RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Report the prevalence and severity of the most common allergic diseases in children living in Monterrey, México. METHODS: Cross-sectional multi-center survey on the most common allergic diseases, completed by parents of 6-7-year-old children and by 13-14- year-old adolescents in the Monterrey metropolitan area, between January 2018 and December 2019. RESULTS: A total of 3,044 questionnaires were eligible for the analysis. Among children between 6-7 years old, 30.2% (n = 143/473) presented wheezing at any time in their life; with a higher prevalence in the male population. In the adolescent group, 26.4% reported having experienced wheezing at some point in their life, with a slight predominance in the female group (54.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Knowing the prevalence of allergic diseases in our population gives us tools to generate strategies that allow us to provide the best quality healthcare to our patients.
OBJETIVO: Reportar la prevalencia y gravedad de las enfermedades alérgicas más comunes en niños residentes en Monterrey, México. MÉTODOS: Encuesta multicéntrica transversal, acerca de las enfermedades alérgicas más comunes, completada por padres de niños de 6 aa 7 años y por adolescentes de 13 a 14 años del área metropolitana de Monterrey, entre enero de 2018 y diciembre de 2019. RESULTADOS: Un total de 3044 cuestionarios fueron elegibles para el análisis. Entre los niños de 6-7 años, 30.2% (n = 143/473) manifestaron sibilancias en algún momento de su vida; con mayor prevalencia en la población masculina. En el grupo de adolescentes el 26.4% refirió haber tenido sibilancias alguna vez en su vida, con un ligero predominio en el grupo femenino (54.9%). CONCLUSIONES: Conocer la prevalencia de las enfermedades alérgicas en la población brinda herramientas para generar estrategias para la mejor calidad asistencial en los pacientes.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Humanos , México/epidemiología , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Adolescente , Prevalencia , Asma/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Introduction: Sick building syndrome (SBS) refers to non-specific complaints, including upper-respiratory irritative symptoms, headaches, fatigue, and rash, which are usually associated with a particular building by their temporal pattern of occurrence and clustering among inhabitants or colleagues. The aim of the study was to determine the association between the clinical manifestations of sick building syndrome with outdoor pollutants and airborne pollen. Methods: It was a descriptive and prospective observational study conducted from November 2021 to April 2022. It included subjects over 18 years old who completed an online survey on sick building syndrome (general symptoms, nasal, ocular, oropharyngeal, and skin symptoms) presented at home, housing information and personal history. The APS-330 from Pollen Sense ® was used to obtain data on pollen in the air and the local pollution monitoring system (SIMA) to obtain information regarding pollutants. For statistical analysis, SPSS version 16 was used. Results: A total of 402 surveys were included; 91% of the subjects reported having at least 1 symptom. Females presented more general symptoms (fatigue and headache) than males. Subjects with a personal history of atopy showed a higher prevalence of practically all symptoms. Airborne pollen exposure was positively associated with mucosal symptoms in eyes and nose. Outdoor fungi spore exposure was positively associated with oculo-nasal and cutaneous symptoms in the scalp. Conclusion: This study found significant associations with female gender and a history of atopy, which suggests a higher risk for these subjects. Despite the limitations of the study, we can conclude that there is an association between the clinical manifestations of sick building syndrome with indoor and outdoor pollution.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In prostate cancer, androgens are key in the growth of both normal prostate and cancer cells. Abiraterone acetate inhibits CYP17, an important target in prostate cancer given its central role in the production of adrenal and tumor-derived androgens. Although abiraterone is generally well tolerated, common adverse effects such as hypertension, hypokalemia, and hepatotoxicity have been reported. CLINICAL CASE: We present the case of an 83-year-old Mexican man with high-volume EC IV prostate cancer resistant to castration, orchiectomy, and bone, liver, and lung metastases. First-line treatment with the CHAARTED scheme was indicated, by patient decision refuse chemotherapy treatment. On the fourth day of starting treatment, he developed pruritic erythematous macular skin lesions and urticaria on the posterior chest that resolved spontaneously. A generalized erythematous and pruritic maculopapular rash appeared 12 days after starting abiraterone, for which she was referred to allergies. MANAGEMENT AND RESULTS: An oral provocation test was performed for two days, presenting localized macular lesions eight hours after the administration of abiraterone. An oral desensitization protocol was carried out for ten days in which no hypersensitivity reactions were observed, thus achieving the successful administration of abiraterone.
