RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To facilitate endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), submucosal injection of lifting agents (LAs) is frequently used. ORISE™ gel, approved in 2018 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has been commonly utilized until recently. Its use grew rapidly due to its practical pre-filled syringe, prolonged lift effect, and ideal coloration. However, it has been noted to cause unexpected tissue reactions, described as "giant cell reaction" (GCR), which can obscure both macroscopic and microscopic views, potentially interfering with pathological evaluation. This study aims to describe the adverse effects of ORISE™ gel. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed pathology specimens from all consecutive patients who received ORISE™ injections for attempted polyp removal and subsequently underwent segmental colon resection at our center between 2019 and 2022. Descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were included, with 38% (n=17) being female and a median age of 66 years. The indications for surgery included adenocarcinoma in 14 patients (31%), suspected malignancy in 3 patients (7%) who had benign GCR-induced masses, and other indications in 28 patients, such as large polyps or recurrent polyps after initial endoscopic treatment. Surgical procedures included right hemicolectomy (44%), low anterior resection (13%), left colectomy (11%), sigmoidectomy (7%), and abdominoperineal resection (4%). Histologic evidence of prior LA injection was seen in 31 patients (69%), with 24 of these exhibiting GCR. At final pathology, no residual neoplasm was found in 9 patients (18%), while 14 patients (31%) had adenocarcinoma [T1 (7), T2 (3), T3 (3), T4 (1)]. CONCLUSION: ORISE™ Gel interacts with various tissue layers of the colon, frequently resulting in GCR. This reaction and the potential subsequent mass effect formation can impact decision-making in the management of complex colorectal lesions. Further study into the cause and consequences of LA tissue reactions is warranted.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Total neoadjuvant therapy in treatment of stage II-III rectal cancer involves administration of either induction or consolidation chemotherapy with chemoradiation before surgery. Total neoadjuvant therapy is associated with increased complete response rate, which is defined as the proportion of patients who either had pathological complete response after surgery or sustained clinical complete response at least for a year under surveillance. OBJECTIVE: To identify the predictors of complete response to total neoadjuvant therapy and compare different diagnostic tools in predicting complete response. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: A single tertiary-care center. PATIENTS: Stage II-III rectal cancer patients who were diagnosed between January 2015 and December 2021. INTERVENTION: Total neoadjuvant therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complete response rate, predictors of complete response, sensitivity and specificity of sigmoidoscopy and MRI in predicting complete response. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients (mean age 56 [±11.3] years, 47 [39.5%] female, 100 [84%] stage III rectal cancer were included. Median tumor size was 5.1 (4-6.5) cm, 63 (52.9%) were low rectal tumors. Twenty-one (17.6%) patients had extramural vascular invasion, 62 (52.1%) had elevated carcinoembryonic antigen at baseline. One hundred eight (90.8%) patients received consolidation chemotherapy. After total neoadjuvant therapy, 88 (73.9%) out of 119 patients underwent surgery, of whom 20 (22.7%) had pathological complete response. Thirty-one (26.1%) patients underwent watch-and-wait, of whom 24 (77.4%) had sustained clinical complete response. Overall complete response rate was 37%. Low rectal tumors (OR 2.6 [95% CI, 1.1-5.9], p = 0.02) and absence of EMVI [OR 5.4 (95% CI, 1.2-25.1), p = 0.01] were predictors of complete response. In predicting complete response, sigmoidoscopy was more sensitive (76.0% vs. 62.5%) and specific (72.5% vs. 69.2%) than MRI. The specificity further increased when 2 techniques were combined (82.5%). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Complete response rate after total neoadjuvant therapy was 37%. Low rectal tumors and absence of extramural vascular invasion were predictors of complete response. Sigmoidoscopy was better in predicting incomplete response, whereas combination (MRI and sigmoidoscopy) was better in predicting complete response.