RESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether uncontrolled asthma was associated with healthcare outcomes among Latin American patients with asthma. We used data from 2168 patients with asthma who participated in the 2011 Latin America Asthma Insights and Management (AIM) survey. Using Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, patients were categorized as having asthma that was well-controlled, partly controlled, or uncontrolled. Overall, 7% of the patients surveyed had asthma that was classified as well-controlled. Patients whose asthma was not well-controlled were significantly more likely to report use of asthma medications (ORs ranging from 1.6-41) and to have had emergency healthcare visits or hospitalizations for their asthma in the previous year (ORs ranging from 2.1 to 5.9). They also reported decreases in their productivity compared to patients with well-controlled asthma. These associations suggest that emphasis on improving asthma control could have substantial effects on patient productivity and utilization of healthcare resources.
Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Argentina/epidemiología , Argentina/etnología , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/etnología , Brasil/epidemiología , Brasil/etnología , Niño , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/etnología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiología , México/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Puerto Rico/etnología , Venezuela/epidemiología , Venezuela/etnología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Scarce data exist about multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence in South America. The objective of the study is to determine the prevalence of MS in a high populated area from Argentina (Greater Buenos Aires Metropolitan area) using the capture-recapture methodology. METHODS: Greater Buenos Aires is the generic denomination that refers to the megalopolis comprised by the autonomous city of Buenos Aires and the surrounding conurbation of the province of Buenos Aires. The study was carried out taking July 1996 as the prevalence month. We used capture-recapture method to estimate the prevalence of MS cross matching registries from four MS Centers. RESULTS: A total of 803 registries were obtained from the four lists. Log-linear model for capture-recapture method was used to analyze the data. The population of the area based on the 1990 census was 12,594,974; the number of MS cases estimated amongst sources interactions were between 1833 and 2359; the prevalence estimated ranged from 14 to 19.8 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to provide epidemiological data on the prevalence of MS in a large population in Argentina (Greater Buenos Aires Metropolitan area). Further epidemiological studies will clarify the true prevalence of MS in South America.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Argentina/epidemiología , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos , Prevalencia , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
There are few studies reporting multiple sclerosis prevalence rates in the Buenos Aires region, Argentina (latitude 34 degrees S) (between 12-18.5/100 000 inhabitants), and no studies have been performed in the larger region between parallels 36 degrees and 55 degrees S. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence rates and clinical features of multiple sclerosis in residents of the Argentine Patagonia. Four cities from the region were selected for this study, giving a sample population of 417 666 inhabitants (approximately 24% of the total Patagonia population). 1(st) March 2002 was determined as prevalence day. Patients were ascertained using multiple case-finding methods. The point prevalence rate was 17.2/100 000 (17.2 age-adjusted to the world population). Prevalence rates were higher for women than for men, 22.1 versus 12.2/100 000 inhabitants (21.4 versus 12.7 sex-adjusted to the world population). The study population was mainly of European descent and mestizoes. Clinical features were similar to those reported in other countries. This study shows that Argentine Patagonia is a medium-risk area with no south-north gradient between parallels 55 degrees and 36 degrees S. The Patagonia population shows recent internal migration that makes it difficult to determine whether the exposure to potential risk factors has been long enough to modify the disease incidence.