Asunto(s)
Androstenos , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Androstenos/uso terapéutico , Androstenos/efectos adversos , Androstenos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Background: Asthma and allergic diseases have increased in recent decades and are more common in industrialized countries. Industrial areas with a considerably high number of inhabitants and vehicles can favor the presence of serious air pollution and therefore the appearance and exacerbation of respiratory allergy symptoms. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between exposure to environmental pollutants with exacerbation of respiratory allergy. Methods: A total of 240 subjects above 6 years old who lived in the metropolitan area of Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, with diagnosis of allergic rhinitis and/or asthma, were included. The subject's address was registered in the database and the rhinitis control assessment test (RCAT) and the asthma control test (ACT) were applied. Environmental data were obtained from the Environmental Monitoring System (SIMA) of Nuevo León. Geolocation of industries and avenues in proximity of subject's addresses and SIMA stations were obtained through geographic information systems using ArcGis software. Results: The relation between pollutants and subjects' RCAT, ACT, and spirometry results in the 14 stations was established. PM10 and forced vital capacity (FVC) had an r = 0.074 with p = 0.005, PM10 and absolute FEV1/FVC ratio presented an r = -0.102 with a p = 0.000; The distance found to be associated with a worsening of respiratory symptoms was living 165 m from a main road or 241 m from an industrial establishment. Conclusions: Exposure to pollutants present in the environment are factors associated with increased symptoms in subjects with respiratory allergies.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to assess the efficacy of doxofylline as an ICS-sparing agent in the treatment of Mexican children with asthma. METHODS: 10-week, open-label, crossover, pilot study, we examined the steroid-sparing effect of doxofylline in Mexican children with asthma. Patients aged 6-16 years treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for at least 8 wk before enrollment were divided randomly into two groups at the baseline visit. Group A (n = 31) received doxofylline (18 mg/kg/day) plus standard-dose budesonide (D + SDB) for the first 4-week period followed by doxofylline plus reduced-dose budesonide (D + RDB) for the second 4-week period. Group B (n = 30) received D + RDB followed by D + SDB. Clinical outcomes assessed included lung function (forced expiratory volume; in 1 s, FEV1), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), asthma control, number of exacerbations and use of rescue medication (salbutamol). RESULTS: It was shown that combined use of doxofylline and ICS may allow children with asthma to reduce their daily dose of ICS while maintaining lung function and improving asthma control (p = 0.008). There were few asthma exacerbations and only one patient required treatment with systemic corticosteroids. Rescue medication use decreased significantly in patients receiving D + SDB during the first 4-week period. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that doxofylline may be a steroid-sparing treatment in asthma, but longer-term, controlled studies are needed to confirm these observations.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Budesonida , Estudios Cruzados , Quimioterapia Combinada , Teofilina , Teofilina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Niño , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , México , Teofilina/uso terapéutico , Teofilina/administración & dosificación , Proyectos Piloto , Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Budesonida/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Objective: To compare whether adolescents who are exposed to truck smoke have a higher prevalence of asthma symptomatology versus those who are not exposed. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive, and comparative study. Adolescents aged 13 and 14 years were included and completed a self-report questionnaire. Subjects were selected following the same methodology as in ISAAC phase III. They underwent an epidemiological survey for the presence of symptoms. Ex- posure to truck smoke was defined as passing trucks most of the day as perceived by the patient. The distribution was assessed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Comparisons with Chi-square or Student's t-test, as appropriate. A value of p³0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 492 patients were included. The demographic variables can be seen in Table 1. When performing the association between the groups of ad- olescents with asthma exposed to truck smoke, a significant difference was found in the prevalence of respiratory symptomatology and asthma (26.0% vs 9.6%, p=0.000) (Table 1). Conclusions: Adolescent patients with asthma who are exposed to truck smoke demonstrated a significant difference in the presence of respiratory symptom- atology and asthma compared to patients without exposure.
Objetivo: Comparar si los adolescentes que están expuestos a humo de camiones tienen mayor prevalencia de sintomatología de asma contra quienes no están expuestos. Métodos: Estudio transversal, descriptivo y comparativo. Se incluyeron adolescentes de 13 y 14 años de edad quienes completaron un cuestionario autoinfor- mado. Los sujetos se seleccionaron siguiendo la misma metodología que en la fase III de ISAAC. Se les realizó una encuesta epidemiológica para la presencia de síntomas. Exposición al humo de camiones se definió como el paso de camiones la mayoría del día a percepción del paciente. La distribución fue evaluada con la prueba de Kolmogórov-Smirnov. Comparaciones con prueba de Chi-cuadrada o T de Student, según corresponda. Un valor de p £ 0.05 fue considerado estadísticamente significativo. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 492 pacientes. Las variables demográficas se pueden observar en la Tabla 1. Al realizar la asociación entre los grupos de adolescentes con asma que se encuentran expuestos a humo de camiones se encontró una diferencia significativa en la prevalencia de sintomatología respira- toria y asma (26.0% vs 9.6%, p = 0.000). Conclusiones: Los pacientes adolescentes con asma que se encuentran expuestos al humo de camiones demostraron tener diferencia significativa en la presencia de sintomatología respiratoria y asma en comparación con los pacientes sin exposición.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Autoanticuerpos , Adolescente , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , México , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent years, a new type of immediate hypersensitivity reaction known as cytokine release began to emerge, and within this phenotype of reactions, interleukin-6 is the most frequently associated with the presence during drug administration. Chemotherapeutic agents (QT) and monoclonal antibodies. OBJECTIVE: Determine interleukin-6 levels in hypersensitivity reactions to QT and monoclonal antibodies. METHODS: Observational and prospective study that was carried out from March 1, 2021 to March 1, 2022 in a university hospital in northeastern Mexico. Symptoms, severity, interleukin-6 levels, and skin tests of hypersensitivity reaction were evaluated at QT and monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients with oncological disease were included, the most frequent being ovarian cancer. Symptoms as initial hypersensitivity reaction were neuromuscular in taxanes and cutaneous in Platinums.41.5% presented elevation of interleukin-6, and it was found more frequently in presence of metastases. Positive skin tests were found more frequently in the carboplatin and doxorubicin groups. The most frequently presented phenotype was type I in paclitaxel, carboplatin, and doxorubicin, and mixed-reaction (type I and cytokine release) in oxaliplatin. CONCLUSION: With the increasing prevalence of hypersensitivity reactions to biologic and antineoplastic therapies, interleukin-6 should be recognized as a biomarker in immediate hypersensitivity reactions to QT and monoclonal antibodies.
RESUMEN
Background: Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) are important tools to establish the effects of a given intervention. Investigators should focus on outcomes that patients perceive: patient-important outcomes (PIOs), clinical endpoints that patients value directly and reflect how they feel, function, or survive. However, it is easier to consider surrogated outcomes to reduce costs and achieve better-looking results. The problem with these outcomes is that they indirectly measure PIOs, which might not correlate linearly or translate reliably into a positive PIO. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE for atopic disease RCTs rated among the top 10 allergic diseases and general internal medicine journals from the last 10 years. Two independent reviewers worked in duplicate and independently to collect data from all eligible articles. We gathered information regarding the type of study, title, author information, journal, intervention type, atopic disease, and primary and secondary outcomes. We assessed the outcomes investigators used in RCTs of atopic diseases and asthma. Results: This quantitative analysis included n = 135 randomized clinical trials. The most studied atopic disease during the period selected was asthma (n = 69), followed by allergic rhinitis (n = 51). When divided by atopic disease, primary outcomes in RCTs valuing allergic rhinitis had the most significant proportion of PIOs (76.7), asthma surrogated outcomes (38), and asthma/allergic rhinitis laboratory outcomes (42.9). PIOs in allergic rhinitis trials had the most significant proportion of PIOs favoring the intervention (81.4), asthma had the greatest proportion of surrogated outcomes (33.3), and asthma/allergic rhinitis laboratory outcomes (40). When divided by atopic disease, trials studying atopic dermatitis and urticaria had the same proportion of PIOs (64.7) as their secondary outcomes. Asthma had the highest (37.5) surrogate outcomes. Journals of general/internal medicine had a greater proportion of PIOs, and a post hoc analysis showed a significant difference in the proportion and secondary outcomes that favored the intervention between PIOs and laboratory outcomes. Conclusion: Approximately 7.5 out of 10 primary outcomes in RCTs published in general/internal medicine are PIOs compared to 5 out of 10 primary outcomes in atopic disease journals. Investigators should focus on selecting patient-important outcomes in their clinical trials to establish clinical guidelines with better-quality recommendations that impact patients' life and values. Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, NIHR) ID: CRD42021259256.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: While advances in asthma care have been made in Latin America, there is still a large unmet need in patients with uncontrolled asthma. This post hoc analysis of the QUEST study assessed safety and efficacy of dupilumab in the subgroup of patients enrolled in Latin American countries with a type 2 inflammatory asthma phenotype (blood eosinophils ≥ 150cells/µL or FeNO ≥25ppb). METHODS: LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST (NCT02414854) was a phase 3, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma. Eligible patients ≥ 12 years of age were randomized in a 2:2:1:1 ratio to receive 52 weeks of add-on subcutaneous dupilumab 200 or 300 mg every 2 weeks or matched-volume placebos. Pre-specified co-primary efficacy endpoints were the annualized rate of severe exacerbations during the treatment period and the change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 at treatment week 12. Asthma control, changes in asthma biomarker levels, and dupilumab safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: 530 (27.9% of the overall QUEST population; dupilumab: 353, placebo: 177) Latin-American patients were recruited; 420 (79.2%) had a type 2 inflammatory asthma phenotype. Dupilumab vs placebo reduced the annualized rate of severe exacerbations by 52.7% (P < 0.001) and increased pre-bronchodilator FEV1 at week 12 by 0.15 L (P < 0.001), in the type 2 population. Safety was consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the results in the overall population, dupilumab reduced the risk of severe asthma exacerbations and improved lung function in Latin American patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma and a type 2 phenotype.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Humanos , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , América Latina , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Método Doble Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Food allergy is very common throughout the world and has become a major public health problem, with 220 million people suffering from it. Food allergy has been disproportionately observed in people from industrialized or Western countries and was previously considered to predominate in the pediatric versus adult population. However, the current exponential growth of the adult population and older adults, especially in Western countries, and environmental and lifestyle changes, have profoundly changed the epidemiology of food allergy, with a growing increase even at advanced ages. The foods that represent the greatest severity and clinical impact are peanuts, walnuts, fish, shellfish, eggs, cow's milk protein, wheat, soy and seeds. Although some types of food allergies (cow's milk and egg) may disappear, peanut and tree nut allergies may persist into adulthood. The control or cure of cow's milk protein allergy is gradual throughout childhood and adolescence. Despite the predominance of allergy to fish, shellfish, peanuts, and tree nuts in most reactions in adults, the most common form of IgE-mediated food allergy is oral allergy syndrome or pollen allergy syndrome. food.
La alergia alimentaria es muy común en todo el mundo y se ha convertido en un importante problema de salud pública, pues 220 millones de personas la padecen. La alergia alimentaria se ha observado de manera desproporcionada en personas de países industrializados u occidentales, y se considera previamente con predominio en la población pediátrica versus adultos. Sin embargo, el crecimiento exponencial actual de la población adulta y adultos mayores, especialmente en los países occidentales, y los cambios ambientales y de estilo de vida, han cambiado profundamente la epidemiología de la alergia alimentaria, con un aumento creciente incluso en edades avanzadas. Los alimentos que representan mayor gravedad y repercusión clínica son: cacahuate, nuez, pescado, mariscos, huevo, proteína de leche de vaca, trigo, soya y semillas. Aunque algunos tipos de alergia alimentaria (leche de vaca y huevo) pueden desaparecer, la alergia al cacahuete y la nuez de árbol pueden persistir hasta la edad adulta. El control o curación de la alergia a la proteína de leche de vaca es gradual a lo largo de la niñez y la adolescencia. A pesar del predominio de la alergia al pescado, mariscos, cacahuates y nueces de árbol en la mayoría de las reacciones en adultos, la forma más común de alergia alimentaria mediada por IgE en es el síndrome de alergia oral o síndrome de alergia al polen-alimento.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche , Adolescente , Animales , Bovinos , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Anciano , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Alimentos , Estilo de VidaRESUMEN
Cold-induced urticaria is considered as a subtype of physical urticaria and also the second most common type of chronic inducible urticaria. Contact with cold surfaces or the environment may cause systemic reactions, especially during aquatic activities. A 22-year-old female patient with a history of sulfa drug allergy began her condition 2 years before the presence of generalized pruritic erythema with hives as well as 2 episodes that had been characterized by facial angioedema and syncope 3-5 minutes after being in contact with cold air or surfaces. On both events, she had just been outdoors on a cold, winter day. She was suspected to have cold-induced urticaria; thereby she had a positive reaction to the ice cube test. Due to the previous episodes of anaphylaxis, the patient was trained to administer intramuscular epinephrine. After 4 weeks of starting the treatment with antihistamines, no new events or injuries had occurred. Cold-induced urticaria may cause life-threatening reactions. The rate of anaphylaxis in these patients is low however, this case is presented to inform the importance of identifying this type of systemic reaction and preventing strategies.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Angioedema , Urticaria Crónica , Urticaria , Adulto , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etiología , Angioedema/diagnóstico , Angioedema/tratamiento farmacológico , Angioedema/etiología , Cara , Femenino , Humanos , Urticaria/diagnóstico , Urticaria/etiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: High-grade serous primary peritoneal cancer is highly sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy with response rates above 80%. Incidence of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to carboplatin is estimated to be between 15% and 20%, usually seen after a mean of 6-8 infusions, with patients developing moderate to severe reactions. CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old female patient with stage IIIC primary high-grade serous carcinoma of the peritoneum was diagnosed and chemotherapy with carboplatin and Paclitaxel was indicated by the oncology service and patient shows response. At 6 months the patient returns, a new PET/CT reports progression of the disease. Carboplatin/paclitaxel cycles are restarted and in the eight cycle of carboplatin within 40 min of administration, she presented severe anaphylaxis with skin, pulmonary, cardiac and atypical symptoms. Infusion is suspended and intramuscular epinephrine with hydrocortisone and chlorphenamine are administered resolving symptoms. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Intradermal skin test with carboplatin at the concentration of 10 mg / ml (dilution 1: 100) was positive. Due to the symptoms presented and to continue the safe reintroduction to carboplatin, a 4 bag 16-step drug desensitization protocol was carried out at a total dose of 620 mg with no hypersensitivity reactions. DISCUSSION: Prolonged carboplatin use is associated with an increased incidence of carboplatin-related hypersensitivity reactions. And in patients that present hypersensitivity reactions, a safe and effective carboplatin desensitization protocol can be carried out to reach the administration of a full dose. Desensitization protocol induces tolerance to a drug temporarily and is dependent on continuous exposure.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Neoplasias Ováricas , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/complicaciones , Paclitaxel , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de PositronesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD30 antigen. It is indicated for the treatment of CD30 + lymphomas and classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), including advanced (stage III-IV) untreated disease, relapsed/refractory disease, and consolidation after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In clinical trials the incidence of a hypersensitivity reaction is 1.2%. CASES REPORT: We present 3 cases of patients with refractory HL and anaphylaxis to the administration of BV ( Table 1). Symptoms are analyzed using a grading system described by Brown (2004) and a desensitization protocol was performed with a total dose of 100â mg of BV in 4 solution bags with an initial concentration of 1:1000 of total dose for cases of severe anaphylaxis, and desensitization of 3 solution bags with baseline concentration of 1: 100 for cases of moderate anaphylaxis. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: Intradermal skin tests were positive. Before desensitization, premedication with methylprednisolone and chlorphenamine was administered, as well as fluid therapy with 0.9% physiological solution at 100 cc/hour at induction stage, 250 cc/hour at maintenance stage, and increased to 500 cc/hour in case of hypersensitivity reaction. DISCUSSION: Drug desensitization in 12 or 16 steps allows tolerable administration of brentuximab vedotin after moderate to severe anaphylaxis. The favorable response to treatment of these patients may indicate that desensitization is a viable strategy for patients with relapsed or refractory HL.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Inmunoconjugados , Humanos , Brentuximab Vedotina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Anafilaxia/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Air pollution, climate change, and the decrease of biological diversity are major threats to human health. In the past decades, an increase in allergic diseases, including asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis, has been observed. Up to 40 % of the world population may have an allergic disease, which represents a significant impact on the quality of life of those who suffer from it, and environmental pollution is one of the causes of its presentation. Air pollution causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients with inflammatory airway diseases such as allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Oxidative stress in patients with respiratory diseases can induce eosinophilic inflammation in the airways, increase atopic allergic sensitization, and rise susceptibility to infections. Climate change has influenced exposure to extramural allergens and it is associated with exacerbations of respiratory diseases in the upper and lower airway. The interaction of indoor and outdoor environmental exposure and host factors can affect the development and progression of lifelong allergic diseases. The decrease of exposure to air pollutants has been associated with a favorable response in respiratory health, which is why it is necessary to implement measures that contribute to an improvement in air quality.
La contaminación del aire, el cambio climático y la reducción de la diversidad biológica son amenazas importantes para la salud humana. En las últimas décadas se ha observado un aumento en las enfermedades alérgicas, incluyendo asma y rinoconjuntivitis. Hasta 40 % de la población mundial puede presentar alguna enfermedad alérgica, lo que representa un impacto significativo en la calidad de vida de quienes la padecen, siendo la contaminación ambiental una de las causas de su presentación. La contaminación del aire causa morbilidad y mortalidad significativas en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias de las vías respiratorias, como rinitis alérgica, rinosinusitis crónica, asma y enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica. El estrés oxidativo en pacientes con enfermedades respiratorias puede inducir inflamación eosinofílica en las vías respiratorias, aumentar la sensibilización alérgica atópica y aumentar la susceptibilidad a infecciones. El cambio climático ha influido en la exposición a alérgenos extramuros y se asocia con exacerbaciones de enfermedades de la vía respiratoria superior e inferior. La interacción de las exposiciones ambientales en interiores y exteriores y los factores del huésped pueden afectar el desarrollo y la progresión de enfermedades alérgicas de por vida. La reducción de la exposición a los contaminantes del aire se ha asociado a una respuesta favorable en la salud respiratoria, por lo cual es necesario implementar medidas que contribuyan a la mejoría en la calidad del aire.
Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Contaminación del Aire , Asma , Rinitis Alérgica , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Alérgenos , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/etiología , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Rinitis Alérgica/epidemiología , Rinitis Alérgica/etiologíaRESUMEN
This allergy is a hypersensitivity reaction that is triggered by contact with latex. Symptoms vary depending on factors such as route, frequency, and exposure dose, as well as individual susceptibility. The clinical manifestations can be localized at the site of contact with latex or generalized. Exposure can occur directly as a result of contact with the skin and mucous membranes, that is by touching or being touched by objects with latex, or by inhaling (breathing) particles from objects with latex. Contact can also be indirect; for example, by ingesting food that has been handled by a worker wearing latex gloves or by having contact with a person who has been blowing up balloons. The diagnosis of latex allergy is made based on the patient's medical history and on what has been reported in the interrogation, and it is complemented with in vivo studies (such as skin tests and provocation tests) or in vitro studies (determination of specific IgE). The fundamental pillar in the treatment of latex allergy is the education of the patient to achieve the avoidance of products made with this material or the contact and intake of food that has had contact with latex. In view of the foregoing, latex allergy has a great medical and social relevance due to all the safety measures that the patient must take.
La alergia es una reacción de hipersensibilidad desencadenada tras el contacto con el látex. Los síntomas varían dependiendo de factores como la ruta, frecuencia y dosis de exposición, además de la susceptibilidad individual. Las manifestaciones clínicas pueden darse de forma localizada, en el sitio de contacto con el látex, o generalizadas. La exposición puede ocurrir de forma directa como resultado del contacto con la piel y mucosas, por tocar o ser tocado por objetos con látex, o al inhalar partículas provenientes de objetos con látex. El contacto también puede ser indirecto, al ingerir alimentos que fueron manipulados por un trabajador con guantes de látex, al tener contacto con una persona que ha estado inflando globos, por ejemplo. El diagnóstico de alergia al látex se realiza basado en la historia clínica del paciente, lo reportado en el interrogatorio y se complementa con estudios in vivo (como las pruebas cutáneas y las pruebas de provocación) o estudios in vitro (determinación de IgE específica). El pilar fundamental en el tratamiento de la alergia al látex es la educación del paciente para lograr la evitación de productos elaborados con este producto o el contacto e ingesta de alimentos que tuvieron contacto con el látex. Por lo anterior, la alergia al látex tiene una gran relevancia médica y social por todas las medidas de seguridad que debe llevar el paciente.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad al Látex , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/etiología , Pruebas CutáneasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Anaphylaxis is defined as a severe, life-threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction. Early diagnosis and treatment of a severe allergic reaction requires recognition of the signs and symptoms, as well as classification of severity. It is a clinical emergency, and healthcare providers should have the knowledge for recognition and management. The aim of the study is to evaluate the level of knowledge in the management of anaphylaxis in healthcare providers. METHODS: It is an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted among healthcare providers over 18 years old via a Google Forms link and shared through different social media platforms. A 12-item questionnaire was applied which included the evaluation of the management of anaphylaxis, from June 2020 to May 2021. RESULTS: A total of 1023 surveys were evaluated; 1013 met inclusion criteria and were included in the statistical analysis. A passing grade was considered with 8 or more correct answers out of 12; the overall approval percentage was 28.7%. The group with the highest percentage of approval in the questionnaire was health-care providers with more than 30 years of work experience. There was a significant difference between the proportions of approval between all specialty groups, and in a post-hoc analysis, allergy and immunology specialists showed greater proportions of approval compared to general medicine practitioners (62.9% vs 25%; p=<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: It is important that healthcare providers know how to recognize, diagnose, and treat anaphylaxis, and later refer them to specialists in Allergy and Clinical Immunology in order to make a personalized diagnosis and treatment.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe the most frequent dermatological conditions observed in COVID-19 patients and to determine whether their presence could be used to establish an early diagnosis or to predict the progression of the infection. METHODS: There was a review in PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE of all the articles that had been published between January 1st and November 1st, 2020, with the search terms focused on "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID-19" and "Skin diseases". RESULTS: Eighty three studies met the inclusion criteria. Skin lesions have been reported in 0.2 % of the patients. The most frequently reported dermatoses were: maculopapular/ morbilliform rashes, urticaria and angioedema, chilblain-like acral pattern, and vesicular lesions. Among researchers, there are differences of opinion about a possible diagnostic or prognostic value of the skin diseases that are associated to the infection. CONCLUSIONS: It is advisable to consider the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients who call the doctor for skin lesions, urticaria, or angioedema, with or without other symptoms of the infection, especially if there is a previous history of recent exposure to other infected subjects.
Objetivos: Describir las afecciones dermatológicas más frecuentes en los pacientes con la COVID-19 y precisar si su presencia puede ser utilizada para establecer un diagnóstico temprano o para predecir la evolución de la infección. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión en PubMed/MEDLINE y EMBASE de todos los artículos publicados entre enero 1 y noviembre 1 de 2020, con los términos de la búsqueda centrados en "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID-19" y "Enfermedades cutáneas". Resultados: Cumplieron los criterios de inclusión 83 estudios. Lesiones de la piel han sido reportadas en 0.2 % de los pacientes. Las erupciones maculopapulares/morbiliformes, la urticaria y el angioedema, el patrón acral parecido a sabañones y las lesiones vesiculares fueron las dermatosis más frecuentemente informadas. Existen diferencias de opinión entre los investigadores, acerca de un posible valor diagnóstico o pronóstico de las afecciones cutáneas asociadas con la infección. Conclusiones: Es recomendable considerar el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes que consultan por presentar lesiones cutáneas, urticaria o angioedema con o sin otros síntomas de la infección y en especial si existe algún antecedente de exposición reciente a otros sujetos infectados.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Angioedema/etiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Urticaria/diagnóstico , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Urticaria/etiologíaRESUMEN
Despite the efforts made to mitigate the consequences of this disease, natural rubber latex allergy (NRLA) continues to be a global health problem and is still considered one of the main worries in the working environment in many countries throughout the world. Due to thousands of products containing latex, it is not surprising that the current statistics suggest that prevalence remains high among healthcare workers and susceptible patients. In developed countries, reduction in the prevalence of IgE-mediated allergy to latex proteins from gloves may lead to lax attention by health care personnel. On the other hand, this situation is different in developing countries where there is a lack of epidemiological data associated with a deficit in education and awareness of this issue. The aim of this review is to provide an update of the current knowledge and practical recommendations regarding NRLA by allergologists from different parts of the world with experience in this field.
RESUMEN
This is Part 1 of an updated follow-up review of a World Allergy Organization (WAO) position paper published in 2012 on the diagnosis and treatment of urticaria and angioedema. Since 2012, there have been advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of chronic urticaria, and greater experience with the use of biologics, such as omalizumab, in patients with severe refractory disease. For these reasons, the WAO decided to initiate an update targeted to general practitioners around the world, incorporating the most recent information on epidemiology, immunopathogenesis, comorbidities, quality of life, clinical case presentations, and the management of chronic spontaneous and chronic inducible urticaria, including urticaria in special situations such as childhood and pregnancy. A special task force of WAO experts was invited to write the different sections of the manuscript, and the final document was approved by the WAO Board of Directors. This paper is not intended to be a substitute for current national and international guidelines on the management of urticaria and angioedema but to provide an updated, simplified guidance for physicians around the world who manage patients with this common ailment.
RESUMEN
Allergic diseases are one of the most frequent chronic diseases in the world. It has been established that there is a worldwide epidemic of allergic diseases; therefore, the treatment of allergies should be acknowledged as a worldwide priority and the specialty of allergy should be considered an important field in medicine. Due to the fact that allergic diseases involve many organs, and Allergy and Clinical Immunology is one of the specialties in which physicians may be trained to treat patients of all ages, the subject in medical schools is not always taught as an individual specialty but often as part of another subject such as internal medicine or pediatrics. Certified allergists are an important contribution to health systems, providing the necessary care for patients who have allergic diseases. Undergraduate programs in many universities do not include allergy as a subject, contributing to a lack of knowledge regarding the correct management of allergic diseases. World Health Organization (WHO) recommends 1 allergist per 50,000 people; however, there is an uneven distribution of allergy and clinical immunology specialists. Most practitioners are localized mainly in larger cities and state capitals, while in other regions, specialists are still greatly needed. Support and training systems are required for allergy and clinical immunology specialists to promote continuing education and keep their clinical competence up to date, which will lead to better care for their patients. Increased exposure to the concepts of allergy and clinical immunology diagnosis and treatment in undergraduate education may also potentially lead to an increase in interest in the field of allergy and clinical immunology among physicians in training. This review will approach allergy education in Mexico and other parts of Latin America.