RESUMEN
Weather radiosondes play a crucial role in gathering atmospheric data for weather modeling and forecasting. However, their impact on marine wildlife, particularly seabirds, has raised concerns regarding the potential threats posed by these instruments. This study aims to assess the adverse effects of weather balloons on albatrosses, with a focus on the Southwest Atlantic region. The research reveals seven cases of entanglement of radiosonde equipment, leading to severe injuries and mortality along the Southern and Southeastern coasts of Brazil. Recommendations for mitigating the environmental impact of weather balloons include the adoption of biodegradable materials in their design and the implementation of improved retrieval protocols. Furthermore, the study stresses the importance of continued monitoring and research to address the interaction of weather radiosondes with marine animals. This approach is vital for ensuring the sustainable collection of scientific data while minimizing harm to marine life and ecosystems.
Asunto(s)
Aves , Ecosistema , Animales , Brasil , Tiempo (Meteorología) , Animales Salvajes , Monitoreo del AmbienteRESUMEN
The causes of the beaching and death of sea turtles have not been fully clarified and continue to be studied. Mild, moderate and severe lesions caused by spirorchiidiosis have been seen for decades in different organs and were recently defined as the cause of death of a loggerhead turtle. In the present study, eyes and optic nerves were analysed in green sea turtles with spirorchiidiosis and no other debilitating factors. Injuries to the optic nerve and choroid layer were described in 235 animals (90%) infected with spirorchiids. Turtles with ocular spirorchiidiosis are approximately three times more likely to be cachectic than turtles with spirorchiidiosis without ocular involvement.
Asunto(s)
Oftalmopatías/veterinaria , Ojo/parasitología , Infecciones por Trematodos/veterinaria , Tortugas/parasitología , Animales , Brasil , Oftalmopatías/parasitología , Femenino , Nervio Óptico/parasitología , Nervio Óptico/patología , Trematodos/patogenicidadRESUMEN
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death among liver transplant (LT) recipients. With a rising burden of posttransplantation metabolic disease, increases in cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality may reduce life expectancy after LT. It is unknown if the risk of long-term major cardiovascular events (MCEs) differs among LT recipients with varying diabetic states. We performed a retrospective cohort study of LT recipients from 2003 through 2013 to compare the incidence of MCEs among patients (1) without diabetes, (2) with pretransplantation diabetes, (3) with de novo transient posttransplantation diabetes, and (4) with de novo sustained posttransplantation diabetes. We analyzed 994 eligible patients (39% without diabetes, 24% with pretransplantation diabetes, 16% with transient posttransplantation diabetes, and 20% with sustained posttransplantation diabetes). Median follow-up was 54.7 months. Overall, 12% of patients experienced a MCE. After adjustment for demographic and clinical variables, sustained posttransplantation diabetes was the only state associated with a significantly increased risk of MCEs (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.20-3.18). Patients with sustained posttransplantation diabetes mellitus had a 13% and 27% cumulative incidence of MCEs at 5 and 10 years, respectively. While pretransplantation diabetes has traditionally been associated with cardiovascular disease, the long-term risk of MCEs is greatest in LT recipients with sustained posttransplantation diabetes mellitus.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Philadelphia/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
The shortage of deceased-donor organs is compounded by donation metrics that fail to account for the total pool of possible donors, leading to ambiguous donor statistics. We sought to assess potential metrics of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) utilizing data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2009-2012 and State Inpatient Databases (SIDs) from 2008-2014. A possible donor was defined as a ventilated inpatient death ≤75 years of age, without multi-organ system failure, sepsis, or cancer, whose cause of death was consistent with organ donation. These estimates were compared to patient-level data from chart review from two large OPOs. Among 2,907,658 inpatient deaths from 2009-2012, 96,028 (3.3%) were a "possible deceased-organ donor." The two proposed metrics of OPO performance were: (1) donation percentage (percentage of possible deceased-donors who become actual donors; range: 20.0-57.0%); and (2) organs transplanted per possible donor (range: 0.52-1.74). These metrics allow for comparisons of OPO performance and geographic-level donation rates, and identify areas in greatest need of interventions to improve donation rates. We demonstrate that administrative data can be used to identify possible deceased donors in the US and could be a data source for CMS to implement new OPO performance metrics in a standardized fashion.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Órganos , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/organización & administración , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Cadáver , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Outcomes of retransplantation after initial living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are poorly understood. The aim of this study is to better understand the indications, timing, and outcomes of retransplantation after initial LDLT when compared to after initial deceased donor transplantation (DDLT). From 2002 to 2013, 209 retransplant recipients after initial LDLT and 2893 after initial DDLT were identified in Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing. Multivariable logistic models evaluated the association between initial transplant type and 1-year mortality. The most frequent reason for early graft failure (≤14 days) in LDLT recipients was vascular thrombosis (63.6%) versus primary graft failure in initial DDLT recipients (59.1%). LDLT recipients were more often acutely and/or critically ill with a greater proportion of Status 1 (42.6% vs. 27.3%; p < 0.001) and intensive care unit (52.2% vs. 39.9%; p = 0.001) recipients at the time of retransplantation. There was no difference in adjusted 1-year mortality between retransplant recipients after initial LDLT versus DDLT (odds ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval 0.51-1.08). The proportion of recipients who ultimately required retransplantation for a third time was not different between the two groups (4.8%). Retransplantation outcomes after LDLT are not different from other retransplant procedures, despite recipients having greater acuity of illness and different indications.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Donadores Vivos , Reoperación/mortalidad , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Adulto , Aloinjertos , Cadáver , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Death rates from drug overdoses have nearly doubled since 2003, with over 47 000 deaths in 2014. This is largely attributable to the opioid epidemic. If the unfortunate deaths of otherwise healthy people have yielded an increase in organ donors, then this might serve as perhaps the only comforting factor among this tragic and unnecessary loss of life. In this viewpoint, we present data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) that show how the greatest relative increases in the mechanism of death among deceased donors from 2003 to 2014 were drug overdoses. Unfortunately, despite the absolute increase in the number of donors who died from a drug overdose, the mean organ yield was significantly lower than in other categories, in part due to concerns about disease transmission. In this paper, we present data on the changes in donation from donors with a drug overdose as a result of the opioid epidemic and discuss the need to educate transplant candidates and their physicians about the low risk of disease transmission compared to the greater risk of dying on a transplant waitlist.
Asunto(s)
Selección de Donante/normas , Epidemias , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/normas , Sobredosis de Droga , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
Liver allocation policies are evaluated by how they impact waitlisted patients, without considering broader outcomes for all patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) not on the waitlist. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using two nationally representative databases: HealthCore (2006-2014) and five-state Medicaid (California, Florida, New York, Ohio and Pennsylvania; 2002-2009). United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) linkages enabled ascertainment of waitlist- and transplant-related outcomes. We included patients aged 18-75 with ESLD (decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma) using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9)-based algorithms. Among 16 824 ESLD HealthCore patients, 3-year incidences of waitlisting and transplantation were 15.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] : 15.0-16.6%) and 8.1% (7.5-8.8%), respectively. Among 67 706 ESLD Medicaid patients, 3-year incidences of waitlisting and transplantation were 10.0% (9.7-10.4%) and 6.7% (6.5-7.0%), respectively. In HealthCore, the absolute ranges in states' waitlist mortality and transplant rates were larger than corresponding ranges among all ESLD patients (waitlist mortality: 13.6-38.5%, ESLD 3-year mortality: 48.9-62.0%; waitlist transplant rates: 36.3-72.7%, ESLD transplant rates: 4.8-13.4%). States' waitlist mortality and ESLD population mortality were not positively correlated: ρ = -0.06, p-value = 0.83 (HealthCore); ρ = -0.87, p-value = 0.05 (Medicaid). Waitlist and ESLD transplant rates were weakly positively correlated in Medicaid (ρ = 0.36, p-value = 0.55) but were positively correlated in HealthCore (ρ = 0.73, p-value = 0.001). Compared to population-based metrics, waitlist-based metrics overestimate geographic disparities in access to liver transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/cirugía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Hígado , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Listas de Espera , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Geografía , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
