Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 33(10): 650-660, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33750600

RESUMEN

AIMS: Radiotherapy can provide quality of life and/or survival benefits to patients with metastatic cancer on diagnosis (MCOD). However, little is known about radiotherapy utilisation in this population. We compared the optimal radiotherapy rates with actual uptake for people who present with MCOD in the 45 and Up Study cohort, and examined factors associated with utilisation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 267 153 individuals aged ≥45 enrolled in the Sax Institute's 45 and Up Study completed a baseline questionnaire during 2006-2009, providing sociodemographic and health information and consent for linkage to administrative health databases. Participants diagnosed up to December 2013 with MCOD were identified in the New South Wales Cancer Registry. Radiotherapy receipt was determined from claims to the Medicare Benefits Schedule and/or records in the New South Wales Admitted Patient Data Collection (2006 to June 2016). The Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation optimal utilisation model was adapted for patients with MCOD to provide a benchmark. RESULTS: Of 17 687 participants diagnosed with cancer after completion of the baseline questionnaire, 2392 had MCOD. Of patients with MCOD, 25% had primary lung cancer, which was the most common site. The actual radiotherapy utilisation rate for all patients was 32.3%, lower than the optimal of 45.0%. From multivariable analysis, patients who were aged ≥80 years and/or needed help with daily tasks and/or had a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 were less likely to receive radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Actual uptake of radiotherapy was below optimal. Elderly patients and/or those with more comorbidities were less likely to receive radiotherapy. These results suggest a potential role for advocacy and education around radiotherapy for these patient groups.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Oncología por Radiación , Anciano , Humanos , Medicare , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Estados Unidos
2.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 32(5): 282-291, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32007353

RESUMEN

AIMS: Actual radiotherapy utilisation rates tend to be lower than the estimated optimal rates. Little is known about the factors contributing to this difference. Our aim was to identify factors associated with radiotherapy receipt for a cohort of cancer patients in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 267 153 participants in the NSW 45 and Up Study completed a questionnaire during 2006-2009 providing detailed health and socio-demographic information and consented to record linkage with administrative health datasets. Single primary cancers diagnosed after study enrolment were identified through linkage with the NSW Cancer Registry to December 2013. Radiotherapy receipt was determined from claims to the Medicare Benefits Schedule and/or records in the NSW Admitted Patient Data Collection (2006 to June 2016). Competing risks regression was used to examine associations between health and socio-demographic characteristics and radiotherapy treatment. RESULTS: Of 17 873 patients with an incident cancer, 5414 (30.3%) received radiotherapy during follow-up (median 5.3 years). Patients less likely to receive radiotherapy were aged <60 or 80+ years, female, had a Charlson co-morbidity index of 1+, needed help with daily tasks or lived ≥100 km from the nearest radiotherapy centre. CONCLUSION: Distinct subgroups of patients are less likely to receive radiotherapy. Advocacy and/or policy changes are needed to improve access.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/radioterapia , Radioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/patología , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Intern Med J ; 39(7): 453-8, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19220546

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patterns-of-care studies emphasize significant variation in the management of lung cancer. The aim of the study was to compare the patterns of care for patients diagnosed with lung cancer in 1996 and 2002 within three health areas in New South Wales. METHODS: Treatment data were collected from medical records and treating doctors for the calendar year 1996 and between 1 November 2001 and 31 December 2002. Patients were residents of either south-western Sydney, Hunter or Northern Sydney health areas at the time of diagnosis. chi(2)-tests were used to investigate changes in treatment patterns between the two time periods. An adjusted odds ratio for treatment in 2002 relative to 1996 was calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Data were available for 738 and 567 cases in 1996 and 2002, respectively. Cancer-specific therapy was given within 6 months of diagnosis to 62 and 64% of patients, respectively. Adjusting for health area, age, sex, pathology and performance status, the odds ratio (OR) of treatment in 2002 relative to 1996 was 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.35). When stage was included, the odds of treatment in 2002 relative to 1996 for non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 950) was 1.21 (95%CI 0.87-1.68). After adjustment for potential confounders, patients diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (n = 176) were substantially less likely to receive treatment in 2002 compared with patients diagnosed in 1996 (OR = 0.11; 95%CI 0.04-0.34). CONCLUSION: The odds of receiving treatment in 2002 and 1996 were similar. However, patients diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer in 2002 were significantly less likely to receive treatment. Overall, this study suggests there has been no change in lung cancer care in New South Wales. Further work is required to determine what proportion of persons with lung cancer should receive cancer-specific treatment so that clinical practices can be judged appropriately.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Atención al Paciente/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/epidemiología , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA