RESUMEN

Computer visualization techniques (CVTs) are an emerging technology that can organize all cancer specialists. This article describes CVTs' ability to maximize the currently untapped advantages of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The visual speed and dynamic strategies inherent in CVTs improves IMRT by distilling vast amounts of anatomic, multimodal imaging, textual/meaning, and surgical/outcome data into a large, rigorous, standardized evidence base of storable target delineation plans. This ability to standardize strategies will allow the collection of meaningful evidence based outcome data.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is gaining widespread use in the radiation therapy community. Prostate cancer is the ideal target for IMRT due to the growing body of literature supporting dose escalation and normal tissue limitations. The need for dose escalation and the limits of conventional radiation therapy necessitate precise patient and prostate localization as well as advanced treatment delivery. The treatment of prostate cancer has been dramatically altered by the introduction of technology that can focus on the target while avoiding normal tissue. IMRT is evolving as the treatment of the future for prostate cancer.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report acute toxicity and to evaluate the relationship between dose-volume effects and acute toxicity in patients with localized prostate cancer, treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Acute toxicity (both lower gastrointestinal [GI] and genito-urinary [GU]) in 100 patients treated with IMRT definitively to a prescribed dose of 70 Gy were assessed using RTOG scoring criteria. A rectal balloon was used for prostate immobilization. Mean doses to seminal vesicles, prostate, bladder, and rectum were recorded. Average irradiated bladder and rectal volumes above 65, 70, and 75 Gy were assessed. A relationship between dose volume and clinical toxicity was evaluated. All patients completed the full duration of acute toxicity assessment. RESULTS: Mean doses to the prostate and seminal vesicles were 75.8 and 73.9 Gy. This represents a moderate dose escalation. Acute GI toxicity profile was very favorable. Eleven percent and 6% of the patients had grade 1 and 2 GI toxicity, respectively, while 83% had no GI complaint. For GU complaints, 38% and 35% had grade 1 and 2 toxicity, respectively, while 27% had no complaints. There was no grade 3 or higher acute GI or GU toxicity. Mean doses to the bladder were 22.8, 23.4, and 26.1 Gy for grade 0, 1, and 2 GU toxicity, respectively (p = 0.132). There is no statistically significant relationship between acute GU toxicity and the bladder volume receiving > 65 Gy, > 70 Gy, or > 75 Gy. In evaluating acute GI toxicity, there are very few grade 1 and 2 events. No relationship was found between acute rectal toxicity and mean rectal dose or irradiated rectal volumes receiving more than 65, 70, and 75 Gy. CONCLUSION: The findings are important with regard to the safety of IMRT, especially in reducing acute GI toxicity. Dose escalation with IMRT using a prostate immobilization technique is feasible. The findings are also important because they contribute to the clinical and dosimetric correlation aspect in the use of IMRT to treat prostate cancer. A larger cohort may be needed to determine if there is a relationship between acute GU toxicity and (a) mean bladder dose and (b) irradiated bladder volume receiving > 65 Gy, > 70 Gy, or > 75 Gy. A larger cohort of patients treated to a higher dose may be needed to show a relationship between dose volume and acute GI toxicity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report our initial experience on postprostatectomy IMRT (PPI), addressing acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity in comparison to primary IMRT (PI) for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From April 1998 to December 1999, 40 postprostatectomy patients were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to a median prescribed dose of 64 Gy (mean dose of 69 Gy). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scoring system was used to assess acute GU toxicity. Target volume and maximum and mean doses were evaluated. The mean doses to the bladder and irradiated bladder volume receiving >65 Gy were assessed. These were compared to those of 125 patients treated with PI to a prescribed dose of 70 Gy (mean dose of 76 Gy). RESULTS: The acute GU toxicity profile is more favorable in the PPI group with 82.5% of Grade 0-1 and 17.5% of Grade 2 toxicity compared to 59.2% and 40.8%, respectively, in the PI group (p < 0.001). There was no Grade 3 or higher toxicity in either group. The target volume was larger in the PPI group, while the maximum and mean doses to the target were higher in the PI group. The mean dose delivered to the bladder was higher in the PPI group. The irradiated bladder volume receiving >65 Gy was significantly larger in the PI group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PPI can be delivered with acceptable ute GU toxicity. The larger PPI target volume may be related to the difficulty in delineating prostatic fossa. Despite a larger target volume and a higher mean dose to the bladder, PPI produced a more favorable acute GU toxicity profile. This may be related to a combination of lower mean and maximum doses and smaller bladder volumes receiving >65 Gy in the PPI group, as well as urethral rather than bladder irradiation. The findings have implications in the evaluation of IMRT treatment plan for prostate cancer, whereby the irradiated bladder volumes above 65 Gy may be more meaningful than the mean dose to the bladder. Longer term toxicity results are awaited.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report the initial experience in the definitive treatment of head and neck carcinomas using SMART (Simultaneous Modulated Accelerated Radiation Therapy) boost technique. Radiation was delivered via IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy). The following parameters were evaluated: acute toxicity, initial tumor response, clinical feasibility, dosimetry and cost. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1996 and December 1997, 20 patients with primary head and neck carcinomas were treated with SMART boost technique. The treatment fields encompassed two simultaneous targets. The primary target included palpable and visible disease sites. The secondary target included regions at risk for microscopic disease. Daily fractions of 2.4 Gy and 2 Gy were prescribed and delivered to the primary and secondary targets to a total dose of 60 Gy and 50 Gy, respectively. Lower neck nodes were treated with a single conventional anterior portal. This fractionation schedule was completed in 5 weeks with 5 daily fractions weekly. Toxicity was evaluated by RTOG acute toxicity grading criteria, evidence of infection at immobilization screw sites, subjective salivary function, weight loss, and the need for treatment split. Mean follow-up was 15.2 months. Initial tumor response was assessed by clinical and radiographical examinations. Clinical feasibility was evaluated by the criteria: time to treat patient, immobilization, and treatment planning and QA time. In dosimetry, we evaluated the mean doses of both targets and normal tissues and percent targets' volume below goal. To evaluate cost, Medicare allowable charge for SMART boost was compared to those of conventional fractionated and accelerated radiotherapy. RESULTS: ACUTE TOXICITY: None of the patients had a screw site infection and all patients healed well after completion of radiotherapy. Sixteen of 20 patients (80%) completed the treatment within 40 days without any split. Sixteen patients (80%) had RTOG Grade 3 mucositis while 10 patients (50%) had Grade 3 pharyngitis. Three of 20 patients (15%) had weight loss greater than 10% of their pretreatment weight. Ten patients (50%) required intravenous fluids, tube feeding or both. Nine patients (45%) reported moderate xerostomia with significant relief reported within 6 months. INITIAL TUMOR RESPONSE: 19 patients (95 %) had complete response (CR) while one had partial response (PR). The patient with PR had stable disease on imaging at 12 months follow-up. Two patients were found to have lung metastases at 2 months and 5 months follow-up. To date, there have been two local recurrences in the complete responders. Both patients had nasopharyngeal primary; one was retreated with radioactive Cesium-137 implant and the other died from the disease. CLINICAL FEASIBILITY: The average treatment time for a three-arc treatment was 17.5 minutes and 2.5 minutes for each additional arc. Eleven patients (55%) had four-arc treatment while six patients (30%) had five-arc treatment and three patients (15%) had three-arc treatment. Immobilization was reproducible within less than 2 mm. The treatment planning, QA and documentation prior to treatment averaged 2 days. DOSIMETRY: The mean doses to the primary and secondary targets were 64.4 Gy and 54.4 Gy, respectively; 8.9% of the primary target volume and 11.6% of the secondary target volume were below prescribed dose goal. The mean dose delivered to the mandible was 30 Gy, spinal cord 17 Gy, ipsilateral parotid 23 Gy, and contralateral parotid 21 Gy. COST: Total Medicare allowable charge for SMART boost was $7000 compared to $8600 (conventional) and $9400 (accelerated fractionation). CONCLUSIONS: SMART boost technique is an accelerated radiotherapy scheme that can be delivered with acceptable toxicity. It allows parotid sparing as evidenced both clinically and by dosimetry. Initial tumor response has been encouraging. It is clinically feasible and cost saving. A larger population of patients and a long-term fol

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The treatment of optic nerve sheath meningiomas (ONSM) is controversial. Radiation therapy has been used with some success in patients with progressive visual loss. We report a case of visual improvement in a patient with an optic nerve sheath meningioma and progressive visual field loss, treated with conformal radiotherapy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the stereotactic radiosurgery treatment plans generated by a conventional radiosurgery treatment system with the plan generated by a system using intensity modulated beams. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Optimized conformal radiation treatment plans were generated for both single and multiple intracranial lesions using a conventional radiosurgery treatment-planning system computer and the Peacock treatment-planning computer. The Peacock system is a conformal therapy system that uses intensity modulated beams, back projection, and the simulated annealing optimization technique. The dose delivered to critical structures and the target volume were compared by means of dose volume histograms between plans generated by the two different systems. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) stereotactic radiosurgery criteria were also used to evaluate each plan. RESULTS: (a) For a single small target, radiosurgery plans generated by the conventional radiosurgery system and the Peacock system were comparable. (b) For two separate small targets, where nonoverlapping arcs could be used, plans generated by the two systems were also comparable. (c) For a single large (>4 cm) irregular-shaped target, the Peacock system appeared to be able to generate a treatment plan superior to that of the conventional radiosurgery system. CONCLUSIONS: A treatment plan generated using intensity modulated beams appears to be superior to a multiple isocenter plan using a conventional radiosurgery system, for the treatment of a large irregular shaped intracranial target.