While recent policies have focused on allocating organs to patients most in need and lessening geographic disparities, the only mechanism to increase the actual number of transplants is to maximize the potential organ supply. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using OPTN data on all "eligible deaths" from 1/1/08 to 11/1/13 to evaluate variability in donor service area (DSA)-level donor authorization rates, and to quantify the potential gains associated with increasing authorization rates. Despite adjustments for donor demographics (age, race/ethnicity, cause of death) and geographic factors (rural/urban status of donor hospital, statewide participation in deceased-donor registries) among 52 571 eligible deaths, there was significant variability (p < 0.001) in donor authorization rates across the 58 DSAs. Overall DSA-level adjusted authorization rates ranged from 63.5% to 89.5% (median: 72.7%). An additional 773-1623 eligible deaths could have been authorized, yielding 2679-5710 total organs, if the DSAs with authorization rates below the median and 75th percentile, respectively, implemented interventions to perform at the level of the corresponding reference DSA. Opportunities exist within the current organ acquisition framework to markedly improve DSA-level donor authorization rates. Such initiatives would mitigate waitlist mortality while increasing the number of transplants.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Donantes de Tejidos , HumanosRESUMEN
Since initiation of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)-based allocation for liver transplantation, the risk of posttransplant end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has increased. Recent US data have demonstrated comparable, if not superior survival, among recipients of living donor liver transplants (LDLT) when compared to deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients. However, little is known about the incidence of ESRD post-LDLT. We analyzed linked Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and US Renal Data System (USRDS) data of first-time liver-alone transplant recipients from February 27, 2002 to March 1, 2011, and restricted the cohort to recipients with a laboratory MELD score ≤25 not on dialysis prior to transplantation, in order to evaluate the incidence of ESRD post-LDLT, and to compare the incidence among LDLT versus DDLT recipients. There were 28 707 DDLT and 1917 LDLT recipients included in the analyses. The 1-, 3- and 5-year unadjusted risk of ESRD was 1.7%, 2.9% and 3.4% in LDLT recipients, compared with 1.5%, 3.0% and 4.8% in DDLT recipients (p > 0.05), respectively. In multivariable competing risk Cox regression models, there was no association between receiving an LDLT and risk of ESRD (sub-hazard ratio: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.77-1.26, p = 0.92). In conclusion, the incidence of ESRD post-LDLT in the United States is low, and there are no significant differences among LDLT and DDLT recipients with MELD scores ≤25 at transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/cirugía , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Trasplante de Hígado , Donadores Vivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Organ transplantation is an acceptable option for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with end-stage kidney or liver disease. With worse outcomes on the waitlist, HIV-infected patients may actually be disproportionately affected by the organ shortage in the United States. One potential solution is the use of HIV-infected deceased donors (HIVDD), recently legalized by the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act. This is the first analysis of patient-specific data from potential HIVDD, retrospectively examining charts of HIV-infected patients dying in care at six HIV clinics in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2014. Our data suggest that there are four to five potential HIVDD dying in Philadelphia annually who might yield two to three kidneys and three to five livers for transplant. Extrapolated nationally, this would approximate 356 potential HIVDD yielding 192 kidneys and 247 livers annually. However, several donor risk indices raise concerns about the quality of kidneys that could be recovered from HIVDD as a result of older donor age and comorbidities. On the other hand, livers from these potential HIVDD are of similar quality to HIV-negative donors dying locally, although there is a high prevalence of positive hepatitis C antibody.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/mortalidad , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Población Urbana , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Since 2006, waitlist candidates with portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) have been eligible for standardized Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception points. However, there are no data evaluating the current POPH exception policy and its implementation. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data to compare outcomes of patients with approved POPH MELD exceptions from 2006 to 2012 to all nonexception waitlist candidates during this period. Since 2006, 155 waitlist candidates had approved POPH MELD exceptions, with only 73 (47.1%) meeting the formal OPTN exception criteria. Furthermore, over one-third of those with approved POPH exceptions either did not fulfill hemodynamic criteria consistent with POPH or had missing data, with 80% of such patients receiving a transplant based on receiving exception points. In multivariable multistate survival models, waitlist candidates with POPH MELD exceptions had an increased risk of death compared to nonexception waitlist candidates, regardless of whether they did (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.73-3.52; n = 100) or did not (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.04-2.47; n = 55) have hemodynamic criteria consistent with POPH. These data highlight the need for OPTN/UNOS to reconsider not only the policy for POPH MELD exceptions, but also the process by which such points are awarded.
Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Hipertensión Pulmonar/complicaciones , Trasplante de Hígado , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation have been well described. It has been surmised that longer time on the waitlist may select for tumors with a lower-risk of recurrence posttransplant, as patients with unfavorable tumor characteristics would be delisted due to tumor progression. Utilizing national explant pathology records from transplant recipients waitlisted with T2 HCC exception points, this study explored the correlation between waiting time and the development of pathologic HCC features associated with increased risk of tumor recurrence. Of 1976 explant pathology reports submitted nationally between April 8, 2012 and June 30, 2013, 1453 (73.5%) were from recipients with automatic T2 HCC exception points. There was no association between pretransplant waiting time and the proportion of HCC explants with either: (i) a poorly differentiated tumor; (ii) macrovascular invasion; (iii) HCC beyond Milan or University of California San Francisco criteria; (iv) HCC beyond the "up-to-seven" criteria; or (v) extra-hepatic or lymph node involvement. Though there was a statistically significant increase in microvascular invasion in recipients with pretransplant waiting 6-12 months, this association was not seen when adjusted for United Network for Organ Sharing region. These findings suggest that waiting time alone may not select for tumors with more favorable characteristics.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Selección de Paciente , Receptores de Trasplantes , Listas de Espera , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Pronóstico , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
In the United States, liver transplantation using donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) donors is challenged by persistently inferior graft survival compared with donation after neurological death (DND), along with declining rates of liver transplantation relative to the total number of DCDD donors. Advances in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation graft survival temporally related to the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study consortium suggest that a similarly focused collaborative effort may serve to stimulate evolution within DCDD liver transplantation. Without a multi-center consortium to support innovative trials, the current state of DCDD liver transplantation is unlikely to progress.
Asunto(s)
Muerte , Selección de Donante/métodos , Supervivencia de Injerto/fisiología , Trasplante de Hígado , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , HumanosRESUMEN
Due to the risk of waitlist dropout from tumor progression, liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria (MC) receive standardized exception points. An expansion of this process to candidates with HCC beyond MC has been proposed, though it remains controversial. This study sought to better define the utilization of exception points in candidates with HCC beyond MC and the associated outcomes. We reviewed all nonstandardized HCC applications that underwent formal regional review board evaluation between January 1, 2005 and March 2, 2011; 2184 initial HCC exception point applications were submitted. Of these, 41.9% fulfilled MC, 26.6% fulfilled University of California-San Francisco (UCSF) criteria and 17.6% exceeded UCSF criteria. The majority of applications were accepted: 89.8% within UCSF and 71.2% beyond UCSF. There was a significantly (p < 0.001) higher risk of death on the waitlist or within 90 days of waitlist removal for candidates within UCSF (12.4%) or beyond UCSF (13.0%) criteria, compared to candidates with HCC within MC (6.0%). However, posttransplant outcomes were similar. While these results suggest increasing access to candidates with HCC beyond MC, comprehensive documentation of tumor characteristics and of successful downstaging is needed to ensure priority is restricted to those with the highest likelihood of favorable posttransplant outcome.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado , Selección de Paciente , Listas de Espera , Adulto , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Listas de Espera/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Observed co-morbidity among the mood and anxiety disorders has led to the development of increasingly sophisticated dimensional models to represent the common and unique features of these disorders. Patients often present to primary care settings with a complex mixture of anxiety, depression and somatic symptoms. However, relatively little is known about how somatic symptoms fit into existing dimensional models. METHOD: We examined the structure of 91 anxiety, depression and somatic symptoms in a sample of 5433 primary care patients drawn from 14 countries. One-, two- and three-factor lower-order models were considered; higher-order and hierarchical variants were studied for the best-fitting lower-order model. RESULTS: A hierarchical, bifactor model with all symptoms loading simultaneously on a general factor, along with one of three specific anxiety, depression and somatic factors, was the best-fitting model. The general factor accounted for the bulk of symptom variance and was associated with psychosocial dysfunction. Specific depression and somatic symptom factors accounted for meaningful incremental variance in diagnosis and dysfunction, whereas anxiety variance was associated primarily with the general factor. CONCLUSIONS: The results (a) are consistent with previous studies showing the presence and importance of a broad internalizing or distress factor linking diverse emotional disorders, and (b) extend the bounds of internalizing to include somatic complaints with non-physical etiologies.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Somatomorfos/epidemiología , Afecto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/clasificación , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/clasificación , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Análisis Factorial , Asia Oriental/epidemiología , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Control Interno-Externo , Entrevista Psicológica , Modelos Teóricos , Análisis de Regresión , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos Somatomorfos/clasificación , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , América del Sur/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Presentamos nuestra estadística de pacientes portadores de heridas de armas de fuego en la cabeza antendidos en nuestro centro en los 8 años trasncurridos entre julio 1992 y julio 2000. Con oportunos y optimos tratamientos neuroquirúrgicos y de cuidados intensivos, observamos una significativa disminución de la morbimortalidad (GOS 1-2). (AU)