RESUMEN

Background: Among individuals with heart failure (HF), racial differences in comorbidities may be mediated by social determinants of health (SDOH). Methods: Black and White US community-dwelling participants in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study aged ≥ 45 years with an adjudicated HF hospitalization between 2003 and 2017 were included in this cross-sectional analysis. We assessed whether higher prevalence of comorbidities in Black participants compared to White participants were mediated by SDOH in socioeconomic, environment/housing, social support, and healthcare access domains, using the inverse odds weighting method. Results: Black (n = 240) compared to White (n = 293) participants with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) had higher prevalence of diabetes [1.38 (95% CI: 1.18 - 1.61)], chronic kidney disease [1.21 (95% CI: 1.01 - 1.45)], and anemia [1.33 (95% CI: 1.02 - 1.75)] and lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation [0.80 (95% CI: (0.65 - 0.98)]. Black (n = 314) compared to White (n = 367) participants with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) had higher prevalence of hypertension [1.04 (95% CI: 1.02 - 1.07)] and diabetes [1.26 (95% CI: 1.09 - 1.45)] and lower prevalence of coronary artery disease [0.86 (95% CI: 0.78 - 0.94)] and atrial fibrillation [0.70 (95% CI: 0.58 - 0.83)]. Socioeconomic status explained 14.5%, 26.5% and 40% of excess diabetes, anemia, and chronic kidney disease among Black adults with HFpEF; however; mediation was not statistically significant and no other SDOH substantially mediated differences in comorbidity prevalence. Conclusions: Socioeconomic status partially mediated excess diabetes, anemia, and chronic kidney disease experienced by Black adults with HFpEF, but differences in other comorbidities were not explained by other SDOH examined.

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to investigate whether interventions to discontinue or down-titrate heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapy are feasible and associated with risks in older people. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Electronic databases were searched from inception to 8 March 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies included people with HF, aged ≥50 years and who discontinued or down-titrated HF pharmacotherapy. Outcomes were feasibility (whether discontinuation or down-titration of HF pharmacotherapy was sustained at follow-up) and associated risks (mortality, hospitalization, adverse drug withdrawal effects [ADWE]). Random-effects meta-analysis was performed when heterogeneity was not substantial (Higgins I2 < 70%). Sub-analysis by frailty status was conducted. Six RCTs (536 participants) and 27 observational studies (810 499 participants) across six therapeutic classes were included, for 3-260 weeks follow-up. RCTs were conducted in patients presenting with stable chronic HF. Down-titrating a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) in patients with chronic kidney disease was 76% more likely than continuation (risk ratio [RR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.73), with no difference in mortality (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.30-1.64). Discontinuation of beta-blockers were feasible compared to continuation in preserved ejection fraction (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.68-1.47). Participants were 25% more likely to re-initiate discontinued diuretics (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.86). Digoxin discontinuation was associated with 5.5-fold risk of hospitalization compared to continuation. Worsening HF was the most common ADWE. One observational study measured frailty but did not report outcomes by frailty status. The appropriateness and associated risks of down-titrating or discontinuing HF pharmacotherapy in people aged ≥75 years is uncertain. Evaluation of outcomes by frailty status necessitates investigation.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Use of heart failure-exacerbating medications (HFEMs) may lead to preventable episodes of acute decompensated heart failure (HF). HFEMs use is common in patients with HF, and there may be opportunities to reduce their use from the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We performed an observational study on patients with HF presenting to EDs within a healthcare system between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020. Patients with chronic HF were identified using diagnostic codes within the electronic health record. The cohort was restricted to ambulatory (i.e., discharged to home) ED encounters. Medications, either ordered in the ED or prescribed at ED discharge, were extracted from the medication administration record and identified as potential HFEMs based on the 2016 American Heart Association Scientific Statement. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the prevalence of HFEM use during ambulatory ED encounters. Exploratory analyses to identify correlates of HFEM use were performed. RESULTS: The study cohort included 23,907 ED encounters. ED administration or prescription of HFEMs occurred during 20% of ambulatory ED encounters. HFEM administration in the ED (17%) was more common than HFEM prescription at ED discharge (6%). The most common HFEMs administered in the ED included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (11%) and albuterol (7%). CONCLUSION: HFEM use is common in patients with HF seeking ED care, occurring in roughly one-fifth of ambulatory ED encounters. There may be opportunities to optimize medication use among patients with HF in the ED.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is common among adults with heart failure (HF) and associated with poor outcomes. However, less is known about the trajectory of cognitive decline after a first HF hospitalization. We examined the rate of cognitive decline among adults with incident HF hospitalization compared with those without HF hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: The REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) study is a prospective longitudinal study of 23 894 participants aged ≥45 years free of HF at baseline. HF hospitalization was expert adjudicated. Changes in global cognitive function (primary outcome) were assessed with the Six-Item Screener (range, 0-6). Secondary outcomes included change in Word List Learning (range, 0-30), Word List Delayed Recall (WLD; range, 0-10), and Animal Fluency Test (range, 0+). Segmented linear mixed-effects regression models were used. Over 5 years, mean scores across all 4 cognitive tests declined for all participants regardless of HF status. Those with incident HF hospitalization experienced faster declines in the Six-Item Screener versus those who were HF free (difference, -0.031 [95% CI, -0.047 to -0.016]; P<0.001), a finding that persisted in fully adjusted models. Those with incident HF hospitalization did not experience faster declines in Word List Learning, Word List Delayed Recall, or Animal Fluency Test scores compared with those without HF hospitalization. Participants with hospitalization for HF with preserved, compared with reduced, ejection fraction had faster decline in Animal Fluency Test. CONCLUSIONS: Global cognitive decline occurred faster among adults with incident HF hospitalization compared with those who remained free of HF hospitalization. This pattern was not seen for the other cognitive domains.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physician underprescribing and patient nonadherence are major barriers to the benefits of guideline-directed medical therapy. An important contributor to both underprescribing and patient nonadherence is concern about medication-related side effects. Yet, there are few to no data on approaches used by physicians to: (1) elicit medication-related side effects, (2) attribute these side effects to specific medications, and (3) take appropriate action. METHODS AND RESULTS: The authors conducted semistructured interviews with physicians to identify facilitators and barriers to each critical step of heart failure medication management: elicitation of side effects, attribution of side effects to a medication, and action in response to attributed side effects. Interviews were transcribed and coded using directed content analysis. For elicitation of potential side effects, limited patient communication and family discordance in reporting were key barriers, whereas guiding questions, measurement, and open channels of communication were key facilitators. For attribution of side effects, confounding from other medications, limited time for clinical encounters, and nonspecific symptoms were key barriers, whereas time-limited medication discontinuation trials and medication rechallenges were key facilitators. For taking action, challenges with weighing risks and benefits and physician fear about causing harm or interfering with other clinicians were barriers, whereas patient-physician communication and the results of a medication discontinuation trials and medication rechallenge were facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: This study generated key facilitators and barriers to 3 key aspects of heart failure medication management related to side effects that should drive future work to improve heart failure medication management.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: N-of-1 trials have emerged as a personalized approach to patient-centered care, where patients can compare evidence-based treatments using their own data. However, little is known about optimal methods to present individual-level data from medication-related N-of-1 trials to patients to promote decision-making. OBJECTIVES: We conducted qualitative interviews with patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) undergoing N-of-1 trials to iterate, refine, and optimize a patient-facing data visualization tool for displaying results of N-of-1 medication trials. The goal of optimizing this tool was to promote patients' understanding of their individual health information, and to ultimately facilitate shared decision-making about continuing or discontinuing their medication. METHODS: We conducted 32 semi-structured qualitative interviews with 9 participants over the course of their participation in N-of-1 trials. The N-of-1 trials were conducted to facilitate a comparison of continuing versus discontinuing a beta-blocker. Interviews were conducted in-person or over the phone after each treatment period to evaluate participant perspectives on a data visualization tool prototype. Data were coded using directed content analysis by two independent reviewers and included a third reviewer to reach consensus when needed. Major themes were extracted and iteratively incorporated into the patient-facing data visualization tool. RESULTS: Nine participants provided feedback on how their data was displayed in the visualization tool. After qualitative analysis, three major themes emerged that informed our final interface. Participants preferred: 1) clearly stated individual symptom scores, 2) a reference image with labels to guide their interpretation of symptom information, and 3) qualitative language over numbers alone conveying the meaning of changes in their scores (e.g., better, worse). CONCLUSIONS: Feedback informed the design of a patient-facing data visualization tool for medication-related N-of-1 trials. Future work should include usability and comprehension testing of this interface on a larger scale.