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions is typically performed with specialized and costly endoscopic knives, potentially limiting accessibility and increasing procedural cost. Alternatively, the tip of an endoscopic snare, which is inexpensive and universally available, has demonstrated safe and efficient use in gastric lesions but lacks sufficient data for use in colon lesions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess patient outcomes following endoscopic submucosal dissection of advanced colon lesions using the endoscopic snare tip. DESIGN: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at a single tertiary care center was conducted. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Adult patients with colon lesions that were not amenable to snare polypectomy were evaluated for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Snare tip resection was performed in select patients with lesions that lifted adequately after submucosal injection. Patients who underwent hybrid resections with endoscopic mucosal dissection were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: En bloc resection rates, operative time, perioperative complications, and short-term outcomes such as length of stay and lesion recurrence on follow-up colonoscopy were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients underwent snare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection, with a mean lesion size of 28.8 ± 9.84 mm. Most procedures were performed in the endoscopy suite (81.8%). The en bloc resection rate was 81.8% with an average procedure time of 37.1 ± 29.8 min. There were two perforations (1.70%), one of which was managed operatively. Recurrence occurred in 6 patients (7.89%) at the time of follow-up colonoscopy. LIMITATIONS: This study was retrospective, conducted by two skilled endoscopists with experience in endoscopic resection, and had short-term follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Snare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions demonstrates satisfactory short-term outcomes, suggesting its potential as a safe and accessible alternative to specialized knives, thereby possibly enhancing adoption of endoscopic resection and improving patient accessibility. See Video Abstract.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Submucosal dissection using the da Vinci SP® system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is an emerging approach for treating premalignant lesions in the colon and rectum. The endoluminal space is tight and small, and during the procedure, this tight space is accessed by the 40 mm GelPOINT® Path transanal platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA). Most of the trocar space is occupied by the 25 mm port of the da Vinci SP® system. There is limited space for an additional trocar, and the full mobility of this trocar is restricted; hence there is a need for an effective suction irrigator during these procedures. Although the da Vinci SP® system has four instrument capabilities, it does not have a suction irrigation instrument. To address this issue, we tested a Remotely Operated Suction Irrigation System (ROSI™) (VTI, Nashua, NH, USA) in three patients undergoing da Vinci SP® submucosal dissection. IMPACT OF INNOVATION: The impact of innovation is the evaluation of a flexible suction irrigator during endorobotic submucosal dissection (ERSD), addressing space constraints and enhancing surgical precision. TECHNOLOGY MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective observational study involving three patients who underwent ERSD, between February 2023 and May 2023. ROSI™ was used selectively for rectal lesions. PRELIMINARY RESULTS: The first patient was a 67-year-old male with a 30 mm tubulovillous adenoma found in the rectum at 4 cm. The second patient was a 49-year-old female, referred after a screening colonoscopy, with a 40 mm rectal mass 12 cm from the anal verge. A biopsy revealed a tubular adenoma without dysplasia. The last patient was a 66-year-old male with a 25 mm tubulovillous adenoma with a focal high-grade dysplasia at 10 cm. There was no evidence of invasive carcinoma or lymph node metastasis on MRI in any of the patients. The patients were placed in a modified lithotomy position, and the GelPOINT® Path was inserted. A silk suture was attached at the proximal end of ROSI™ to facilitate tubing manipulation. ROSI™ was freely passed into the endoluminal space through the gel using a surgical clamp. Any bleeding during the operation was aspirated and irrigated using ROSI™ with the assistance of bipolar forceps. All surgeries were completed without complications and the patients were discharged on the same day. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: ROSI™ is a flexible foot pedal-controlled suction irrigator that can facilitate da Vinci SP® submucosal dissection. The flexibility and controllability of ROSI in the surgeon's hand may qualify it as an essential tool for performing ERSD and possibly other TAMIS procedures.

