RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The true influence of body mass index on the outcome of esophageal cancer surgery is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the relation between preoperative body mass index and clinical and oncological outcomes of esophagectomy for cancer in a patient cohort from the Dutch nationwide audit. METHODS: All patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer between January 2011 and 2016 were identified in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit. Patients were divided into 4 body mass index categories (<18.5 kg/m2 underweight, 18.5 to 25 kg/m2 normal weight, 25 to 30 kg/m2 overweight, and >30 kg/m2 obese) and were compared for clinical and oncological outcomes with the use of propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: Of the patients, 2,598 were included (underweight = 70, normal weight = 1,097, overweight = 1,007, and obese = 424). Before propensity score-matched analysis, underweight patients had a significantly longer hospital stay, more chyle leakage, underwent more re-operations, and had a higher in-hospital/30-day mortality compared to the other weight groups. After propensity score-matched analysis, 560 patients were included: 62 were underweight, 180 were normal weight, 165 were overweight, and 153 were obese. Length of hospital stay, chyle leakage, necrosis of the reconstruction, re-interventions, re-operations, re-admittance to the intensive care unit/medium care unit, and in-hospital/30-day mortality were seen most in the underweight group. No differences were seen in intraoperative complications and oncological outcomes. CONCLUSION: Underweight patients are more prone for the development of postoperative complications after esophagectomy. Physicians and dieticians should be aware of the impact of underweight on postoperative outcome. Future studies should focus on nutritional status and the effect of preoperative correction of body weight.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Índice de Masa Corporal , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Delgadez/complicacionesRESUMEN
Gastrointestinal perforation due to infection, including disseminated histoplasmosis, is a rare cause of the surgical acute abdomen, especially in an apparently healthy patient. We describe a rare case of gastrointestinal histoplasmosis-induced small intestine perforation as the first manifestation of acquired immune deficiency syndrome in a healthy patient. Remarkably, the disease mimicked peritonitis carcinomatosis during explorative laparoscopy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic hernias after esophagectomy are mostly asymptomatic. However, they can also manifest with severe complications and be associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aims of this study were to assess the incidence, predictive factors, and preferred treatment of symptomatic diaphragmatic hernias and to evaluate the role of prophylactic cruroplasty in patients after esophagectomy for carcinomas of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. METHODS: A prospective database was used to retrospectively analyze consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2005 and December 2015. RESULTS: A symptomatic diaphragmatic hernia was diagnosed in 21 (2.5%) of 851 included patients; 15 (4.3%) after 345 minimally invasive esophagectomies and 6 (1.2%) after 506 open esophagectomies (p = 0.004). Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis procedures had the highest incidence (9.4%; p = 0.002) as compared with all other procedures. Prophylactic cruroplasty did not decrease the incidence of symptomatic diaphragmatic hernias (2.1% vs 2.7%; p = 0.608). Surgical treatment consisted of cruroplasty, with reinforcement of Prolene pledgets (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) in 11 patients. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade >IIIb) occurred in 3 patients, all after open repair (n = 9). Recurrences were found in 4 patients (19.0%), three after laparoscopic repair and one after open repair. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of symptomatic diaphragmatic hernia after esophagectomy was 2.5%, with the highest incidence after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (9.4%) as compared with other procedures. Although prophylactic cruroplasty is now the standard of care in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy, a significant lower hernia rate was not found in this study.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Hernia Hiatal/epidemiología , Hernia Hiatal/etiología , Laparoscopía/métodos , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Esofagectomía/métodos , Unión Esofagogástrica/cirugía , Femenino , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare rectal resection (RR) with colonic resection on sexual, urinary and bowel function and quality of life in both short-term and long-term. METHODS: Eighty-three patients who underwent RR were compared to 53 patients who underwent a colonic resection leaving the rectum in situ (RIS). A questionnaire assessing sexual, urinary and bowel functioning with a quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) was sent to all participants preoperatively, 3 and 12 months postoperatively and approximately 8 years after the onset of the study. RESULTS: Short-term dysfunction included diminished sexual activity in female RR patients at 3 months and significantly more erectile dysfunction in RR patients 1 year postoperatively. Long-term dysfunction included more frequent and more severe erectile dysfunction in RR patients compared to RIS patients. These short-term and long-term outcomes did not influence overall quality of life. The incidence of urinary dysfunction was comparable between both groups. Bowel functioning was significantly better in the RIS group compared to the RR group 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent RR experienced up to 1 year postoperatively more sexual and bowel function problems than RIS patients. However, short-term and long-term dysfunction did not influence overall quality of life. Erectile dysfunction in male RR patients persisted in time, whereas other aspects of sexual, urinary and bowel function after RR and colonic resection are similar after a median follow-up of 8.5 years.