RESUMEN
Sinus puncture and aspiration is an invasive procedure that hinders patient enrollment in studies of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis (ABMS). Pain and minor bleeding also limit its potential diagnostic utility in clinical practice. Cultures obtained by rigid nasal endoscopy were compared with those from sinus puncture and aspiration in 53 patients with ABMS; 46 patients were assessable. Considering recovery of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, or Streptococcus pneumoniae from puncture and aspiration as the gold standard, endoscopy cultures demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.7% (95% confidence interval, 56.2-97.5), specificity of 90.6% (73.8-97.5), positive predictive value of 80% (51.4-94.7), negative predictive value of 93.5% (77.2-98.9), and accuracy of 89.1% (75.6-95.9). Ten adverse events related to puncture and aspiration occurred in 5 (9.6%) of 52 patients; there were no endoscopy-related adverse events. In our study, the largest to date, endoscopic sampling compared favorably with puncture and aspiration for identifying H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, and S. pneumoniae in ABMS and produced less morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Endoscopía , Seno Maxilar , Sinusitis Maxilar/microbiología , Nariz/cirugía , Punciones , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Sinusitis Maxilar/diagnóstico , Sinusitis Maxilar/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sparfloxacin in the treatment of patients with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis, the microbiologic etiology of which was determined by maxillary sinus puncture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-three patients enrolled in the open, noncomparative trial received sparfloxacin as a 400-mg loading dose followed by 200 mg once daily doses for a total of 10 days. One hundred ninety-eight patients were clinically evaluable and 82 were also bacteriologically evaluable. All treated patients were included in the safety analysis. Overall success was determined based on clinical success (resolution or reduction of signs and symptoms and sinus x-rays) and bacteriologic success (eradication and presumed eradication of baseline pathogens obtained by maxillary sinus puncture and aspiration). RESULTS: Overall success in the bacteriologically evaluable population at test-of-cure was 91.5% [75/82; 95% confidence interval (85.4%, 97.5%)]. For all pathogens, the eradication rate was 93.2% (109/117 baseline pathogens); individual pathogen eradication rates were 88.9% (16/18) for S. pneumoniae (including those strains exhibiting decreased susceptibility to penicillin); and 100% for H. influenzae (17/17), S. aureus (14/14), and M. catarrhalis (11/11). The majority of adverse events were of mild or moderate severity; the most frequently related adverse events were photosensitivity reaction, headache, nausea, and diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Sparfloxacin had an overall success rate of 91.5% for patients in this study and was generally well tolerated in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.