RESUMEN

Up to 15% of colorectal polyps are amenable for conventional polypectomy. Advanced endoscopic resection techniques are introduced for the treatment of those polyps. They provide higher en bloc resection rates compared with conventional techniques, while helping patients to avoid the complications of surgery. Note that 20 mm is considered as the largest size of a polyp that can be resected by polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in an en bloc fashion. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended for polyps larger than 20 mm. Intramucosal carcinomas and carcinomas with limited submucosal invasion can also be resected with ESD. EMR is snare resection of a polyp following submucosal injection and elevation. ESD involves several steps such as marking, submucosal injection, incision, and dissection. Bleeding and perforation are the most common complications following advanced endoscopic procedures, which can be treated with coagulation and endoscopic clipping. En bloc resection rates range from 44.5 to 63% for EMR and from 87.9 to 96% for ESD. Recurrence rates following EMR and ESD are 7.4 to 17% and 0.9 to 2%, respectively. ESD is considered enough for the treatment of invasive carcinomas in the presence of submucosal invasion less than 1000 µm, absence of lymphovascular invasion, well-moderate histological differentiation, low-grade tumor budding, and negative resection margins.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a paradigm shift in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) from conventional neoadjuvant treatment to total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). Despite its growing acceptance, there are limited studies that have examined its effects on disease presentation. In addition, it is important to determine the factors that play a role in complete response (CR). Our previous data from 119 patients revealed that the CR rate was 37%, and low rectal tumors and the absence of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) were predictors of CR. Unfortunately, there continues to be a lack of data, and reliable markers are still needed to consistently identify the best respondents. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the factors associated with CR. Moreover, this study hypothesized that both predictive factors and the CR ratio might evolve over time because of the growing patient population. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who completed TNT for LARC at our tertiary care center between 2015 and 2022. The primary outcome was to determine the predictors of CR. The secondary outcomes were the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate. CR consists of patients who sustained clinical CR (cCR) for at least 12 months under watch and wait or had pathologic CR (pCR) after surgery. RESULTS: Of 339 patients with LARC, 208 (61.3%) successfully completed TNT. Among 208 patients, 57 (27.4%) achieved cCR, and 166 (80.0%) sustained cCR without tumor regrowth after 1 year. The remaining 151 patients (72.6%) underwent surgery, and 42 patients had pCR. The final CR rate was 42.3%. The median age of the patients was 56 years (IQR, 49-66). Moreover, 132 participants (63.5%) were male, whereas 76 participants (36.5%) were female. The median tumor size was 4.95 cm (IQR, 3.60-6.43), with most tumors in the low rectum (119 [57.2%]). Based on the MRI findings, the mesorectal facia (MRF) involvement rate was 25.0% (n = 52), and EMVI was observed in 43 patients (20.7%). Low rectal tumors, the absence of MRF involvement, and the absence of EMVI were predictors of CR. With a median follow-up of 24.7 months, 2-year DFS and OS were significantly higher among patients with CR than among patients with incomplete response (91.3% vs 71.0% [P < .01] and 98.8% vs 90.2% [P = .03], respectively). CONCLUSION: An increasing CR rate was observed in our updated dataset compared with that in our previous study. In addition to previously identified predictors, low tumor location, and the absence of EMVI, the absence of MRF involvement was determined as a predictor of CR. Our findings offer valuable insights into clinical practice and help clinicians set clear expectations when counseling patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically challenging resection technique for en bloc removal of dysplastic and early cancerous GI lesions. We conducted a single-arm retrospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new through-the-needle injection-capable electrosurgical knife used in upper and lower ESD procedures performed at 6 U.S. academic centers. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected on consecutive cases in which the new ESD knife was used. The primary efficacy endpoint was successful ESD (en bloc resection with negative margins). Secondary efficacy endpoints included en bloc resection rate, curative resection rate, median ESD time, and median dissection speed. The safety endpoint was device- or procedure-related serious adverse events. RESULTS: ESD procedures of 581 lesions in 579 patients were reviewed, including 187 (32.2%) upper GI and 394 (67.8%) lower GI lesions. Prior treatment was reported in 283 (48.9%) patients. Successful ESD was achieved in 477 (82.1% of 581) lesions-lower for patients with versus without submucosal fibrosis (73.6% vs 87.0%, respectively; P < .001) but similar for those with versus without previous treatment (81.7% vs 82.3%, respectively; P = .848). A total of 443 (76.2% of 581) lesions met criteria for curative resection. Median ESD time was 1.0 (range, 0.1-4.5) hour. Median dissection speed was 17.1 (interquartile range, 5.3-29.8) cm2/h. Related serious adverse events were reported in 15 (2.6%) patients, including delayed hemorrhage (1.9%), perforation (0.5%), or postpolypectomy syndrome (0.2%). CONCLUSION: A newly developed through-the-needle injection-capable ESD knife showed a good success rate and excellent safety at U.S. CENTERS: (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04580940.).

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Advanced endoscopic resection techniques are used to treat colorectal neoplasms that are not amenable to conventional colonoscopic resection. Literature regarding the predictors of the outcomes of advanced endoscopic resections, especially from a colorectal surgical unit, is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictors of short-term and long-term outcomes after advanced endoscopic resections. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTINGS: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent advanced endoscopic resections for colorectal neoplasms from November 2011 to August 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection, and combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictors of en bloc and R0 resection, bleeding, and perforation were determined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Cox regression models were used to determine the predictors of tumor recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 1213 colorectal lesions from 1047 patients were resected (median age 66 [interquartile range, 58-72] years, 484 women [46.2%], median BMI 28.6 [interquartile range, 24.8-32.6]). Most neoplasms were in the proximal colon (898; 74%). The median lesion size was 30 (interquartile range, 20-40; range, 0-120) mm. Nine hundred eleven lesions (75.1%) underwent previous interventions. The most common Paris and Kudo classifications were 0 to IIa flat elevation (444; 36.6%) and IIIs (301; 24.8%), respectively. En bloc and R0 resection rates were 56.6% and 54.3%, respectively. Smaller lesions, rectal location, and procedure type (endoscopic submucosal dissection) were associated with significantly higher en bloc and R0 resection rates. Bleeding and perforation rates were 5% and 6.6%, respectively. Increased age was a predictor for bleeding (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09; p < 0.0001). Lesion size was a predictor for perforation (OR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; p = 0.03). The tumor recurrence rate was 6.6%. En bloc (HR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.05-1.93; p = 0.02) and R0 resection (HR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11-2.06; p = 0.008) were associated with decreased recurrence risk. LIMITATIONS: Single-center, retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of advanced endoscopic resections can be predicted by patient-related and lesion-related characteristics. See Video Abstract . PREDICTORES DE LA RESECCION R, EN BLOQUE Y LAS COMPLICACIONES POR RESECCIONES ENDOSCPICAS AVANZADAS EN CASOS DE NEOPLASIA COLORRECTAL RESULTADOS DE PROCEDIMIENTOS: ANTECEDENTES:Las técnicas avanzadas de resección endoscópica se utilizan para el tratamiento de neoplasias colorrectales que no son susceptibles de resección colonoscópica convencional. La literatura sobre los predictores de los resultados de las resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas, especialmente en una unidad de cirugía colorrectal, es limitada.OBJETIVO:Determinar los predictores de resultados a corto y largo plazo después de resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas.DISEÑO:Serie de casos retrospectivos.LUGAR:Centro de tercer nivel de atención.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas por neoplasias colorrectales desde noviembre de 2011 hasta agosto de 2022.INTERVENCIÓNES:Resección endoscópica de la mucosa, disección endoscópica submucosa (ESD), ESD híbrida, cirugía laparoscópica endoscópica combinada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los predictores de resección en bloque y R0, sangrado y perforación se determinaron mediante modelos de regresión logística univariables y multivariables. Se utilizaron modelos de regresión de Cox para determinar los predictores de recurrencia del tumor.RESULTADOS:Se resecaron 1.213 lesiones colorrectales en 1.047 pacientes [edad media 66 (58-72) años, 484 (46,2%) mujeres, índice de masa corporal medio 28,6 (24,8-32,6) kg/m 2 ]. La mayoría de las neoplasias se encontraban en el colon proximal (898, 74%). El tamaño medio de la lesión fue de 30mm (RIC: 20-40, rango: 0-120). 911 (75,1%) lesiones tenían intervenciones previas. Las clasificaciones de París y Kudo más comunes fueron 0-IIa elevación plana (444, 36,6%) y III (301, 24,8%), respectivamente. Las tasas de resección en bloque y R0 fueron del 56,6% y 54,3%, respectivamente. Las lesiones más pequeñas, la ubicación rectal y el tipo de procedimiento (ESD) se asociaron con tasas de resección en bloque y R0 significativamente más altas. Las tasas de sangrado y perforación fueron del 5% y 6,6%, respectivamente. La edad avanzada [1,06 (1,03-1,09), p < 0,0001] fue un predictor de sangrado. El tamaño de la lesión [1,02 (1,00-1,03), p = 0,03] fue un predictor de perforación. La tasa de recurrencia del tumor fue del 6,6%. En bloque [HR 1,41 (IC 95% 1,05-1,93), p = 0,02] y la resección R0 [HR 1,49 (IC 95% 1,11-2,06), p = 0,008] se asociaron con un menor riesgo de recurrencia.LIMITACIONES:Estudio unicéntrico, retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Los resultados de las resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas pueden predecirse según las características del paciente y de la lesión. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is a matter of controversy. Surgical practices in Korea and Japan have accepted this approach and are widely utilized; however, it is not routinely incorporated in the practice of countries in the Western hemisphere. This review will examine the role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medically refractory ulcerative colitis necessitates surgical intervention, with total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy being a definitive treatment. The comparison between single-port and multiport laparoscopic surgery outcomes remains underexplored. OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcomes of single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis comparing single-port to multiport surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis from 2010 to 2020. Patients were propensity score-matched 3:1 (multiport to single-port) on baseline characteristics. SETTINGS: Single-center academic hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 756 patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis who underwent multiport vs single-port total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy from 2010 to 2020 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Binary outcomes were compared using a multivariable logistic regression model, and a subset analysis was conducted for postoperative stump leak based on stump implantation during surgery. These metrics were compared between the single-port and multiport groups to assess the differences in surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The multiport and single-port groups included 642 and 114 patients, respectively. The matched cohort included 342 multiports and 114 single ports. We observed a statistically significant difference in mean operation time, with the single-port procedure taking 43 minutes less than the multiport laparoscopy. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative stump leaks, postoperative ileus, stoma site complications, postoperative readmission within 30 days, postoperative reoperation within 30 days, and subsequent IPAA surgery. In the subset analysis, stump implantation was associated with a higher risk of stump leak in the multiport group. The single-port group had a shorter hospital stay. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature and being conducted at a single center. CONCLUSION: Single-incision laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy in the treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis is a safe, effective, and efficient approach. In our cohort, single-incision laparoscopy has had shorter operation times and better overall length of stay compared with the multiport approach. Taking into account a less invasive approach, decreased abdominal trauma, and faster recovery, single-port surgery is a viable alternative to multiport surgery. See Video Abstract . UN ANLISIS EMPAREJADO POR PUNTUACIN DE PROPENSIN DE LA COLECTOMA ABDOMINAL TOTAL LAPAROSCPICA CON PUERTO NICO VERSUS PUERTO MLTIPLE CON ILEOSTOMA TERMINAL PARA LA COLITIS ULCEROSA MDICAMENTE REFRACTARIA: ANTECEDENTES:La colitis ulcerosa (CU) médicamente refractaria requiere una intervención quirúrgica, siendo la colectomía abdominal total con ileostomía terminal un tratamiento definitivo. La comparación entre los resultados de la cirugía laparoscópica con puerto único y con puerto múltiple aún no se ha explorado lo suficiente.OBJETIVO:Comparar los resultados quirúrgicos de la cirugía laparoscópica con puerto único versus con puerto múltiple en pacientes sometidos a colectomía abdominal total con ileostomía terminal para CU médicamente refractaria.DISEÑO:Un análisis retrospectivo que comparó la cirugía de puerto único con la de puerto múltiple en pacientes con CU de 2010 a 2020. Los pacientes fueron emparejados por puntuación de propensión 3:1 (puerto múltiple a puerto único) según las características iniciales.AJUSTES:Hospital académico unicentrico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados binarios se compararon utilizando un modelo de regresión logística multivariable y se realizó un análisis de subconjunto para la fuga postoperatoria del muñón basado en la implantación del muñón durante la cirugía. Estas métricas se compararon entre los grupos de puerto único y de puerto múltiple para evaluar las diferencias en los resultados quirúrgicos.RESULTADOS:Los grupos de puerto único y multipuerto incluyeron 642 y 114 pacientes, respectivamente. La cohorte emparejada incluyó 342 puertos múltiples y 114 puertos únicos. Observamos una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en el tiempo medio de operación, ya que el procedimiento de puerto único duró 43 minutos menos que la laparoscopia de puerto múltiple. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los dos grupos en las fugas del muñón posoperatorio, el íleo posoperatorio, las complicaciones del sitio del estoma, el reingreso posoperatorio dentro de los 30 días, la reoperación posoperatoria dentro de los 30 días y la cirugía IPAA posterior. En el análisis de subconjunto, la implantación del muñón se asoció con un mayor riesgo de fuga del muñón en el grupo multipuerto. El grupo de puerto único tuvo una estancia hospitalaria más corta.LIMITACIONES:Carácter retrospectivo, realizándose en un único centro.CONCLUSIÓN:La colectomía abdominal total laparoscópica de incisión única en el tratamiento de la colitis ulcerosa mucosa es un enfoque seguro, eficaz y eficiente. En nuestra cohorte, en comparación con el abordaje multipuerto, la laparoscopia de incisión única ha mostrado tiempos de operación más cortos y una mejor duración total de la estancia hospitalaria. Teniendo en cuenta un enfoque menos invasivo, un menor traumatismo abdominal y una recuperación más rápida, la cirugía con puerto único es una alternativa viable a la cirugía con puertos múltiples. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Limited data exist regarding the surgical outcomes of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO), commonly referred to as Ogilvie syndrome, in modern clinical practice. The prevailing belief is that surgery should be avoided due to previously reported high mortality rates. We aimed to describe the surgical results of ACPO treated within our institution. METHODS: Our prospectively maintained colorectal surgery registry was queried for patients diagnosed with ACPO, who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2022. Postoperative complications were graded according to Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients who underwent surgery for ACPO were identified. Overall, nonoperative therapy was initially administered to 21 patients (65.6%). The surgeries performed included total abdominal colectomy (15, 43.1%), ascending colectomy with end ileostomy (8, 25%), transverse colostomy (5, 15.6%), ileostomy and transverse colostomy (3, 9.4%), and Hartmann's operation (1, 3.1%). Severe postoperative complications (CD grade 3 or 4) occurred in five patients (15.6%). No recurrence of ACPO was observed and no patient required reoperation. The average postoperative length of stay was 14.5 days, 30-day mortality was 6.3% (n = 2), and 90-day mortality was 15.6% (n = 5) due to complications of underlying comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment was effective for patients with ACPO refractory to medical therapy or presenting with acute complications. Although postoperative complications were frequent, both the 30- and 90-day mortality rates were lower than previously documented in the literature. Further investigations are warranted to determine the optimal surgical strategy, which may involve total or segmental colectomy, or diversion alone without resection.

Asunto(s)