RESUMEN

Background: Underprescribing of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) persists. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess polypharmacy as a barrier to GDMT. Methods: We examined participants hospitalized for HF with reduced ejection fraction and HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction between 2003 and 2017 from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study. Participants were stratified by admission medication count-0 to 4, 5 to 9, and ≥10 medications. We examined GDMT use at admission, GDMT contraindications, and initiation of eligible indicated GDMT by medication count. We conducted a multivariable Poisson regression with robust standard errors to examine the association between medication count and GDMT initiation. GDMT included agents for HF with reduced ejection fraction/HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction, antiplatelet agents and statins for coronary artery disease, and anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation. Results: Among 545 participants with HF, 34% were not taking a beta-blocker, 39% were not taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, or hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate, and 90% were not taking a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist at admission; among participants with coronary artery disease, 36% were not taking an antiplatelet agent, and 38% were not taking a statin; and among participants with atrial fibrillation, 49% were not taking an anticoagulant. Polypharmacy was inversely associated with initiation of at least one indicated medication (5-9 medications: relative risk [RR]: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.56-0.82; P < 0.001; ≥10 medications: RR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.39-0.64; P < 0.001) and initiation of at least half of indicated medications (5-9 medications: RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51-0.81; P < 0.001; ≥10 medications: RR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.38-0.67; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Polypharmacy is an important barrier to GDMT.

RESUMEN

Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) predominantly affects older adults with multiple chronic conditions, leading to significant physical, cognitive, and emotional challenges. New disease-modifying drugs are effective in early stages, prompting a shift toward comprehensive assessments, including functional capacity and quality of life. However, these assessments may not fully capture the complexity of older ATTR-CA patients, especially regarding frailty and mood disorders, which can influence symptom reporting. Thus, integrating comprehensive geriatric assessment tools into routine clinical practice may be crucial to detect early signs of frailty or functional impairment that could impact outcomes and mitigate futility and ageism in the decision-making process. This review highlights the importance of evaluating multimorbidity, disability, and frailty in older patients with ATTR-CA to optimize management strategies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular disease exacts a heavy toll on health and quality of life and is the leading cause of death among people ≥65 years of age. Although medical, surgical, and device therapies can certainly prolong a life span, disease progression from chronic to advanced to end stage is temporally unpredictable, uncertain, and marked by worsening symptoms that result in recurrent hospitalizations and excessive health care use. Compared with other serious illnesses, medication management that incorporates a palliative approach is underused among individuals with cardiovascular disease. This scientific statement describes palliative pharmacotherapy inclusive of cardiovascular drugs and essential palliative medicines that work synergistically to control symptoms and enhance quality of life. We also summarize and clarify available evidence on the utility of guideline-directed and evidence-based medical therapies in individuals with end-stage heart failure, pulmonary arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease, and other cardiomyopathies while providing clinical considerations for de-escalating or deprescribing. Shared decision-making and goal-oriented care are emphasized and considered quintessential to the iterative process of patient-centered medication management across the spectrum of cardiovascular disease.