RESUMEN
The need for fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the patient with hemoptysis and a normal or nonlocalizing chest roentgenogram remains a subject of debate. Currently, diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy is recommended as the investigative procedure of choice. To develop predictors that identify the patient in whom fiberoptic bronchoscopy is most likely to be diagnostic, we reviewed our community's experience with this population over a five-year period. We identified 196 patients with hemoptysis and a normal or nonlocalizing chest roentgenogram who underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Three quarters were active or previous smokers. We examined the relationship of advancing age, sex, smoking, nonspecific roentgenographic findings and the amount, duration, and previous bouts of hemoptysis to the incidence of a diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Twelve patients (6 percent) had bronchogenic carcinoma and 33 (17 percent) another specific cause for the hemoptysis identified by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. By univariate and discriminant analyses, we found that the three factors of age of 50 years or more, male sex, and smoking of 40 pack-years or more best predicted a diagnosis of malignancy. Bleeding in excess of 30 ml daily was associated with an increase in overall diagnostic yield. The presence of two of the three factors associated with malignancy or bleeding in excess of 30 ml daily (or both) identified 100 percent of the patients with bronchogenic carcinoma and 82 percent of all of the diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopic procedures. use of these criteria in selecting the patient for fiberoptic bronchoscopy could have reduced our use of the bronchoscope by 28 percent, with the remaining patients safely observed.
Asunto(s)
Broncoscopía , Hemoptisis/etiología , Radiografía Torácica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bronquiectasia/complicaciones , Bronquiectasia/diagnóstico , Bronquiectasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Bronquitis/complicaciones , Bronquitis/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Broncogénico/complicaciones , Carcinoma Broncogénico/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Broncogénico/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Tecnología de Fibra Óptica , Hemoptisis/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , FumarRESUMEN
Bronchoscopic examination to diagnose lung metastases has not been as rewarding as in primary lung cancer. Despite a lower expected yield, we believe the procedure has value in certain patients, ie, those with clinical findings of endobronchial disease. To determine better the value of bronchoscopy in this population, we retrospectively reviewed records of patients at five community teaching hospitals over a 66-month period. These patients all underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy. They had a history of prior nonpulmonary malignancy and an abnormal chest roentgenogram suspicious for recurrent malignant disease, or they presented with abnormal chest roentgenographic findings and further evaluation showed the lung disease to be metastatic. Bronchoscopy for metastatic lung disease was most likely diagnostic in patients with primary colorectal cancer (79 percent) and breast cancer (57 percent), and least likely in patients with genitourinary tract cancer (33 percent). Hemoptysis, signs of local airway obstruction, or a roentgenogram showing either atelectasis or diffuse lung disease especially favored a positive biopsy. Bronchoscopy is a valuable diagnostic procedure in selected patients with metastatic lung disease.