RESUMEN
We describe the case of a 19-year-old girl with a left superior vena cava and a surgically corrected complete atrioventricular canal defect. After an inhospital sudden death an automatic defibrillator-cardioverter was implanted through her left superior vena cava. During the postoperative course, multiple inappropriate discharges caused by myopotential oversensing indicated the relocation of the electrode and, finally, insertion of two epicardial leads by a left submammarian thoracotomy approach, produced an optimal result.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores Implantables , Defectos del Tabique Interatrial/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Vena Cava Superior/anomalías , Adulto , Fibrilación Atrial/prevención & control , Electrodos Implantados , Femenino , Humanos , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
The amount of transplants has gone through a remarkable increase during the last years. As a result, congenital anomalies of little prevalence appear more and more often while performing the transplants. The persistence of upper cava vein is one of them and, if not linked to other anomalies, it usually remains unnoticed. This article presents a case of an orthotopic cardiac transplant in a patient with an upper cava vein duplication not diagnosed before undergoing surgery, and it compares the way it was handled to diverse techniques previously described.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Vena Cava Superior/anomalías , Adulto , Trasplante de Corazón/métodos , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Utilization of endocavitary defibrillation electrodes avoids thoracotomy used in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator procedures, reducing associated morbi-mortality. In our institution we have used this approach in 16 patients during a two years period (July 1990-July 1992). Fifteen were males, with a mean age of 56.9 +/- 10.6 (range 32-73). Nine patients suffered ischemic cardiomyopathy, 4 non ischemic cardiomyopathy and in three there was no structural heart disease. Mean ejection fraction was 44.3 +/- 18.3% (range 20-73%). Clinical arrhythmia was ventricular tachycardia in 8 cases, ventricular fibrillation in 6 cases and both types in 2. Endocavitary implantation procedure was not completed in 3 patients, thus an open trans-sternal approach was performed. In 13 patients it was completed successfully, using a total amount of 14 units (1 patient required two procedures due to sepsis in the generator pouch). Most important intraoperative incidences have been defibrillation thresholds between 20-24 J in 4 cases, displacement of defibrillation electrode from vena cava into coronary sinus in 4 cases, epicardial patch implantation via subcostal approach in 1 case and right ventricle perforation in 1 case. No operative mortality was registered. One patient suffered sudden death during follow-up. Surgical complications were few: 1 case of lead dislodgement and 1 infected wound in the generator's pouch. Non-surgical complications were also few: 1 case with superior vena cava syndrome and 1 patient with inadequate discharges. In conclusion, due to our early experience, we believe that endocavitary implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is the procedure of choice at the present time.