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: Limited data are available that evaluate the efficacy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) dose-reduction in older adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction following a heart failure hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries with prescription coverage who were discharged to home following a hospitalization for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction between 1 January 2007 and 30 June 2018 and were treated with RASI prior to hospitalization. We classified patients into three mutually exclusive groups based on RASI dosage before (prescription fills up to 90 days prior to) and after a hospitalization (prescription fills up to 365 days that were most proximate to the discharge date as possible)-same/increased dose, dose-reduction, and discontinuation. We examined associations between RASI prescribing patterns and outcomes (mortality and all-cause readmission at 30 days and 1 year) using Cox proportional hazards models. Among 12 794 unique older adults, 36.8% experienced a RASI reduction following their hospitalization for HFrEF-15.7% had a dose-reduction and 21.1% had a discontinuation. Neither dose-reduction nor discontinuation was associated with 30-day mortality. Discontinuation was associated 1-year mortality, 30-day all-cause readmission, and 1-year all-cause readmission, whereas dose-reduction was not. CONCLUSION: RASI dose-reduction occurs in 1 out of 7 HF hospitalizations. In contrast to RASI discontinuation, RASI dose-reduction was not associated with adverse short or long-term outcomes. These findings indicate that RASI dose-reduction is preferred over RASI discontinuation in selected situations where RASI reduction is needed.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinicians and patients often face a decision to continue or discontinue statins. We examined the impact of discontinuation of statins compared with continuation on clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, cardiovascular [CV] mortality, CV events, and quality of life). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case-control studies, and quasi-randomized studies among people ≥18 years were eligible. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Registry (inception to August 2023). Two independent reviewers performed screening and extracted data. Quality assessment was performed by one author and verified by another. We summarized results narratively, performed meta-analysis for a subset of studies, and used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence. We summarized findings in the subgroup of persons ≥75 years. RESULTS: We retrieved 8369 titles/abstracts; 37 reports from 36 studies were eligible. This comprised 35 non-randomized studies (n = 1,708,684) and 1 RCT (n = 381). The 1 RCT was conducted among persons with life expectancy <1 year and showed there is probably no difference in 60-day mortality (risk difference = 3.5%, 90% CI -3.5 to 10.5) for statin discontinuation compared with continuation. Non-randomized studies varied in terms of population and setting, but consistently suggested that statin discontinuation might be associated with a relative increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.92, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.44, nine studies), CV mortality (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.10, five reports), and CV events (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.39, eight reports). Findings in people ≥75 years were consistent with main results. There was a high degree of uncertainty in findings from non-randomized studies due to methodological limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Statin discontinuation does not appear to affect short-term mortality near end-of-life based on one RCT. Outside of this population, findings from non-randomized studies consistently suggested statin discontinuation may be associated with worse outcomes, though this is uncertain.

RESUMEN

Background: Statins are highly effective for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and mortality. Data on the benefit of statins in adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and without ASCVD are limited. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether statins are associated with a lower risk of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in HFpEF. Methods: Veterans Health Administration data from 2002 to 2016, linked to Medicare and Medicaid claims and pharmaceutical data, were collected. Patients had a new HFpEF diagnosis and no known ASCVD or prior statin use at baseline. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to evaluate the association of new statin use with outcomes (all-cause mortality and MACE). Propensity score overlap weighting (PSW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Results: Among 7,970 Veterans, 47% initiated a statin over a mean 6.0-year follow-up. At HFpEF diagnosis, mean age was 69 ± 12 years, 96% were male, 67% were White, 14% were Black, and mean EF was 60% ± 6%. Before PSW, statin users were younger with more prevalent metabolic syndrome, arthritis, and other chronic conditions. All characteristics were balanced after PSW. There were 5,314 deaths and 4,859 MACE events. After PSW, the hazard for all-cause mortality for statin users vs nonusers was 22% lower (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.73-0.83). The HR for MACE was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.60-0.80) for all-cause hospitalization, and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59-0.88) for HF hospitalization. Conclusions: New statin use was associated with reduced all-cause mortality, MACE, and hospitalization in Veterans with HFpEF without prevalent ASCVD.

RESUMEN

Importance: Individual cohort studies concur that the amyloidogenic V142I variant of the transthyretin (TTR) gene, present in 3% to 4% of US Black individuals, increases heart failure (HF) and mortality risk. Precisely defining carrier risk across relevant clinical outcomes and estimating population burden of disease are important given established and emerging targeted treatments. Objectives: To better define the natural history of disease in carriers across mid to late life, assess variant modifiers, and estimate cardiovascular burden to the US population. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 23 338 self-reported Black participants initially free from HF were included in 4 large observational studies across the US (mean [SD], 15.5 [8.2] years of follow-up). Data analysis was performed between May 2023 and February 2024. Exposure: V142I carrier status (n = 754, 3.2%). Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospitalizations for HF (including subtypes of reduced and preserved ejection fraction) and all-cause mortality. Outcomes were analyzed by generating 10-year hazard ratios for each age between 50 and 90 years. Using actuarial methods, mean survival by carrier status was estimated and applied to the 2022 US population using US Census data. Results: Among the 23 338 participants, the mean (SD) age at baseline was 62 (9) years and 76.7% were women. Ten-year carrier risk increased for HF hospitalization by age 63 years, predominantly driven by HF with reduced ejection fraction, and 10-year all-cause mortality risk increased by age 72 years. Only age (but not sex or other select variables) modified risk with the variant, with estimated reductions in longevity ranging from 1.9 years (95% CI, 0.6-3.1) at age 50 to 2.8 years (95% CI, 2.0-3.6) at age 81. Based on these data, 435 851 estimated US Black carriers between ages 50 and 95 years are projected to cumulatively lose 957 505 years of life (95% CI, 534 475-1 380 535) due to the variant. Conclusions and Relevance: Among self-reported Black individuals, male and female V142I carriers faced similar and substantial risk for HF hospitalization, predominantly with reduced ejection fraction, and death, with steep age-dependent penetrance. Delineating the individual contributions of, and complex interplay among, the V142I variant, ancestry, the social construct of race, and biological or social determinants of health to cardiovascular disease merits further investigation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: The TRANSFORM-HF trial demonstrated no significant outcome differences between torsemide and furosemide following hospitalization for heart failure (HF), but may have been impacted by non-adherence to the randomized diuretic. The current study sought to determine the treatment effect of torsemide versus furosemide using an on-treatment analysis inclusive of all randomized patients except those confirmed non-adherent to study diuretic. METHODS AND RESULTS: TRANSFORM-HF was an open-label, pragmatic randomized trial of 2859 patients hospitalized for HF from June 2018 through March 2022. Patients were randomized to a loop diuretic strategy of torsemide versus furosemide with investigator-selected dosage. This post-hoc on-treatment analysis included all patients alive with either known or unknown diuretic status, and excluded patients confirmed to be non-adherent to study diuretic. This modified on-treatment definition was applied separately at time of hospital discharge and 30-day follow-up. All-cause mortality and hospitalization outcomes were assessed over 12 months. Overall, 2570 (89.9%) and 2374 (83.0%) patients were included in on-treatment analyses at discharge and 30-day follow-up, respectively. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between torsemide and furosemide in patients on-treatment at discharge (17.5% vs. 17.8%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.01 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.22], p = 0.96) and at 30-day follow-up (14.5% vs. 15.0%; HR 1.02 [95% CI 0.81-1.27], p = 0.90). All-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization was similar between torsemide and furosemide in patients who were on-treatment at discharge (58.3% vs. 61.3%; HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.82-1.03]) and 30-day follow-up (60.9% vs. 64.4%; HR 0.93 [95% CI 0.82-1.05]). In patients who were on-treatment at 30-day follow-up, there were 677 total hospitalizations in the torsemide group and 686 total hospitalizations in the furosemide group (rate ratio 0.99 [95% CI 0.86-1.14], p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: In TRANSFORM-HF, a post-hoc on-treatment analysis did not meaningfully differ from the original trial results. Among those deemed compliant with the assigned diuretic, there remained no significant difference in mortality or hospitalization after HF hospitalization with a strategy of torsemide versus furosemide. CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03296813.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no standardised approach to screening adults for social risk factors. The goal of this study was to develop mortality risk prediction models based on the social determinants of health (SDoH) for clinical risk stratification. METHODS: Data were used from REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, a national, population-based, longitudinal cohort of black and white Americans aged ≥45 recruited between 2003 and 2007. Analysis was limited to participants with available SDoH and mortality data (n=20 843). All-cause mortality, available through 31 December 2018, was modelled using Cox proportional hazards with baseline individual, area-level and business-level SDoH as predictors. The area-level Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) was included for comparison. All models were adjusted for age, sex and sampling region and underwent internal split-sample validation. RESULTS: The baseline prediction model including only age, sex and REGARDS sampling region had a c-statistic of 0.699. An individual-level SDoH model (Model 1) had a higher c-statistic than the SVI (0.723 vs 0.708, p<0.001) in the testing set. Sequentially adding area-level SDoH (c-statistic 0.723) and business-level SDoH (c-statistics 0.723) to Model 1 had minimal improvement in model discrimination. Structural racism variables were associated with all-cause mortality for black participants but did not improve model discrimination compared with Model 1 (p=0.175). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, SDoH can improve mortality prediction over 10 years relative to a baseline model and have the potential to identify high-risk patients for further evaluation or intervention if validated externally.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Differences in demographics, risk factors, and clinical characteristics may contribute to variations in men and women in terms of the prevalence, clinical setting, and outcomes associated with worsening heart failure (WHF) events. We sought to describe sex-based differences in the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes associated with WHF events across clinical settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined adults diagnosed with HF from 2010 to 2019 within a large, integrated health care delivery system. Electronic health record data were accessed for hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits and observation stays, and outpatient encounters. WHF was identified using validated natural language processing algorithms and defined as ≥1 symptom, ≥2 objective findings (including ≥1 sign), and ≥1 change in HF-related therapy. Incidence rates and associated outcomes for WHF were compared across care setting by sex. We identified 1,122,368 unique clinical encounters with a diagnosis code for HF, with 124,479 meeting WHF criteria. These WHF encounters existed among 102,116 patients, of whom 48,543 (47.5%) were women and 53,573 (52.5%) were men. Women experiencing WHF were older and more likely to have HF with preserved ejection fraction compared with men. The clinical settings of WHF were similar among women and men: hospitalizations (36.8% vs 37.7%), ED visits or observation stays (11.8% vs 13.4%), and outpatient encounters (4.4% vs 4.9%). Women had lower odds of 30-day mortality after an index hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.83-0.93) or ED visit or observation stay (adjusted odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.75-0.98) for WHF. CONCLUSIONS: Women and men contribute similarly to WHF events across diverse clinical settings despite marked differences in age and left ventricular ejection fraction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with incident heart failure and incident amyloidosis and to assess the risk of CTS in pathogenic TTR genetic variant carriers. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included multiethnic US adults 18 years of age and older without prevalent heart failure and amyloidosis with available genotypic data from the All of Us Research Program. The primary outcomes were incident heart failure and incident amyloidosis. The association of incident heart failure and incident amyloidosis with CTS was assessed using multivariable adjusted Cox models accounting for age, sex, race and ethnicity, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, statin use, and smoking status. RESULTS: Of the 166,987 individuals included, the median age was 54 (38 to 66) years; 105,279 (63.0%) were female, and 92,780 (55.6%) were non-Hispanic White individuals; CTS was identified in 12,407 (7.4%) individuals. Compared with individuals without CTS, the adjusted hazard ratio for incident heart failure was 1.13 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.26) in individuals with CTS. The risk of amyloidosis was ∼3-fold higher (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.71 to 4.77) in individuals with CTS compared with those without CTS. Individuals carrying a pathogenic TTR variant had an approximately 40% higher risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.65) for development of CTS compared with noncarriers. CONCLUSION: Cardiac amyloidosis screening programs may use CTS as a sentinel event and use genetic testing to identify individuals at a higher risk of TTR amyloidosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of considering social determinants of health in health outcomes. Within this spectrum of determinants, social networks garnered attention as the pandemic highlighted the negative effects of social isolation in the context of social distancing measures. Postpandemic, examining the role social networks play in COVID-19 recovery can help guide patient care and shape future health policies. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between social networks and self-rated health change, as well as physical function, in patients recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing clinical data from 2 New York City hospitals and a 9-month follow-up survey of COVID-19 pneumonia survivors. We evaluated a composite Social Network Score from the 6-item Lubben Social Network Scale and its association with 2 outcomes: 1) self-rated health change and 2) physical function. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were included in this study. A 1-point increase in the Social Network Score was associated with greater odds of both same or improved self-rated health change (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12, P = .01), as well as unimpaired physical function (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.14, P < .01). CONCLUSION: This study emphasized the importance of social networks as a social determinant of health among patients recovering from COVID-19 hospitalization. Targeted interventions to enhance social networks may benefit not only COVID-19 patients but also individuals recovering from other acute illnesses.