Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 60(3): 103096, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33612449

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) secondary to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alloimmunization is a challenge in the treatment of hematology-oncologypatients and increases the risk of morbidity and mortality from bleeding events. Guidelines for treating PTR have not been clearly described in literature. We aim to describe the practice patterns for the management of PTR secondary to HLA alloimmunization, and to assess the mortality, thrombosis and bleeding-related clinical outcomes at 30 days from diagnosis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 51 cases of PTR secondary to HLA alloimmunization were analyzed. RESULTS: The majority of patients (98 %) had a diagnosis of hematological malignancy of which 88.2 % were undergoing active chemotherapy. Clinically relevant bleeding, by ISTH criteria, was observed in 33.3 %; hemorrhagic shock was diagnosed in 7%. The rate of bleeding-related mortality was estimated at 7.8 %. The use of antifibrinolytics and plasma products (including intravenous immunoglobulin) was more common in cases with major versus non-major bleeding. Grade A or B1U HLA matched products were available in less than half of cases. CONCLUSIONS: There is heterogeneity in the management of the bleeding risk and bleeding events during PTR, with antifibrinolytics more commonly used in patients who suffered severe bleeding. Grade A and B1U HLA-matched platelets are not always readily available, and HLA-typing and HLA-antibody testing are not always performed prior to PTR. Prospective randomized control trials may help to determine the safety and efficacy of antifibrinolytics and other supportive measures in the management of PTR.


Asunto(s)
Plaquetas/inmunología , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Instituciones Oncológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
2.
Blood Adv ; 4(8): 1690-1699, 2020 04 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32330243

RESUMEN

The value of event-free survival (EFS) as an end point in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) trials has been questioned. We hypothesized that rather than a surrogate for overall survival (OS), improvement in EFS may decrease the use of health care. In this retrospective study, we identified 400 patients with AML who were treated on first-line therapy trials and had OS between 2 and 36 months. We captured health care use from diagnosis until death or until the patient was censored at stem cell transplantation (SCT). We used correlation and regression analysis to determine the relation between health care use and EFS. Among patients with newly diagnosed AML, 35% had adverse-risk AML, 48% received intensive chemotherapy, and 28% received hypomethylating agents. The median EFS censored at SCT was 9.7 months. Longer EFS led to a significant decline in health care use regardless of OS. This held true for all observations, including overall health care use (r = -0.45), sum of clinic visits, emergency room visits, hospitalizations, consultations (r = -0.44), sum of invasive procedures, laboratory and imaging studies (r = -0.51), and blood product transfusions (r = -0.19). These correlations were stronger for patients who achieved a complete remission and held true across age, treatment, and disease risk subgroups. In patients with newly diagnosed AML, improvement in EFS correlates with a decrease in all health care use irrespective of OS duration.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Inducción de Remisión , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA