RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has become the preferred treatment modality for nephrolithiasis. However, because of ongoing uncertainties regarding the optimal perioperative management, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up, as well as a lack of standardization for outcome reporting, consensus is needed to achieve more uniform clinical practice worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for RIRS on the basis of existing data and expert consensus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A protocol-driven, three-phase study was conducted by the European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) and the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU). The process included: (1) a nonsystematic review of the literature to define domains for discussion; (2) a two-round modified Delphi survey involving experts in this field; and (3) an additional group meeting and third-round survey involving 64 senior representative members to formulate the final conclusions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The results from each previous round were returned to the participants for re-evaluation of their decisions during the next round. The agreement threshold was set at 70%. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The panel included 209 participants who developed 29 consensus statements on the following topics of interest: (1) perioperative infection management; (2) perioperative antithrombotic therapy; (3) fundamentals of the operative technique; and (4) standardized outcome reporting. Although this consensus can be considered as a useful reference for more clinically oriented daily practice, we also acknowledge that a higher level of evidence from further clinical trials is needed. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus statements aim to guide and standardize clinical practice and research on RIRS and to recommend standardized outcome reporting. PATIENT SUMMARY: An international consensus on the best practice for minimally invasive surgery for kidney stones was organized and developed by two international societies. It is anticipated that this consensus will provide further guidance to urologists and may help to improve clinical outcomes for patients.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Urolitiasis , Urología , Humanos , Urología/métodos , Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Urolitiasis/cirugía , Consenso , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente InvasivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with spinal deformities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2008, eight patients (nine renal units) with spinal deformities underwent 10 PCNLs. Mean stone burden was 372 mm(2) (160-840 mm(2)). Preoperative investigation of the respiratory function, evaluation of anatomy by intravenous pyelography or CT spiral scan, and preoperative planning of the percutaneous access by ultrasonography (US) were performed in all patients. Patients were either in a prone (n = 5) or supine (n = 5) position during PCNL. US-guided fluoroscopic adjusted percutaneous puncture of the desired calix was performed in all the patients. RESULTS: There was a 40% complication rate related to the number of procedures, with 20% of patients needing blood transfusion and 10% experiencing major complications. Complete stone clearance per kidney after one PCNL was 55.5% (5/9 PCNLs), increasing to 66.6% (6/9 PCNLs) after a second PCNL. Four of nine (44.4%) renal units needed additional procedures after one PCNL (shockwave lithotripsy [SWL], retrograde intrarenal surgery [RIRS], combined simultaneous PCNL and RIRS). At the 3-month follow-up, the overall stone-free rate was 88.8% (eight renal units). CONCLUSION: PCNL in patients with spinal deformities is challenging. Accurate preoperative evaluation of the anatomy and respiratory function and a precise preoperative planning are mandatory. US-guided puncture of the collecting system permits avoiding visceral injury. Supine PCNL offers advantages in terms of patient comfort, protection of cardiorespiratory function, and the ability to perform a simultaneous combined ureteroscopic approach, although the prone position, if feasible with the patient's body habitus, may offer a wider space for percutaneous access. Combination therapy with either SWL or RIRS after PCNL improves stone-free rates.