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated beam systems have been developed as a means of creating a high-dose region that closely conforms to the prescribed target volume while also providing specific sparing of organs at risk within complex treatment geometries. The slice-by-slice treatment paradigm used by one such system for delivering intensity modulated fields introduces regions of dose nonuniformity where each pair of treatment slices abut. A study was designed to evaluate whether or not the magnitude of the nonuniformity that results from this segmental delivery paradigm is significant relative to the overall dose nonuniformity present in the intensity modulation technique itself. An assessment was also made as to the increase in nonuniformity that would result if errors were made in indexing during treatment delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were generated to simulate correctly indexed and incorrectly indexed treatments of 4, 10, and 18 cm diameter targets. Indexing errors of from 0.1 to 2.0 mm were studied. Treatment plans were also generated for targets of the same diameter but of lengths that did not require indexing of the treatment couch. RESULTS: The nonuniformity that results from the intensity modulation delivery paradigm is 11-16% for targets where indexing is not required. Correct indexing of the couch adds an additional 1-2% in nonuniformity. However, a couch indexing error of as little as 1 mm can increase the total nonuniformity to as much as 25%. All increases in nonuniformity from indexing are essentially independent of target diameter. CONCLUSIONS: The dose nonuniformity introduced by the segmental strip delivery paradigm is small relative to the nonuniformity present in the intensity modulation paradigm itself. A positioning accuracy of better than 0.5 mm appears to be required when implementing segmental intensity modulated treatment plans.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Peacock is a 3-D conformal treatment planning and delivery system for conformal radiation therapy which delivers intensity-modulated fields. A group of 13 patients were treated between March and February, 1995. Patient age ranged from 10 to 74. Six of the patients had previously received radiation therapy. Target volume was from 2.5 to 70 cm3: all treatments were fractionated, using single table angle plan with 270 degrees of rotation. A removable invasive cranial screw fixation device was used in all cases. Treated isodose line averaged 85%; conformality index was better than 2, with 0-5% of critical structure volume exceeding dose limits. Setup time averaged 8 min per fraction: treatment time ranged from 10 to 80 min. There were two equipment failures in 200 fractions/1,000 gantry rotations. Patient position averaged about 1 mm within initial setup. Follow-up has revealed no complications from the radiation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

To investigate the use of teleradiology in the quality assurance programme of a multicentre radiotherapy practice, we installed image acquisition and display workstations at each of two affiliated radiation oncology clinics. A commercial diagnostic teleradiology system was successfully modified to suit the requirements of the radiotherapy subspecialty. The system allowed intersite transmission of images, access to high-resolution images from each site and, by use of laser film scanners, made accessible all types of radiation therapy image. Transmission speed and storage capacity were better than expected. Using the system, radiation oncology residents and staff reviewed 83 complex cases over eight months. Case presentation and discussion were enhanced. In the same period, 276 cases were reviewed by conference in person. Case conferences for quality assurance conducted with the teleradiology system influenced changes in treatment planning as effectively as those conducted in person. Equivalent treatment outcomes were produced. The teleradiology system facilitated quality assurance through review of patients' radiation treatments by allowing natural interactive consultation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Theories of ionisation in liquid and the use of liquid ionisation chambers in mixed neutron field dosimetry have been studied. Theoretical models developed by Jaffe and by Onsager were used for comparison with the experimental measurements. The Jaffe method predicts a higher collecting efficiency than does the Onsager model. Gamma and neutron sensitivities of a liquid chamber can be calculated by the Bragg-Gray principle and Onsager's theory. The calculation is subject to relatively large uncertainties, mainly due to insufficient knowledge of the ion distribution in ionisation tracks and of W/e values for iso-octane. The chamber constructed for clinical use should work best for mixed neutron fields with gamma-neutron ratios of 10-20%; however, it would be difficult to use a liquid ionisation chamber to detect small neutron variations in mixed fields with large gamma components.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Zero-degree neutron energy spectra for the p(41)-Be and d(49)-Be reactions were measured by time-of-flight for neutrons with energies above 1.9 and 1.4 MeV, respectively. Spectral changes resulting from the addition of copper, aluminum, and polyethylene filters to unfiltered beams were determined. Integral yields, average energies, filter material attenuation coefficients, and kerma fractions were computed for these spectra. Calculated spectra for neutron beams filtered by various thicknesses of polyethylene compared favorably with experimental results

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Factors which contribute to measurement errors associated with the use of radiotracers to measure protein adsorption are considered. Techniques for removal of excess adsorbent solution and for estimation of surface area are described. Artifacts induced by the incorporation of a radio-label both by specific adsorption of the labeling atom and by changes in the protein are discussed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In the United States it is common practice to calibrate Cobalt-60 teletherapy machines "in air," despite recommendations by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) and other organizations that calibration be accomplished by measurement at 5-cm depth in a water phantom. A comparison has been made between the results of ionization measurements in air at 80.5-cm distance from the source and in water at 80-cm source-skin distance (SSD) for the determination of absorbed dose at three depth (5, 10, and 15 cm) for each of three fields sizes (6 X 6, 10 X 10, and 20 X 20 cm2), for a total of 42 Cobalt-60 machines. The mean of the ratio, absorbed dose from in-water measurements to absorbed dose at the same depth calculated from in-air measurements, ranged frt 5-cm depth for a 20 X 20-cm2 field size. Reasons for the differences are offered, and compliance with ICRU recommendations is suggested.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)