage, including how much is prescribed and especially in the duration of treatment, which is generally superior to what is indicated. The adequate use of these drugs contributes towards decreasing the time of internment of the patient, prevents surgical site infection (SSI), decreasing the development of resistant microorganisms, and towards reduced costs for the hospital pharmacy. A protocol for the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in the Orthopedics and Traumatology Service of the Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo was developed. The objectives of the study were to promote rational antibiotic surgical prophylaxis, through the implantation of a protocol for the use of these drugs in a surgical unit, with the direct contribution of a druggist in collaboration with the Infection Control Committee, to evaluate the adhesion of the health team to the protocol during three distinct periods (daily pre-protocol, early post-protocol and late post-protocol) and to define the consumption of antimicrobials used, measured as daily defined dose.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Protocolos Clínicos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Profilaxis Antibiótica/economía , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Hospitales Generales , Hospitales Públicos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
18.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 9(4): 283-287, Aug. 2005. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-415681

RESUMEN

Though the basic principles of antibiotic prophylaxis have been well established, there is still considerable incorrect usage, including how much is prescribed and especially in the duration of treatment, which is generally superior to what is indicated. The adequate use of these drugs contributes towards decreasing the time of internment of the patient, prevents surgical site infection (SSI), decreasing the development of resistant microorganisms, and towards reduced costs for the hospital pharmacy. A protocol for the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in the Orthopedics and Traumatology Service of the Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo was developed. The objectives of the study were to promote rational antibiotic surgical prophylaxis, through the implantation of a protocol for the use of these drugs in a surgical unit, with the direct contribution of a druggist in collaboration with the Infection Control Committee, to evaluate the adhesion of the health team to the protocol during three distinct periods (daily pre-protocol, early post-protocol and late post-protocol) and to define the consumption of antimicrobials used, measured as daily defined dose.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Profilaxis Antibiótica/economía , Protocolos Clínicos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Hospitales Generales , Hospitales Públicos
19.
Rev. panam. infectol ; 7(1): 16-27, ene.-mar. 2005. tab, graf
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: lil-404950

RESUMEN

A linezolida é um antibiótico eficaz no tratamento de infecções de pele e de parte moles (IPPM) causadas por S. aureus resistente a meticilina (MRSA); além disso, seu uso pode antecipar a alta, reduzir os custos, minimizar as complicações decorrentes da internação e do uso da via intravenosa. Este estudo compara os tratamentos com linezolida e vancomicina para IPPM-MRSA


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Piel , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Oxazolidinonas , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus , Vancomicina , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio
20.
In. Cimerman, Sérgio; Cimerman, Benjamim. Condutas em infectologia. São Paulo, Atheneu, 2004. p.446-457, tab.
Monografía en Portugués | LILACS, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: lil-407440
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA