RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Folliculocentric basaloid proliferation (FBP) is a benign and reactive proliferation which can histopathologically mimic basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). The incidental presence of FBP during the excision of a BCC can occasionally lead to excessive tissue removal. One distinguishing feature of BCCs is that they invade the stroma, whereas FBPs generally do not. METHODS: Matrilin-2 is an extracellular matrix protein associated with tumor invasion, and we compared the expression of matrilin-2 in peritumoral cells of BCC and FBP. RESULTS: We found increased matrilin-2 expression within the peritumoral stroma of 41 of 42 BCCs (97.7%), with strong expression in all (100%) cases of infiltrative subtypes and in 21 of 25 (84%) nodular subtypes of BCC. We found no expression of peritumoral matrilin-2 in any of the seven cases of FBP. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that immunolabeling with the matrilin-2 antibody may help distinguish BCCs from FBPs.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular , Proteínas Matrilinas , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Proliferación Celular , Humanos , Proteínas Matrilinas/análisis , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Coloración y EtiquetadoRESUMEN
Acute wounds created by dermatologists following the removal of nonmelanoma skin cancers are closed either by primary or secondary intention, and the best cosmetic outcome is preferentially desired. One parameter that determines the overall cosmesis of the healed wound is its vascularity. Vascular tone results from a complex interplay of a variety of chemokines in the body and their interaction with receptors located on endothelial cell surfaces. In this study, our aim was to determine if topical timolol could improve the overall cosmesis of acute surgical wounds. We determined that patients who treated their acute surgical wounds with topical timolol had improved cosmesis compared to control.
Asunto(s)
Cicatriz/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Herida Quirúrgica , Timolol/administración & dosificación , Administración Cutánea , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cosméticos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de HeridasAsunto(s)
Nariz/cirugía , Rinoplastia/métodos , Trasplante de Piel/métodos , Femenino , Frente/cirugía , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the preliminary safety and efficacy of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, for atopic dermatitis. DESIGN: This investigator-initiated, open-label pilot study evaluated 2 doses of apremilast in patients with atopic dermatitis. Differential gene analysis was performed from peripheral whole blood using data before and after treatment. SETTING: University-based dermatology clinical research unit. PATIENTS: Sixteen adult patients with atopic dermatitis. INTERVENTION: A specific phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, apremilast. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included the differences in pruritus, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores between the baseline visit and end-ofstudy visit for each cohort. RESULTS: The group receiving apremilast, 20 mg twice daily, displayed a significant reduction from baseline of pruritus (P=.02) and the DLQI (P=.003) at 3 months. The group receiving apremilast, 30 mg twice daily, displayed a significant reduction of the EASI (P=.008) and the DLQI (P=.01) at 3 months. At 6 months, there was a significant reduction of the EASI (P=.002), the visual analog scale (P=.03), and the DLQI (P=.03). Gene ontologic analyses comparing baseline with samples during treatment revealed alterations in immune response pathways, especially those related to cyclic adenosine monophosphatemediated signaling. CONCLUSIONS: These results support further development of apremilast for treatment of atopic dermatitis. Larger randomized controlled studies are needed to more adequately evaluate both safety and efficacy. Limitations include the small sample size and absence of a control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01393158.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4/efectos adversos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Proteína de Unión a Elemento de Respuesta al AMP Cíclico/sangre , Proteína de Unión a Elemento de Respuesta al AMP Cíclico/efectos de los fármacos , Proteína de Unión a Elemento de Respuesta al AMP Cíclico/genética , Dermatitis Atópica/sangre , Dermatitis Atópica/genética , Dermatitis Atópica/inmunología , Femenino , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Interleucina-12/sangre , Interleucina-12/genética , Macrófagos/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Náusea/etiología , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Proyectos Piloto , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Transducción de Señal/genética , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversosRESUMEN
To properly evaluate therapies for cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM), it is essential to administer an outcome instrument that is reliable, valid, and responsive to clinical change, particularly when measuring disease activity. The purpose of this study was to compare two skin severity DM outcome measures, the Cutaneous Disease and Activity Severity Index (CDASI) and the Cutaneous Assessment Tool-Binary Method (CAT-BM), with the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) as the "gold standard". Ten dermatologists evaluated 14 patients with DM using the CDASI, CAT-BM, and PGA scales. Inter- and intra-rater reliability, validity, responsiveness, and completion time were compared for each outcome instrument. Responsiveness was assessed from a different study population, where one physician evaluated 35 patients with 110 visits. The CDASI was found to have a higher inter- and intra-rater reliability. Regarding construct validity, both the CDASI and the CAT-BM were significant predictors of the PGA scales. The CDASI had the best responsiveness among the three outcome instruments examined. The CDASI had a statistically longer completion time than the CAT-BM by about 1.5 minutes. The small patient population may limit the external validity of the findings observed. The CDASI is a better clinical tool to assess skin severity in DM.
Asunto(s)
Dermatomiositis/diagnóstico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence of self-reported photosensitivity (PS) and its effects on quality of life in a US cutaneous lupus population. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the prevalence of self-reported PS among a cutaneous lupus population and to examine its impact on quality of life. METHODS: A total of 169 patients with lupus were interviewed about PS symptoms and completed the modified Skindex-29+3, a quality-of-life survey. A complete skin examination was conducted and the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index was completed. RESULTS: In all, 68% of patients reported some symptoms of PS. The PS group (those who reported a history of and current PS) scored worse on PS-related items of the modified Skindex-29+3 and had higher cutaneous disease activity as determined by the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index. Patients with PS had worse symptoms and emotions and experienced significant functional impairments compared with patients who had cutaneous lupus without PS. LIMITATIONS: This study was done at a single referral center. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported PS is very common among patients with cutaneous lupus and is associated with significant impairments related to symptoms, emotions, and daily functioning.
Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Cutáneo/complicaciones , Trastornos por Fotosensibilidad/etiología , Autoinforme , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Cutáneo/epidemiología , Masculino , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Trastornos por Fotosensibilidad/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Rayos Ultravioleta/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of topical medications for acne vulgaris is often limited by their irritant properties. Newer combination preparations are available and offer convenience, but irritant potential may still be a hindrance, perhaps more so with the combination of 2 agents. Few studies have compared these formulations directly for tolerability. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the tolerability of 2 combination topical acne products, clindamycin 1.2%-tretinoin 0.025% (CLIN/RA) gel and benzoyl peroxide 2.5%-adapalene 0.1% (BPO/ADA) gel. METHODS: CLIN/RA and BPO/ADA were applied daily to opposite sides of a subject's face for 21 days in a double-blinded fashion. Investigators' Global Assessments and study subject self-assessments of burning/stinging, itching, erythema, and dryness/scaling were collected. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was also measured as an objective measure of skin irritation. A mixed model analysis and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used to compare outcomes for both acne formulations. RESULTS: CLIN/RA produced significantly less burning/stinging than BPO/ADA (P<.001) as well as significantly less pruritus than BPO/ ADA (P<.001). BPO/ADA caused significantly more TEWL than CLIN/RA (P=.005). There was no significant difference in the amount of erythema or the amount of dryness/scaling caused by either formulation. CONCLUSION: CLIN/RA produced significantly less skin irritancy and TEWL than BPO/ADA.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar/complicaciones , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Peróxido de Benzoílo/efectos adversos , Clindamicina/efectos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Irritantes , Queratolíticos/efectos adversos , Naftalenos/efectos adversos , Piel/patología , Tretinoina/efectos adversos , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Acné Vulgar/patología , Adapaleno , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Peróxido de Benzoílo/uso terapéutico , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Eritema/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Humanos , Queratolíticos/uso terapéutico , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Naftalenos/uso terapéutico , Prurito/inducido químicamente , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Tretinoina/uso terapéutico , Pérdida Insensible de Agua , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QoL) for patients with inflammatory skin disease can be significant, but has been evaluated in just one study in dermatomyositis (DM). OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the relationship between the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Area (CDASI) and Severity Index, a DM-specific cutaneous severity instrument, and various QoL study instruments and to determine the impact of DM on QoL. METHODS: Skin-specific QoL instruments, the Skindex and the Dermatology Life Quality Index, and global medical QoL instruments, the Short Form 36 and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, were used. Pruritus was evaluated by a visual analog scale and a 0-to-10 scale in DM and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) populations, respectively. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the CDASI and all skin-specific QoL scores (lowest P = .0377). Using the Short Form 36, DM population was found to have significantly worse QoL scores than the general population with the exception of bodily pain (all subscore P values < .01). Furthermore, DM had a significantly lower vitality score, representing energy level, compared with CLE, hypertension, diabetes, and recent myocardial infarction scores (lowest P = .003). There was a significantly lower mental health score, representing overall mood, to all compared diseases except CLE and clinical depression (P values < .01 when significant). We found that DM produces more pruritus than CLE (P < .0001). LIMITATIONS: A larger patient population needs to be studied to further assess QoL in patients with DM. CONCLUSION: We conclude that DM has a large impact on QoL, even when compared with other diseases, and that DM skin disease activity correlates with a poorer QoL.
Asunto(s)
Dermatomiositis , Calidad de Vida , Dermatomiositis/complicaciones , Dermatomiositis/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Approximately 349 million individuals worldwide are actively infected with syphilis. The incidence of syphilis in North America and Europe is low but has been rising in recent years. The rate of concomitant infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and syphilis also has been increasing. Concomitant infection with HIV can cause syphilis to have atypical characteristics. These atypical findings can involve the skin as well as organs that rarely are affected in HIV-negative individuals such as the eyes. We present a case of syphilis causing palmoplantar keratoderma and ocular disease in a patient with HIV infection, and discuss the differences in diagnosis and treatment of patients with both diseases.